maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/libc/utils/UnitTest
History
Michael Jones c73c23f2a9 [libc][NFC] Add a death test API adaptation macro 
Fuchsia's zxtest has a slightly different death test definition, and
this macro makes our death test API work on Fuchsia.

Reviewed By: sivachandra

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95648
 		2021-02-01 19:19:04 +00:00
..
CMakeLists.txt [libc][NFC] add macro for fuchsia to switch test backend to zxtest 2021-01-13 21:28:02 +00:00
FuchsiaTest.h [libc][NFC] Add a death test API adaptation macro 2021-02-01 19:19:04 +00:00
LibcTest.cpp [libc][NFC] add macro for fuchsia to switch test backend to zxtest 2021-01-13 21:28:02 +00:00
LibcTest.h [libc][NFC] Add a death test API adaptation macro 2021-02-01 19:19:04 +00:00
README.md [libc] NFC: Fix trivial typo in comments, documents, and messages 2020-04-06 16:19:34 +09:00
Test.h [libc][NFC] add macro for fuchsia to switch test backend to zxtest 2021-01-13 21:28:02 +00:00

README.md

The LLVM libc unit test framework

This directory contains a lightweight implementation of a gtest like unit test framework for LLVM libc.

Why not gtest?

While gtest is great, featureful and time tested, it uses the C and C++ standard libraries. Hence, using it to test LLVM libc (which is also an implementation of the C standard libraries) causes various kinds of mixup/conflict problems.

How is it different from gtest?

LLVM libc's unit test framework is much less featureful as compared to gtest. But, what is available strives to be exactly like gtest.

Will it be made as featureful as gtest in future?

It is not clear if LLVM libc needs/will need every feature of gtest. We only intend to extend it on an as needed basis. Hence, it might never be as featureful as gtest.