llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/copy-initialization.cpp

83 lines
1.9 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++98 %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
class X {
public:
explicit X(const X&); // expected-note {{candidate constructor}}
X(int*); // expected-note 3{{candidate constructor}}
explicit X(float*); // expected-note {{candidate constructor}}
};
class Y : public X { };
void f(Y y, int *ip, float *fp) {
X x1 = y; // expected-error{{no matching constructor for initialization of 'X'}}
X x2 = 0;
X x3 = ip;
X x4 = fp; // expected-error{{no viable conversion}}
X x2a(0); // expected-error{{call to constructor of 'X' is ambiguous}}
X x3a(ip);
X x4a(fp);
}
struct foo {
void bar(); // expected-note{{declared here}}
};
// PR3600
void test(const foo *P) { P->bar(); } // expected-error{{'this' argument to member function 'bar' has type 'const foo', but function is not marked const}}
namespace PR6757 {
struct Foo {
Foo(); // expected-note{{not viable}}
Foo(Foo&); // expected-note{{candidate constructor not viable}}
};
struct Bar {
operator const Foo&() const;
};
void f(Foo);
void g(Foo foo) {
f(Bar()); // expected-error{{no viable constructor copying parameter of type 'const PR6757::Foo'}}
f(foo);
}
}
namespace DR5 {
// Core issue 5: if a temporary is created in copy-initialization, it is of
// the cv-unqualified version of the destination type.
namespace Ex1 {
struct C { };
C c;
struct A {
A(const A&);
A(const C&);
};
const volatile A a = c; // ok
}
namespace Ex2 {
struct S {
S(S&&);
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L // C++03 or earlier modes
// expected-warning@-2 {{rvalue references are a C++11 extension}}
#endif
S(int);
};
const S a(0);
const S b = 0;
}
}
struct A {};
struct B : A {
B();
B(B&);
B(A);
B(int);
};
B b = 0; // ok, calls B(int) then A(const A&) then B(A).