Richard Smith 034185c2f9 The 'constexpr implies const' rule for non-static member functions is gone in ... C++1y, so stop adding the 'const' there. Provide a compatibility warning for code relying on this in C++11, with a fix-it hint. Update our lazily-written tests to add the const, except for those ones which were testing our implementation of this rule. llvm-svn: 179969		2013-04-21 01:08:50 +00:00
..
p2-0x.cpp	The 'constexpr implies const' rule for non-static member functions is gone in	2013-04-21 01:08:50 +00:00
p3-0x-nowarn.cpp	Prior to adding the new "expected-no-diagnostics" directive to VerifyDiagnosticConsumer, make the necessary adjustment to 580 test-cases which will henceforth require this new directive.	2012-10-19 12:44:48 +00:00
p3-0x.cpp	The 'constexpr implies const' rule for non-static member functions is gone in	2013-04-21 01:08:50 +00:00
p5-0x.cpp	The 'constexpr implies const' rule for non-static member functions is gone in	2013-04-21 01:08:50 +00:00