David Majnemer c0a313b57c SROA: The alloca type isn't a candidate promotion type for vectors ... The alloca's type is irrelevant, only those types which are used in a load or store of the exact size of the slice should be considered. This manifested as an assertion failure when we compared the various types: we had a size mismatch. This fixes PR21480. llvm-svn: 222499		2014-11-21 02:34:55 +00:00
..
address-spaces.ll	[SROA] Teach SROA how to handle pointers from address spaces other than	2014-02-26 08:25:02 +00:00
alignment.ll	Update Transforms tests to use CHECK-LABEL for easier debugging. No functionality change.	2013-07-14 01:42:54 +00:00
basictest.ll	[SROA] Use the correct index integer size in GEPs through non-default	2014-02-26 10:08:16 +00:00
big-endian.ll	Update Transforms tests to use CHECK-LABEL for easier debugging. No functionality change.	2013-07-14 01:42:54 +00:00
fca.ll	Update Transforms tests to use CHECK-LABEL for easier debugging. No functionality change.	2013-07-14 01:42:54 +00:00
phi-and-select.ll	SROA: Don't insert instructions before a PHI	2014-09-01 21:20:14 +00:00
slice-order-independence.ll	SROA: Only split loads on byte boundaries	2014-06-17 00:19:35 +00:00
slice-width.ll	Add a test case for SROA where the store size is bigger than slice size. The	2014-08-22 23:27:04 +00:00
vector-conversion.ll	SROA: Handle casts involving vectors of pointers and integer scalars.	2013-09-21 20:36:04 +00:00
vector-lifetime-intrinsic.ll	Fix a case in SROA where lifetime intrinsics could inhibit alloca promotion. In	2014-08-07 21:07:35 +00:00
vector-promotion.ll	SROA: The alloca type isn't a candidate promotion type for vectors	2014-11-21 02:34:55 +00:00
vectors-of-pointers.ll	…