forked from OSchip/llvm-project
![]() initializers. This has some interesting interactions with our existing extensions to support C99 designated initializers as an extension in C++. Those are resolved as follows: * We continue to permit the full breadth of C99 designated initializers in C++, with the exception that we disallow a partial overwrite of an initializer with a non-trivially-destructible type. (Full overwrite is OK, because we won't run the first initializer at all.) * The C99 extensions are disallowed in SFINAE contexts and during overload resolution, where they could change the meaning of valid programs. * C++20 disallows reordering of initializers. We only check for that for the simple cases that the C++20 rules permit (designators of the form '.field_name =' and continue to allow reordering in other cases). It would be nice to improve this behavior in future. * All C99 designated initializer extensions produce a warning by default in C++20 mode. People are going to learn the C++ rules based on what Clang diagnoses, so it's important we diagnose these properly by default. * In C++ <= 17, we apply the C++20 rules rather than the C99 rules, and so still diagnose C99 extensions as described above. We continue to accept designated C++20-compatible initializers in C++ <= 17 silently by default (but naturally still reject under -pedantic-errors). This is not a complete implementation of P0329R4. In particular, that paper introduces new non-C99-compatible syntax { .field { init } }, and we do not support that yet. This is based on a previous patch by Don Hinton, though I've made substantial changes when addressing the above interactions. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59754 llvm-svn: 370544 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
basic | ||
class | ||
class.access | ||
class.derived | ||
concepts-ts | ||
conv | ||
cpp | ||
dcl.dcl | ||
dcl.decl | ||
drs | ||
except | ||
expr | ||
lex | ||
module | ||
modules-ts | ||
over | ||
special | ||
stmt.stmt | ||
temp |