The patch rL298481 was reverted due to crash on clang-with-lto-ubuntu build.
The reason of the crash was type mismatch between either a or b and RHS in the following situation:
LHS = sext(a +nsw b) > RHS.
This is quite rare, but still possible situation. Normally we need to cast all {a, b, RHS} to their widest type.
But we try to avoid creation of new SCEV that are not constants to avoid initiating recursive analysis that
can take a lot of time and/or cache a bad value for iterations number. To deal with this, in this patch we
reject this case and will not try to analyze it if the type of sum doesn't match with the type of RHS. In this
situation we don't need to create any non-constant SCEVs.
This patch also adds an assertion to the method IsProvedViaContext so that we could fail on it and not
go further into range analysis etc (because in some situations these analyzes succeed even when the passed
arguments have wrong types, what should not normally happen).
The patch also contains a fix for a problem with too narrow scope of the analysis caused by wrong
usage of predicates in recursive invocations.
The regression test on the said failure: test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/implied-via-addition.ll
llvm-svn: 298690
Summary: Fd needs to be closed before the number gets out of scope.
Reviewers: dberris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31278
llvm-svn: 298685
This change allows cross-compiling compiler-rt builtins for
multiple targets as part of runtimes on Darwin. This functionality
is already supported on other platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30957
llvm-svn: 298678
r298178 capitalized the fields in `ArgListEntry`. All the official
targets were updated accordingly, but as an experimental target AVR
was missed.
llvm-svn: 298677
This change fixes a crash on initialization of a reference from ({}) during
template instantiation and incidentally improves diagnostics.
This reverts a prior attempt to handle this in r286721. Instead, we teach the
initialization code that initialization cannot be performed if a source type
is required and the initializer is an initializer list (which is not an
expression and does not have a type), and likewise for function-style cast
expressions.
llvm-svn: 298676
The original code is a big `if` and `else` which ends with `continue`
like this:
if (cond) {
...
// fall through
} else {
...
continue;
}
This patch rewrites it with the following.
if (!cond) {
...
continue;
}
...
llvm-svn: 298672
Summary:
Now that XRay doesn't require a runtime dependency on a C++ standard
library, we remove that dependency from the clang linker flags.
Reviewers: saugustine, pelikan
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31313
llvm-svn: 298670
This prevents crashes when attempting to instrument functions containing
C++ try.
Sanitizer coverage will still fail at runtime when an exception is
thrown through a sancov instrumented function, but that seems marginally
better than what we have now. The full solution is to color the blocks
in LLVM IR and only instrument blocks that have an unambiguous color,
using the appropriate token.
llvm-svn: 298662
Summary:
For the following CFG:
A->B
B->C
A->C
If there is another edge B->D, then ABC should not be considered as triangle.
Reviewers: davidxl, iteratee
Reviewed By: iteratee
Subscribers: nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31310
llvm-svn: 298661
Summary: In DeadArgumentElimination, the call instructions will be replaced. We also need to set the prof weights so that function inlining can find the correct profile.
Reviewers: eraman
Reviewed By: eraman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31143
llvm-svn: 298660
Library functions can have specific semantics that affect the behavior of
certain passes. DSE, for instance, gives special treatment to malloc-ed pointers
but not to pointers returned from an equivalently typed (but differently named)
function.
MetaRenamer ought not to alter program semantics, so library functions must
remain untouched.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, majnemer, chandlerc, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31304
llvm-svn: 298659
Summary: The current prefix based function layout algorithm only looks at function's entry count, which is not sufficient. A function should be grouped together if its entry count or any call edge count is hot.
Reviewers: davidxl, eraman
Reviewed By: eraman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31225
llvm-svn: 298656
- Avoid explosive growth of the simplification queue by not queuing
expressions that are alredy in it.
- Add an iteration counter and abort after a sufficiently large number
of iterations (assuming that it's a symptom of an infinite loop).
llvm-svn: 298655
This could be used to either disable the runtimes build altogether
or avoid building them but still generate the build targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31060
llvm-svn: 298653
This is another step towards implementing register classes with
parametrized register/spill sizes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31299
llvm-svn: 298652
Summary:
This change addresses https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/766. I
tested the change with make check-asan and the newly added test case.
Reviewers: ygribov, kcc, alekseyshl
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits
Patch by mrigger
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30384
llvm-svn: 298650
Summary:
When dumping these records from an object file section, we should use
only one type database. However, when dumping from a PDB, we should use
two: one for the type stream and one for the IPI stream.
Certain type records that normally live in the .debug$T object file
section get moved over to the IPI stream of the PDB file and they get
new indices.
So far, I've noticed that the MSVC linker always moves these records
into IPI:
- LF_FUNC_ID
- LF_MFUNC_ID
- LF_STRING_ID
- LF_SUBSTR_LIST
- LF_BUILDINFO
- LF_UDT_MOD_SRC_LINE
These records have index fields that can point into TPI or IPI. In
particular, LF_SUBSTR_LIST and LF_BUILDINFO point to LF_STRING_ID
records to describe compilation command lines.
I've modified the dumper to have an optional pointer to the item DB, and
to do type name lookup of these fields in that DB. See printItemIndex.
The result is that our pdbdump-headers.test is more faithful to the PDB
contents and the output is less confusing.
Reviewers: ruiu
Subscribers: amccarth, zturner, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31309
llvm-svn: 298649
The old candidate collection method in the outliner caused some very large
regressions in compile time on large tests. For MultiSource/Benchmarks/7zip it
caused a 284.07 s or 1156% increase in compile time. On average, using the
SingleSource/MultiSource tests, it caused an average increase of 8 seconds in
compile time (something like 1000%).
This commit replaces that candidate collection method with a new one which
only visits each node in the tree once. This reduces the worst compile time
increase (still 7zip) to a 0.542 s overhead (22%) and the average compile time
increase on SingleSource and MultiSource to 0.018 s (4%).
llvm-svn: 298648
Summary:
loop unrolling and icp will make the sample profile annotation much harder in the backend. So disable these 2 optimization in the ThinLTO compile phase.
Will add a test in cfe in a separate patch.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31217
llvm-svn: 298646
Now that we call ShrinkDemandedConstant on the RHS of sub this should be taken care of. This code doesn't trigger on any in tree regressions, but did before ShrinkDemandedConstant was added to the RHS.
llvm-svn: 298644
GCC has the alloc_align attribute, which is similar to assume_aligned, except the attribute's parameter is the index of the integer parameter that needs aligning to.
This is the required LLVM changes to make this happen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29598
llvm-svn: 298643
It is not guaranteed that the memory used for MachineBasicBlocks in
the previous MachineFunction hasn't been freed, so holding on to a
pointer to the last function's isn't correct. Particularly I have
observed the sret.ll testcase failing because the first BasicBlock in
the new function happened to be allocated to the exact same memory as
the previously saved and (deleted) PrevInstBB.
llvm-svn: 298642
Daniel Berlin