llvm-project/libc/utils/UnitTest
Michael Jones e0e7fa36d3 [libc] enable s(n)printf without fullbuild
To use the FILE data structure, LLVM-libc must be in fullbuild mode
since it expects its own implementation. This means that (f)printf can't
be used without fullbuild, but s(n)printf only uses strings. This patch
adjusts the CMake to allow for this.

Reviewed By: sivachandra, lntue

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131913
2022-08-15 13:45:34 -07:00
..
CMakeLists.txt [libc] enable s(n)printf without fullbuild 2022-08-15 13:45:34 -07:00
FPExceptMatcher.cpp [libc][NFC] Move test related pieces from FPUtil to util/UnitTest. 2021-10-29 15:37:30 +00:00
FPExceptMatcher.h [libc][NFC] Move test related pieces from FPUtil to util/UnitTest. 2021-10-29 15:37:30 +00:00
FPMatcher.cpp [libc][NFC] Use STL case for type_traits 2022-07-29 09:57:03 +00:00
FPMatcher.h [libc][NFC] Use STL case for type_traits 2022-07-29 09:57:03 +00:00
FuchsiaTest.h [libc] Add Fuchsia implementation of ::testing::Test 2022-06-13 21:03:51 +00:00
LibcTest.cpp [libc] Support StringView equality tests 2022-08-10 11:23:53 -07:00
LibcTest.h [libc] Support StringView equality tests 2022-08-10 11:23:53 -07:00
LibcTestMain.cpp [libc] Add option to run specific tests 2021-07-23 16:08:13 +00:00
MemoryMatcher.cpp [libc] Optimized version of memmove 2022-02-08 11:55:09 +00:00
MemoryMatcher.h [libc] Optimized version of memmove 2022-02-08 11:55:09 +00:00
PlatformDefs.h [libc] Clean up Windows macros 2021-07-23 21:12:36 +00:00
PrintfMatcher.cpp [libc] Add Uint128 type as a fallback when __uint128_t is not available. 2022-06-24 16:03:35 +00:00
PrintfMatcher.h [libc] Add Printf FormatSection Matcher 2022-04-22 14:21:39 -07:00
README.md
StringUtils.h [libc][NFC] Use STL case for type_traits 2022-07-29 09:57:03 +00:00
Test.h [libc][NFC] add macro for fuchsia to switch test backend to zxtest 2021-01-13 21:28:02 +00:00

README.md

The LLVM libc unit test framework

This directory contains a lightweight implementation of a gtest like unit test framework for LLVM libc.

Why not gtest?

While gtest is great, featureful and time tested, it uses the C and C++ standard libraries. Hence, using it to test LLVM libc (which is also an implementation of the C standard libraries) causes various kinds of mixup/conflict problems.

How is it different from gtest?

LLVM libc's unit test framework is much less featureful as compared to gtest. But, what is available strives to be exactly like gtest.

Will it be made as featureful as gtest in future?

It is not clear if LLVM libc needs/will need every feature of gtest. We only intend to extend it on an as needed basis. Hence, it might never be as featureful as gtest.