Combined with 'da98651 - Revert "DR2064:
decltype(E) is only a dependent', this change (5a391d3) caused verifier
errors when building Chromium. See https://crbug.com/1168494#c1 for a
reproducer.
Additionally it reverts changes that were dependent on this one, see
below.
> Following up on PR48517, fix handling of template arguments that refer
> to dependent declarations.
>
> Treat an id-expression that names a local variable in a templated
> function as being instantiation-dependent.
>
> This addresses a language defect whereby a reference to a dependent
> declaration can be formed without any construct being value-dependent.
> Fixing that through value-dependence turns out to be problematic, so
> instead this patch takes the approach (proposed on the core reflector)
> of allowing the use of pointers or references to (but not values of)
> dependent declarations inside value-dependent expressions, and instead
> treating template arguments as dependent if they evaluate to a constant
> involving such dependent declarations.
>
> This ends up affecting a bunch of OpenMP tests, due to OpenMP
> imprecisely handling instantiation-dependent constructs, bailing out
> early instead of processing dependent constructs to the extent possible
> when handling the template.
>
> Previously committed as 8c1f2d15b8, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted.
This reverts commit 5a391d38ac.
It also restores clang/test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp to its state before
da986511fb.
Revert "[c++20] P1907R1: Support for generalized non-type template arguments of scalar type."
> Previously committed as 9e08e51a20, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
> following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
>
> 7e84aa1b81 by Simon Pilgrim
> ed13d8c667 by me
> 95c7b6cadb by Sam McCall
> 430d5d8429 by Dave Zarzycki
This reverts commit 4b574008ae.
Revert "[msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay"
> [msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay
> applied to an array the same as the array itself.
>
> This follows MS ABI, and corrects a regression from the implementation
> of generalized non-type template parameters, where we "forgot" how to
> mangle this case.
This reverts commit 18e093faf7.
Previously committed as 9e08e51a20, and
reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
7e84aa1b81 by Simon Pilgrim
ed13d8c667 by me
95c7b6cadb by Sam McCall
430d5d8429 by Dave Zarzycki
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain GenericSelectionExpr
nodes (this is _Generic from C11). This is needed, for example, for
CTU analysis of C code that makes use of _Generic, like the Linux
kernel.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter. Additionally, this change adds support for structural
equivalence of _Generic in the AST.
Reviewed By: martong, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92600
There are several `::IsStructurallyEquivalent` overloads for Decl subclasses
that are used for comparing declarations. There is also one overload that takes
just two Decl pointers which ends up queuing the passed Decls to be later
compared in `CheckKindSpecificEquivalence`.
`CheckKindSpecificEquivalence` implements the dispatch logic for the different
Decl subclasses. It is supposed to hand over the queued Decls to the
subclass-specific `::IsStructurallyEquivalent` overload that will actually
compare the Decl instance. It also seems to implement a few pieces of actual
node comparison logic inbetween the dispatch code.
This implementation causes that the different overloads of
`::IsStructurallyEquivalent` do different (and sometimes no) comparisons
depending on which overload of `::IsStructurallyEquivalent` ends up being
called.
For example, if I want to compare two FieldDecl instances, then I could either
call the `::IsStructurallyEquivalent` with `Decl *` or with `FieldDecl *`
parameters. The overload that takes FieldDecls is doing a correct comparison.
However, the `Decl *` overload just queues the Decl pair.
`CheckKindSpecificEquivalence` has no dispatch logic for `FieldDecl`, so it
always returns true and never does any actual comparison.
On the other hand, if I try to compare two FunctionDecl instances the two
possible overloads of `::IsStructurallyEquivalent` have the opposite behaviour:
The overload that takes `FunctionDecl` pointers isn't comparing the names of the
FunctionDecls while the overload taking a plain `Decl` ends up comparing the
function names (as the comparison logic for that is implemented in
`CheckKindSpecificEquivalence`).
This patch tries to make this set of functions more consistent by making
`CheckKindSpecificEquivalence` a pure dispatch function without any
subclass-specific comparison logic. Also the dispatch logic is now autogenerated
so it can no longer miss certain subclasses.
The comparison code from `CheckKindSpecificEquivalence` is moved to the
respective `::IsStructurallyEquivalent` overload so that the comparison result
no longer depends if one calls the `Decl *` overload or the overload for the
specific subclass. The only difference is now that the `Decl *` overload is
queuing the parameter while the subclass-specific overload is directly doing the
comparison.
`::IsStructurallyEquivalent` is an implementation detail and I don't think the
behaviour causes any bugs in the current implementation (as carefully calling
the right overload for the different classes works around the issue), so the
test for this change is that I added some new code for comparing `MemberExpr`.
The new comparison code always calls the dispatching overload and it previously
failed as the dispatch didn't support FieldDecls.
Reviewed By: martong, a_sidorin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87619
Right now the ASTImporter assumes for most Expr nodes that they are always equal
which leads to non-compatible declarations ending up being merged. This patch
adds the basic framework for comparing Stmts (and with that also Exprs) and
implements the custom checks for a few Stmt subclasses. I'll implement the
remaining subclasses in follow up patches (mostly because there are a lot of
subclasses and some of them require further changes like having GNU language in
the testing framework)
The motivation for this is that in LLDB we try to import libc++ source code and
some of the types we are importing there contain expressions (e.g. because they
use `enable_if<expr>`), so those declarations are currently merged even if they
are completely different (e.g. `enable_if<value> ...` and `enable_if<!value>
...` are currently considered equal which is clearly not true).
Reviewed By: martong, balazske
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87444
This patch adds a matrix type to Clang as described in the draft
specification in clang/docs/MatrixSupport.rst. It introduces a new option
-fenable-matrix, which can be used to enable the matrix support.
The patch adds new MatrixType and DependentSizedMatrixType types along
with the plumbing required. Loads of and stores to pointers to matrix
values are lowered to memory operations on 1-D IR arrays. After loading,
the loaded values are cast to a vector. This ensures matrix values use
the alignment of the element type, instead of LLVM's large vector
alignment.
The operators and builtins described in the draft spec will will be added in
follow-up patches.
Reviewers: martong, rsmith, Bigcheese, anemet, dexonsmith, rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72281
This reverts commit 61ba1481e2.
I'm reverting this because it breaks the lldb build with
incomplete switch coverage warnings. I would fix it forward,
but am not familiar enough with lldb to determine the correct
fix.
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:3958:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:4633:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:4889:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
Introduction/Motivation:
LLVM-IR supports integers of non-power-of-2 bitwidth, in the iN syntax.
Integers of non-power-of-two aren't particularly interesting or useful
on most hardware, so much so that no language in Clang has been
motivated to expose it before.
However, in the case of FPGA hardware normal integer types where the
full bitwidth isn't used, is extremely wasteful and has severe
performance/space concerns. Because of this, Intel has introduced this
functionality in the High Level Synthesis compiler[0]
under the name "Arbitrary Precision Integer" (ap_int for short). This
has been extremely useful and effective for our users, permitting them
to optimize their storage and operation space on an architecture where
both can be extremely expensive.
We are proposing upstreaming a more palatable version of this to the
community, in the form of this proposal and accompanying patch. We are
proposing the syntax _ExtInt(N). We intend to propose this to the WG14
committee[1], and the underscore-capital seems like the active direction
for a WG14 paper's acceptance. An alternative that Richard Smith
suggested on the initial review was __int(N), however we believe that
is much less acceptable by WG14. We considered _Int, however _Int is
used as an identifier in libstdc++ and there is no good way to fall
back to an identifier (since _Int(5) is indistinguishable from an
unnamed initializer of a template type named _Int).
[0]https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/software/programmable/quartus-prime/hls-compiler.html)
[1]http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2472.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73967
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Resubmit after fixing MSAN failures caused by incomplete initialization of AutoTypeLocs in TypeSpecLocFiller.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Resubmit after incorrect check in NonTypeTemplateParmDecl broke lldb.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
Summary:
The structural equivalence check stores now pairs of nodes in the
'from' and 'to' context instead of only the node in 'from' context
and a corresponding one in 'to' context. This is needed to handle
cases when a Decl in the 'from' context is to be compared with
multiple Decls in the 'to' context.
Reviewers: martong, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: martong, a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66538
llvm-svn: 370639
Summary:
We falsely state inequivalence if the template parameter is a
qualified/nonquialified template in the first/second instantiation.
Also, different kinds of TemplateName should be equal if the template
decl (if available) is equal (even if the name kind is different).
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64241
llvm-svn: 366818
Summary:
The structural equivalence check reported false eq between lambda classes
with different parameters in their call signature.
The solution is to check the methods for equality too in case of lambda
classes.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64075
llvm-svn: 366332
template name is not visible to unqualified lookup.
In order to support this without a severe degradation in our ability to
diagnose typos in template names, this change significantly restructures
the way we handle template-id-shaped syntax for which lookup of the
template name finds nothing.
Instead of eagerly diagnosing an undeclared template name, we now form a
placeholder template-name representing a name that is known to not find
any templates. When the parser sees such a name, it attempts to
disambiguate whether we have a less-than comparison or a template-id.
Any diagnostics or typo-correction for the name are delayed until its
point of use.
The upshot should be a small improvement of our diagostic quality
overall: we now take more syntactic context into account when trying to
resolve an undeclared identifier on the left hand side of a '<'. In
fact, this works well enough that the backwards-compatible portion (for
an undeclared identifier rather than a lookup that finds functions but
no function templates) is enabled in all language modes.
llvm-svn: 360308
Summary:
Structural equivalence of methods can falsely report false when the
exception specifier is unresolved (i.e unevaluated or not instantiated).
(This caused one assertion during bitcoin ctu-analysis.)
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61424
llvm-svn: 360261
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:
struct S {
template <typename = int> explicit S();
};
struct T : S {};
struct U : T {
U();
};
U::U() {}
$ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
/tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
U::U() {}
^
/tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
because base class 'S' has no default constructor
struct T : S {};
^
1 error generated.
See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.
This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.
> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360024
this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
Changes:
- The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
- The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
- Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
- Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
- The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
- Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
Patch by Tyker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 359949
If an address_space attribute is defined in a macro, print the macro instead
when diagnosing a warning or error for incompatible pointers with different
address_spaces.
We allow this for all attributes (not just address_space), and for multiple
attributes declared in the same macro.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51329
llvm-svn: 359826
Summary:
ODR errors are not necessarily true errors during the import of ASTs.
ASTMerge and CrossTU should use the warning equivalent of every CTU error,
while Sema should emit errors as before.
Reviewers: martong, a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Reviewed By: a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58897
Patch by Endre Fulop!
llvm-svn: 357394
Summary: Operators kind was not checked, so we reported e.g. op- to be equal with op+
Reviewers: shafik, a_sidorin, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57902
llvm-svn: 353504
Summary:
FunctionType::ExtInfo holds such properties of a function which are needed
mostly for code gen. We should not compare these bits when checking for
structural equivalency.
Checking ExtInfo caused false ODR errors during CTU analysis (of tmux).
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53699
llvm-svn: 352050
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
If one definition is currently being defined, we do not compare for
equality and we assume that the decls are equal.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Reviewed By: a_sidorin
Subscribers: gamesh411, shafik, rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53697
llvm-svn: 347564
Summary:
If one definition is currently being defined, we do not compare for
equality and we assume that the decls are equal.
Reviewers: a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53697
llvm-svn: 345760
Summary:
Currently we consider one forward declared RecordDecl and another with a
definition equal. We have to do the same in case of enums.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, r.stahl, xazax.hun
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50444
llvm-svn: 339336
Summary:
When checking a class or function the described class or function template
is checked too.
Split StructuralEquivalenceContext::Finish into multiple functions.
Improved test with symmetric check, added new tests.
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, a_sidorin, bruno
Reviewed By: martong, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49223
llvm-svn: 339256
Summary:
Implementation functions call into the member functions of
ASTStructuralEquivalence, thus they can falsely alter the DeclsToCheck state
(they add decls). This results that some leaf declarations can be stated as
inequivalent as a side effect of one inequivalent element in the DeclsToCheck
list. And since we store the non-equivalencies, any (otherwise independent)
decls will be rendered as non-equivalent. Solution: I tried to clearly
separate the implementation functions (the static ones) and the public
interface. From now on, the implementation functions do not call any public
member functions, only other implementation functions.
Reviewers: a.sidorin, a_sidorin, r.stahl
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49300
llvm-svn: 337275
Summary:
D48773 simplified ASTImporter nicely, but it introduced a new error: Unnamed
structs are not imported correctly, if they appear in a recursive context.
This patch provides a fix for structural equivalency.
Reviewers: a.sidorin, a_sidorin, balazske, gerazo
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49296
llvm-svn: 337267
As listed in the above PRs, vector_size doesn't allow
dependent types/values. This patch introduces a new
DependentVectorType to handle a VectorType that has a dependent
size or type.
In the future, ALL the vector-types should be able to create one
of these to handle dependent types/sizes as well. For example,
DependentSizedExtVectorType could likely be switched to just use
this instead, though that is left as an exercise for the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49045
llvm-svn: 337036
Summary:
Generalize the creation of Decl nodes during Import. With this patch we do the
same things after and before a new AST node is created (::Create) The import
logic should be really simple, we create the node, then we mark that as
imported, then we recursively import the parts for that node and then set them
on that node. However, the AST is actually a graph, so we have to handle
circles. If we mark something as imported (`MapImported()`) then we return with
the corresponding `To` decl whenever we want to import that node again, this way
circles are handled. In order to make this algorithm work we must ensure
things, which are handled in the generic CreateDecl<> template:
* There are no `Import()` calls in between any node creation (::Create)
and the `MapImported()` call.
* Before actually creating an AST node (::Create), we must check if
the Node had been imported already, if yes then return with that one.
One very important case for this is connected to templates: we may
start an import both from the templated decl of a template and from
the template itself.
Now, the virtual `Imported` function is called in `ASTImporter::Impor(Decl *)`,
but only once, when the `Decl` is imported. One point of this refactor is to
separate responsibilities. The original `Imported()` had 3 responsibilities:
- notify subclasses when an import happened
- register the decl into `ImportedDecls`
- initialise the Decl (set attributes, etc)
Now all of these are in separate functions:
- `Imported`
- `MapImported`
- `InitializeImportedDecl`
I tried to check all the clients, I executed tests for `ExternalASTMerger.cpp`
and some unittests for lldb.
Reviewers: a.sidorin, balazske, xazax.hun, r.stahl
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47632
llvm-svn: 336896
Hans Wennborg