forked from OSchip/llvm-project
![]() 1. In the top level of ParseStatementOrDeclaration, don't eat a } if we just parsed a statement if it list there. Also, don't even bother emitting an error about a missing semicolon if the statement had a bug (an rbrace is fine). 2. In do/while parsing, don't require a 'while' to be present if the do body didn't parse. This allows us to generate a clean diagnostic for this code: t.c:1:22: error: expected expression void foo (void) { do . while (0); } ^ Thanks to Neil for pointing this out. llvm-svn: 59256 |
||
---|---|---|
clang | ||
llvm |