forked from OSchip/llvm-project
19172c4f70
a function pointer is neither better nor worse than binding a function lvalue to a function rvalue reference. Don't get confused and think that both bindings are binding to a function lvalue (which would make the lvalue form win); the const reference is binding to an rvalue. The "real" bug in PR20218 is still present: we're getting the wrong answer from template argument deduction, and that's what leads us to this weird overload set. llvm-svn: 212916 |
||
|---|---|---|
| clang | ||
| clang-tools-extra | ||
| compiler-rt | ||
| debuginfo-tests | ||
| libclc | ||
| libcxx | ||
| libcxxabi | ||
| lld | ||
| lldb | ||
| llvm | ||
| openmp | ||
| polly | ||