There is a report in the PR from several months ago that it failed
intermittently, but it is passing consistently for me on FreeBSD 10
and 11. We can re-add a decorator if further testing shows it is
still flakey.
llvm.org/pr17214
llvm-svn: 261340
Both Linux and FreeBSD had a comment "This needs to be root-caused."
It looks like the failure has been fixed on both, and the Linux XFAIL
decorator was removed in r233716 (Mar 2015).
llvm-svn: 261333
on attach uses the architecture it has figured out, rather than the Target's
architecture, which may not have been updated to the correct value yet.
<rdar://problem/24632895>
llvm-svn: 261279
The race condition/use after free involved in setting long prompts
appears to be fixed now (although I do not know which commit fixed it).
llvm.org/pr22611
llvm-svn: 261266
The test fails very rarely. I suspect this is simply because the inferior does not have enough
time to create the file under heavy load.
llvm-svn: 260951
Summary: This is the form on other libc++ tests.
Reviewers: sivachandra
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17230
llvm-svn: 260793
On libc++ std::atomic is a fairly simple data type (layout wise, at least), wrapping actual contents in a member variable named "__a_"
All the formatters are doing is "peel away" this intermediate layer and exposing user data as direct children or values of the std::atomic root variable
Fixes rdar://24329405
llvm-svn: 260752
Summary:
This does not yet give us a clean testsuite run but it does help with:
1. Actually building on linux
2. Run the testsuite with over 70% tests passing on linux.
Reviewers: tfiala, labath, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17182
llvm-svn: 260721
However, they also contain fallback logic that - in cases where LLDB can't recognize the specific subclass - actually does run code in order to inspect those objects.
The argument for this logic was that these data types are critical enough that the risk of getting it wrong is outweighed by the advantage of always providing accurate child information.
Practical experience however shows that "po" - a code running data-inspection command - is quite frequently used, and not considered burdensome by users.
As such, this makes the code-running fallback in the data formatters a risk that carries very little actual reward. Also, unlike the time this code was originally written, we now have accurate class information for Objective-C, and thus we are less likely to improperly identify classes.
This commit removes support for the code-running fallback, and aligns the data formatters for NSArray, NSDictionary and NSSet to the general no-code-running behavior of other data formatters.
While it is possible for us to add support for some subclasses that are now no longer covered by static inspection alone, this is beyond the scope of this commit.
llvm-svn: 260664
clearing the map ended up calling back into the TypeSystemMap to do lookups.
Not a good idea, and in this case it would cause a deadlock.
You would only see this when replacing the target contents after an exec, and only if you
had stopped before the exec, evaluated an expression, then continued
on to the point where you did the exec.
Fixed this by making sure the TypeSystemMap::Clear tears down the TypeSystems in the map before clearing the map.
I also add an expression before exec to the TestExec.py so that we'll catch this
issue if it crops up again in the future.
<rdar://problem/24554920>
llvm-svn: 260624
The explicit APIs on SBValue obviously remain if one wants to be explicit in intent, or override this guess, but since __int__() has to pick one, an educated guess is definitely better than than always going to signed regardless
Fixes rdar://24556976
llvm-svn: 260349
CFLAGS is now being set correctly to pass -flimit-debug-info or
-fno-limit-debug-info on FreeBSD. I'm not sure which change is
responsible for the fix, though.
llvm.org/pr25626
llvm-svn: 260330
This removes the following decorators:
* skipIfI386
* expectedFailureI386
* expectedFailurex86_64
* skipIfArch
* skipUnlessArch
* skipUnlessI386
And other related decorators. All code using those decorators
is updated to use expectedFailureAll and skipIf
llvm-svn: 260178
* Change the `not_in` function to be called `no_match`. This makes
it clear that keyword arguments can be more than just lists.
* Change the name of `_check_list_or_lambda` to
`_match_decorator_property`. Again clarifying that decorator params
are not always lists.
* Always use a regex match when matching strings. This allows automatic
support for regex matching on all decorator properties. Also support
compiled regex values.
* Fix a bug in the compiler check used by _decorateTest. The two
arguments were reversed, the condition was always wrong.
* Change one test that uses skipUnlessArch to use skipIf, to
demonstrate that skipIf can now handle more scenarios.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16938
llvm-svn: 260135
expectedFailureWindows is equivalent to using the general
expectedFailureAll decorator with oslist="windows". Additionally,
by moving towards these common decorators we can solve the issue
of having to support decorators that can be called with or without
arguments. Once all decorators are always called with arguments,
and this is enforced by design (because you can't specify the condition
you're decorating for without passing an argument) the implementation
of the decorators can become much simpler
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16936
llvm-svn: 260134
Obviously, if the original Debugger goes away, those commands are holding on to now stale memory, which has the potential to cause crashes
Fixes rdar://24460882
llvm-svn: 259964
Summary:
This reverts commit 8af14b5f9af68c31ac80945e5b5d56f0a14b38e4.
Reverting as it breaks a few tests on Mac.
Reviewers: spyffe
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16895
llvm-svn: 259823
Summary:
While evaluating expressions when stopped in a class method, there was a
problem of member variables hiding local variables. This was happening
because, in the context of a method, clang already knew about member
variables with their name and assumed that they were the only variables
with those names in scope. Consequently, clang never checks with LLDB
about the possibility of local variables with the same name and goes
wrong. This change addresses the problem by using an artificial
namespace "$__lldb_local_vars". All local variables in scope are
declared in the "$__lldb_expr" method as follows:
using $__lldb_local_vars::<local var 1>;
using $__lldb_local_vars::<local var 2>;
...
This hides the member variables with the same name and forces clang to
enquire about the variables which it thinks are declared in
$__lldb_local_vars. When LLDB notices that clang is enquiring about
variables in $__lldb_local_vars, it looks up local vars and conveys
their information if found. This way, member variables do not hide local
variables, leading to correct evaluation of expressions.
A point to keep in mind is that the above solution does not solve the
problem for one specific case:
namespace N
{
int a;
}
class A
{
public:
void Method();
int a;
};
void
A::Method()
{
using N::a;
...
// Since the above solution only touches locals, it does not
// force clang to enquire about "a" coming from namespace N.
}
Reviewers: clayborg, spyffe
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16746
llvm-svn: 259810
This doesn't attempt to move every decorator. The reason for
this is that it requires touching every single test file to import
decorators.py. I would like to do this in a followup patch, but
in the interest of keeping the patches as bite-sized as possible,
I've only attempted to move the underlying common decorators first.
A few tests call these directly, so those tests are updated as part
of this patch.
llvm-svn: 259807
previously, I have marked only one test as flaky, but now I noticed another test failing with the
same error. I am going to assume all of them are flaky.
llvm-svn: 259775
Summary:
gdb-remote tests are not able to use the same logging mechanisms as the rest of our tests, and
currently we get no host logs from them, even though the tests themselves have logging
capability. This commit changes that. When user specifies that he would like to log the
gdb-remote channel (--channel gdb-remote argument to dotest.py), we write detailed logs to the
<TEST_ID>-host.log file, just like we would in the case of regular tests. If this argument is not
specified, we only log the serious messages to stderr, which matches the existing behaviour.
Reviewers: tfiala, tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16858
llvm-svn: 259774