not instantiate exception specifications of functions if they were only used in
unevaluated contexts (other than 'noexcept' expressions).
In C++17 onwards, this becomes essential since the exception specification is
now part of the function's type.
Note that this means that constructs like the following no longer work:
struct A {
static T f() noexcept(...);
decltype(f()) *p;
};
... because the decltype expression now needs the exception specification of
'f', which has not yet been parsed.
llvm-svn: 284549
Summary:
Move alpha.valist from potential to alpha since it was implemented in D15227
Cleanup some HTML comments, add a missing link
Reviewers: jordan_rose, zaks.anna
Subscribers: cfe-commits, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25663
llvm-svn: 284445
Instead of ignoring the evaluation order rule, ignore the "destroy parameters
in reverse construction order" rule for the small number of problematic cases.
This only causes incorrect behavior in the rare case where both parameters to
an overloaded operator <<, >>, ->*, &&, ||, or comma are of class type with
non-trivial destructor, and the program is depending on those parameters being
destroyed in reverse construction order.
We could do a little better here by reversing the order of parameter
destruction for those functions (and reversing the argument evaluation order
for all direct calls, not just those with operator syntax), but that is not a
complete solution to the problem, as the same situation can be reached by an
indirect function call.
Approach reviewed off-line by rnk.
llvm-svn: 282777
function correctly when targeting MS ABIs (this appears to have never mattered
prior to this change).
Update test case to always cover both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows ABIs, since
they behave somewhat differently from each other here.
Update test case to also cover operators , && and ||, which it appears are also
affected by P0145R3 (they're not explicitly called out by the design document,
but this is the emergent behavior of the existing wording).
Original commit message:
P0145R3 (C++17 evaluation order tweaks): evaluate the right-hand side of
assignment and compound-assignment operators before the left-hand side. (Even
if it's an overloaded operator.)
This completes the implementation of P0145R3 + P0400R0 for all targets except
Windows, where the evaluation order guarantees for <<, >>, and ->* are
unimplementable as the ABI requires the function arguments are evaluated from
right to left (because parameter destructors are run from left to right in the
callee).
llvm-svn: 282619
assignment and compound-assignment operators before the left-hand side. (Even
if it's an overloaded operator.)
This completes the implementation of P0145R3 + P0400R0 for all targets except
Windows, where the evaluation order guarantees for <<, >>, and ->* are
unimplementable as the ABI requires the function arguments are evaluated from
right to left (because parameter destructors are run from left to right in the
callee).
llvm-svn: 282556
explicit specialization to a warning for C++98 mode (this is a defect report
resolution, so per our informal policy it should apply in C++98), and turn
the warning on by default for C++11 and later. In all cases where it fires, the
right thing to do is to remove the pointless explicit instantiation.
llvm-svn: 280308
Fix the explanation of how to run tests after migration
from autotools to cmake.
Significantly expand the "debugging" section
with more interesting stuff.
Update the table of contents accordingly.
Fix paragraphs in the overview section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22874
llvm-svn: 277029
Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into
C++ last year as a DR against C++11.
Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited
base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to
constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for
using-declarations.
For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived
class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow
constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the
actual initialization, and have a new expression node,
CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such
a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect
forwarding of arguments.)
In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls,
variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting
constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code
into the caller of the inherited constructor.
Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some
corner cases. In particular:
* if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to
construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B
befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and
* if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default
constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from
a base class
llvm-svn: 274049
compiler-rt is optional. We often get email from users with compiler-rt
build errors who don't actually need compiler-rt. Marking it optional
should help them avoid those potential problems.
While I'm here, update a reference to the build directory and remove an
obsolete reference to llvm-gcc. Nobody today is under the impression
that Clang depends on GCC.
llvm-svn: 265963
This is the clang equivalent to llvm commit 264601. When using Visual Studio 2015, cmake now puts the native visualizers in llvm.sln, so the developer automatically sees custom visualizations.
Much thanks to ariccio who provided extensive help on this change. (manual installation still needed on VS2013).
llvm-svn: 264603
Implement lambda capture of *this by copy.
For e.g.:
struct A {
int d = 10;
auto foo() { return [*this] (auto a) mutable { d+=a; return d; }; }
};
auto L = A{}.foo(); // A{}'s lifetime is gone.
// Below is still ok, because *this was captured by value.
assert(L(10) == 20);
assert(L(100) == 120);
If the capture was implicit, or [this] (i.e. *this was captured by reference), this code would be otherwise undefined.
Implementation Strategy:
- amend the parser to accept *this in the lambda introducer
- add a new king of capture LCK_StarThis
- teach Sema::CheckCXXThisCapture to handle by copy captures of the
enclosing object (i.e. *this)
- when CheckCXXThisCapture does capture by copy, the corresponding
initializer expression for the closure's data member
direct-initializes it thus making a copy of '*this'.
- in codegen, when assigning to CXXThisValue, if *this was captured by
copy, make sure it points to the corresponding field member, and
not, unlike when captured by reference, what the field member points
to.
- mark feature as implemented in svn
Much gratitude to Richard Smith for his carefully illuminating reviews!
llvm-svn: 263921
Richard Smith