forked from OSchip/llvm-project
![]() Summary: There should be no intesection between SDWA operands and potential MIs. E.g.: ``` v_and_b32 v0, 0xff, v1 -> src:v1 sel:BYTE_0 v_and_b32 v2, 0xff, v0 -> src:v0 sel:BYTE_0 v_add_u32 v3, v4, v2 ``` In that example it is possible that we would fold 2nd instruction into 3rd (v_add_u32_sdwa) and then try to fold 1st instruction into 2nd (that was already destroyed). So if SDWAOperand is also a potential MI then do not apply it. Reviewers: vpykhtin, arsenm Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32804 llvm-svn: 303347 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
AArch64 | ||
AMDGPU | ||
ARM | ||
AVR | ||
BPF | ||
Generic | ||
Hexagon | ||
Inputs | ||
Lanai | ||
MIR | ||
MSP430 | ||
Mips | ||
NVPTX | ||
PowerPC | ||
SPARC | ||
SystemZ | ||
Thumb | ||
Thumb2 | ||
WebAssembly | ||
WinEH | ||
X86 | ||
XCore |