Summary:
Current PRE hoists common computations into
CMBB = DT->findNearestCommonDominator(MBB, MBB1).
However, if CMBB is in a hot loop body, we might get performance
degradation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64394
llvm-svn: 366570
Summary:
For split-stack, if the nested argument (i.e. R10) is not used, no need to save/restore it in the prologue.
Reviewers: thanm
Reviewed By: thanm
Subscribers: mstorsjo, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64673
llvm-svn: 366569
We'd like to remove this whole function, because these are properties of
functions, not the target as a whole. These two are easy to remove
because they are only used for emitting ARM build attributes, which
expects them to represent the defaults for the whole module, not just
the last function generated.
This is needed to get correct build attributes when using IPRA on ARM,
because IPRA causes resetTargetOptions to get called before
ARMAsmPrinter::emitAttributes.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64929
llvm-svn: 366562
If a function definition is not exact, then the linker could select a
differently-compiled version of it, which could use different registers.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64909
llvm-svn: 366557
Summary:
According to the new Armv8-M specification
https://static.docs.arm.com/ddi0553/bh/DDI0553B_h_armv8m_arm.pdf the
instructions SQRSHRL and UQRSHLL now have an additional immediate
operand <saturate>. The new assembly syntax is:
SQRSHRL<c> RdaLo, RdaHi, #<saturate>, Rm
UQRSHLL<c> RdaLo, RdaHi, #<saturate>, Rm
where <saturate> can be either 64 (the existing behavior) or 48, in
that case the result is saturated to 48 bits.
The new operand is encoded as follows:
#64 Encoded as sat = 0
#48 Encoded as sat = 1
sat is bit 7 of the instruction bit pattern.
This patch adds a new assembler operand class MveSaturateOperand which
implements parsing and encoding. Decoding is implemented in
DecodeMVEOverlappingLongShift.
Reviewers: ostannard, simon_tatham, t.p.northover, samparker, dmgreen, SjoerdMeijer
Reviewed By: simon_tatham
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, pbarrio, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64810
llvm-svn: 366555
Summary:
This patch removes the `default` case from some switches on
`llvm::Triple::ObjectFormatType`, and cases for the missing enumerators
(`UnknownObjectFormat`, `Wasm`, and `XCOFF`) are then added.
For `UnknownObjectFormat`, the effect of the action for the `default`
case is maintained; otherwise, where `llvm_unreachable` is called,
`report_fatal_error` is used instead.
Where the `default` case returns a default value, `report_fatal_error`
is used for XCOFF as a placeholder. For `Wasm`, the effect of the action
for the `default` case in maintained.
The code is structured to avoid strongly implying that the `Wasm` case
is present for any reason other than to make the switch cover all
`ObjectFormatType` enumerator values.
Reviewers: sfertile, jasonliu, daltenty
Reviewed By: sfertile
Subscribers: hiraditya, aheejin, sunfish, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64222
llvm-svn: 366544
Summary:
If we have some pattern that leaves only some low bits set, and then performs
left-shift of those bits, if none of the bits that are left after the final
shift are modified by the mask, we can omit the mask.
There are many variants to this pattern:
f. `((x << MaskShAmt) a>> MaskShAmt) << ShiftShAmt`
All these patterns can be simplified to just:
`x << ShiftShAmt`
iff:
f. `(ShiftShAmt-MaskShAmt) s>= 0` (i.e. `ShiftShAmt u>= MaskShAmt`)
Normally, the inner pattern is sign-extend,
but for our purposes it's no different to other patterns:
alive proofs:
f: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/7U3
For now let's start with patterns where both shift amounts are variable,
with trivial constant "offset" between them, since i believe this is
both simplest to handle and i think this is most common.
But again, there are likely other variants where we could use
ValueTracking/ConstantRange to handle more cases.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42563
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64524
llvm-svn: 366540
Summary:
If we have some pattern that leaves only some low bits set, and then performs
left-shift of those bits, if none of the bits that are left after the final
shift are modified by the mask, we can omit the mask.
There are many variants to this pattern:
e. `((x << MaskShAmt) l>> MaskShAmt) << ShiftShAmt`
All these patterns can be simplified to just:
`x << ShiftShAmt`
iff:
e. `(ShiftShAmt-MaskShAmt) s>= 0` (i.e. `ShiftShAmt u>= MaskShAmt`)
alive proofs:
e: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/0FT
For now let's start with patterns where both shift amounts are variable,
with trivial constant "offset" between them, since i believe this is
both simplest to handle and i think this is most common.
But again, there are likely other variants where we could use
ValueTracking/ConstantRange to handle more cases.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42563
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64521
llvm-svn: 366539
Summary:
If we have some pattern that leaves only some low bits set, and then performs
left-shift of those bits, if none of the bits that are left after the final
shift are modified by the mask, we can omit the mask.
There are many variants to this pattern:
d. `(x & ((-1 << MaskShAmt) >> MaskShAmt)) << ShiftShAmt`
All these patterns can be simplified to just:
`x << ShiftShAmt`
iff:
d. `(ShiftShAmt-MaskShAmt) s>= 0` (i.e. `ShiftShAmt u>= MaskShAmt`)
alive proofs:
d: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/I5Y
For now let's start with patterns where both shift amounts are variable,
with trivial constant "offset" between them, since i believe this is
both simplest to handle and i think this is most common.
But again, there are likely other variants where we could use
ValueTracking/ConstantRange to handle more cases.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42563
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64519
llvm-svn: 366538
Summary:
If we have some pattern that leaves only some low bits set, and then performs
left-shift of those bits, if none of the bits that are left after the final
shift are modified by the mask, we can omit the mask.
There are many variants to this pattern:
c. `(x & (-1 >> MaskShAmt)) << ShiftShAmt`
All these patterns can be simplified to just:
`x << ShiftShAmt`
iff:
c. `(ShiftShAmt-MaskShAmt) s>= 0` (i.e. `ShiftShAmt u>= MaskShAmt`)
alive proofs:
c: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/RgJh
For now let's start with patterns where both shift amounts are variable,
with trivial constant "offset" between them, since i believe this is
both simplest to handle and i think this is most common.
But again, there are likely other variants where we could use
ValueTracking/ConstantRange to handle more cases.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42563
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64517
llvm-svn: 366537
Summary:
If we have some pattern that leaves only some low bits set, and then performs
left-shift of those bits, if none of the bits that are left after the final
shift are modified by the mask, we can omit the mask.
There are many variants to this pattern:
b. `(x & (~(-1 << maskNbits))) << shiftNbits`
All these patterns can be simplified to just:
`x << ShiftShAmt`
iff:
b. `(MaskShAmt+ShiftShAmt) u>= bitwidth(x)`
alive proof:
b: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/y8M
For now let's start with patterns where both shift amounts are variable,
with trivial constant "offset" between them, since i believe this is
both simplest to handle and i think this is most common.
But again, there are likely other variants where we could use
ValueTracking/ConstantRange to handle more cases.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42563
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64514
llvm-svn: 366536
Summary:
If we have some pattern that leaves only some low bits set, and then performs
left-shift of those bits, if none of the bits that are left after the final
shift are modified by the mask, we can omit the mask.
There are many variants to this pattern:
a. `(x & ((1 << MaskShAmt) - 1)) << ShiftShAmt`
All these patterns can be simplified to just:
`x << ShiftShAmt`
iff:
a. `(MaskShAmt+ShiftShAmt) u>= bitwidth(x)`
alive proof:
a: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/wi9
Indeed, not all of these patterns are canonical.
But since this fold will only produce a single instruction
i'm really interested in handling even uncanonical patterns,
since i have this general kind of pattern in hotpaths,
and it is not totally outlandish for bit-twiddling code.
For now let's start with patterns where both shift amounts are variable,
with trivial constant "offset" between them, since i believe this is
both simplest to handle and i think this is most common.
But again, there are likely other variants where we could use
ValueTracking/ConstantRange to handle more cases.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42563
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, huihuiz, xbolva00
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: efriedma, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64512
llvm-svn: 366535
In debug frame information, some fields, e.g., Length in CIE/FDE and
Offset in FDE are attributes to describe the structure of CIE/FDE. They
are not related to the relaxed code. However, these attributes are
symbol differences. So, in current design, these attributes will be
filled as zero and LLVM generates relocations for them.
We only need to generate relocations for symbols in executable sections.
So, if the symbols are not located in executable sections, we still
evaluate their values under relaxation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61584
llvm-svn: 366531
It is necessary to generate fixups in .debug_frame or .eh_frame as
relaxation is enabled due to the address delta may be changed after
relaxation.
There is an opcode with 6-bits data in debug frame encoding. So, we
also need 6-bits fixup types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58335
llvm-svn: 366524
Summary:
Inline asm doesn't use labels when compiled as an object file. Therefore, we
shouldn't create one for the (potential) callbr destination. Instead, use the
symbol for the MachineBasicBlock.
Reviewers: nickdesaulniers, craig.topper
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: xbolva00, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64888
llvm-svn: 366523
I plan on adding memcpy optimizations in the GlobalISel pipeline, but we can't
do that unless we delay lowering to actual function calls. This patch changes
the translator to generate G_INTRINSIC_W_SIDE_EFFECTS for these functions, and
then have each target specify that using the new custom legalizer for intrinsics
hook that they want it expanded it a libcall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64895
llvm-svn: 366516
Add support for folding G_GEPs into loads of the form
```
ldr reg, [base, off]
```
when possible. This can save an add before the load. Currently, this is only
supported for loads of 64 bits into 64 bit registers.
Add a new addressing mode function, `selectAddrModeRegisterOffset` which
performs this folding when it is profitable.
Also add a test for addressing modes for G_LOAD.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64944
llvm-svn: 366503
This is a small extension of !associated, mostly useful for the implementation
convenience of instrumentation passes that RAUW globals with aliases, such
as LowerTypeTests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64951
llvm-svn: 366502
Summary:
Some polish for r365099 which adds a static initializer to
MachOObjectFile. Remove it by moving it to file scope.
Reviewers: smeenai, alexshap, compnerd, mtrent, anushabasana
Reviewed By: smeenai
Subscribers: hiraditya, jkorous, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64873
llvm-svn: 366496
This causes sections with relative pointers to be marked as read only,
which means that they won't end up sharing pages with writable data.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64948
llvm-svn: 366494
While 'd_type' is a non-standard extension to `struct dirent`, only
glibc signals its presence with a macro '_DIRENT_HAVE_D_TYPE'.
However, any platform with 'd_type' also includes a way to convert to
mode_t values using the macro 'DTTOIF', so we can check for that alone
and still be confident that the 'd_type' member exists.
(If this turns out to be wrong, I'll go back and set up an actual
CMake check.)
I couldn't think of how to write a test for this, because I couldn't
think of how to test that a 'stat' call doesn't happen without
controlling the filesystem or intercepting 'stat', and there's no good
cross-platform way to do that that I know of.
Follow-up (almost a year later) to r342089.
rdar://problem/50592673
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64940
llvm-svn: 366486
Summary:
Add `__builtin_wasm_tls_base` so that LeakSanitizer can find the thread-local
block and scan through it for memory leaks.
Reviewers: tlively, aheejin, sbc100
Subscribers: dschuff, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64900
llvm-svn: 366475
Summary:
- As the pointer stripping now tracks through `addrspacecast`, prepare
to handle the bit-width difference from the result pointer.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64928
llvm-svn: 366470
There doesn't seem to be a practical reason for these instructions to have
different restrictions on the types of relocations that they may be used
with, notwithstanding the language in the ELF AArch64 spec that implies that
specific relocations are meant to be used with specific instructions.
For example, we currently forbid the first instruction in the following
sequence, despite it currently being used by clang to generate a global
reference under -mcmodel=large:
movz x0, #:abs_g0_nc:foo
movk x0, #:abs_g1_nc:foo
movk x0, #:abs_g2_nc:foo
movk x0, #:abs_g3:foo
Therefore, allow MOVK/MOVN/MOVZ to accept the union of the set of relocations
that they currently accept individually.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64466
llvm-svn: 366461
It is necessary to generate fixups in .debug_frame or .eh_frame as
relaxation is enabled due to the address delta may be changed after
relaxation.
There is an opcode with 6-bits data in debug frame encoding. So, we
also need 6-bits fixup types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58335
llvm-svn: 366442
This patch enables us to find the source loads for each element, splitting them into a Load and ByteOffset, and attempts to recognise consecutive loads that are in fact from the same source load.
A helper function, findEltLoadSrc, recurses to find a LoadSDNode and determines the element's byte offset within it. When attempting to match consecutive loads, byte offsetted loads then attempt to matched against a previous load that has already been confirmed to be a consecutive match.
Next step towards PR16739 - after this we just need to account for shuffling/repeated elements to create a vector load + shuffle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64551
llvm-svn: 366441
Summary:
Commit r365249 changed usage of FileCheckNumericVariable to have one
instance of that class per variable as opposed to one instance per
definition of a given variable as was done before. However, it retained
the safety check in setValue that it should only be called with the
variable unset, even after r365625.
However this causes assert failure when a non-pseudo variable is being
redefined. And while redefinition of @LINE at each CHECK line work in
the general case, it caused problem when a substitution failed (fixed in
r365624) and still causes problem when a CHECK line does not match since
@LINE's value is cleared after substitutions in match() happened but
printSubstitutions also attempts a substitution.
This commit solves the root of the problem by changing setValue to set a
new value regardless of whether a value was set or not, thus fixing all
the aforementioned issues.
Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson, rnk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, probinson, dblaikie, grimar, arichardson, tra, rnk, kristina, hfinkel, rogfer01, JonChesterfield
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64882
llvm-svn: 366434
LEA doesn't affect flags, so use it more liberally to replace an ADD when
we know that the ADD operands affect flags.
In the motivating example from PR40483:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40483
...this lets us avoid duplicating a math op just to avoid flag conflict.
As mentioned in the TODO comments, this heuristic can be extended to
fire more often if that leads to more improvements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64707
llvm-svn: 366431
Summary:
PerformVMOVRRDCombine ommits adding a offset
of 4 to the PointerInfo, when converting a
f64 = load[M]
to
{i32, i32} = {load[M], load[M + 4]}
Which would allow the machine scheduller
to break dependencies with the second load.
- pr42638
Reviewers: eli.friedman, dmgreen, ostannard
Reviewed By: ostannard
Subscribers: ostannard, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64870
llvm-svn: 366423
I'm not convinced the code this calls is properly vetted for
vXi1 vectors. Experimental vector widening legalization testing
for D55251 is now hitting an assertion failure inside
EltsFromConsecutiveLoads. This is occurring from a v2i1 load
having a store size different than its VT size. Hopefully
this commit will keep such issues from happening.
llvm-svn: 366405
When code relaxation is enabled many RISC-V fixups are not resolved but
instead relocations are emitted. This happens even for DWARF debug
sections. Therefore, to properly support the parsing of DWARF debug info
we need to be able to resolve RISC-V relocations. This patch adds:
* Support for RISC-V relocations in RelocationResolver
* DWARF support for two relocations per object file offset
* DWARF changes to support relocations in more DIE fields
The two relocations per offset change is needed because some RISC-V
relocations (used for label differences) come in pairs.
Relocations can also be emitted for DWARF fields where relocations were
not yet evaluated. Adding relocation support for some of these fields is
essencial. On the other hand, LLVM currently emits RISC-V relocations
for fixups that could be safely evaluated, since they can never be
affected by code relaxations. This patch also adds relocation support
for the fields affected by those extraneous relocations (the DWARF unit
entry Length, and the DWARF debug line entry TotalLength and
PrologueLength), for testing purposes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62062
Patch by Luís Marques.
llvm-svn: 366402
Summary:
LoopInfoWrapperPass::verify uses DT, which means DT must be alive
even if it has no direct users.
Fixes a crash in expensive checks mode.
Reviewers: pcc, leonardchan
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64896
llvm-svn: 366388
After rL365286 I had failing test:
LLVM :: tools/gold/X86/v1.12/thinlto_emit_linked_objects.ll
It was failing with the output:
$ llvm-bcanalyzer --dump llvm/test/tools/gold/X86/v1.12/Output/thinlto_emit_linked_objects.ll.tmp3.o.thinlto.bc
Expected<T> must be checked before access or destruction.
Unchecked Expected<T> contained error:
Unexpected end of file reading 0 of 0 bytesStack dump:
Change-Id: I07e03262074ea5e0aae7a8d787d5487c87f914a2
llvm-svn: 366387
- getCompression() used to return a PDB_SourceCompression even though
the docs for IDiaInjectedSource are explicit about the return value
being compiler-dependent. Return an uint32_t instead, and make the
printing code handle unknown values better by printing "Unknown" and
the int value instead of not printing any compression.
- Print compressed contents as hex dump, not as string.
- Add compression type "DotNet", which is used (at least) by csc.exe,
the C# compiler. Also add a lengthy comment describing the stream
contents (derived from looking at the raw hex contents long enough
to see the GUIDs, which led me to the roslyn and mono implementations
for handling this).
- The native injected source dumper was dumping the contents of the
whole data stream -- but csc.exe writes a stream that's padded with
zero bytes to the next 512 boundary, and the dia api doesn't display
those padding bytes. So make NativeInjectedSource::getCode() do the
same thing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64879
llvm-svn: 366386
This will let us instrument globals during initialization. This required
making the new PM pass a module pass, which should still provide access to
analyses via the ModuleAnalysisManager.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64843
llvm-svn: 366379
The LocalStackSlotPass pre-allocates a stack protector and makes sure
that it comes before the local variables on the stack.
We need to make sure that later during PEI we don't re-allocate a new
stack protector slot. If that happens, the new stack protector slot will
end up being **after** the local variables that it should be protecting.
Therefore, we would have two slots assigned for two different stack
protectors, one at the top of the stack, and one at the bottom. Since
PEI will overwrite the assigned slot for the stack protector, the load
that is used to compare the value of the stack protector will use the
slot assigned by PEI, which is wrong.
For this, we need to check if the object is pre-allocated, and re-use
that pre-allocated slot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64757
llvm-svn: 366371
Extract the sources to the GCD of the original size and target size,
padding with implicit_def as necessary.
Also fix the case where the requested source type is wider than the
original result type. This was ignoring the type, and just using the
destination. Do the operation in the requested type and truncate back.
llvm-svn: 366367
Use an anyext to the requested type for the leftover operand to
produce a slightly wider type, and then truncate the final merge.
I have another implementation almost ready which handles arbitrary
widens, but I think it produces worse code in this example (which I
think is 90% due to not folding redundant copies or folding out
implicit_def users), so I wanted to add this as a baseline first.
llvm-svn: 366366
Implement IR intrinsics for stack tagging. Generated code is very
unoptimized for now.
Two special intrinsics, llvm.aarch64.irg.sp and llvm.aarch64.tagp are
used to implement a tagged stack frame pointer in a virtual register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64172
llvm-svn: 366360
Summary:
Since the target has no significant advantage of vectorization,
vector instructions bous threshold bonus should be optional.
amdgpu-inline-arg-alloca-cost parameter default value and the target
InliningThresholdMultiplier value tuned then respectively.
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, eraman, hiraditya, haicheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64642
llvm-svn: 366348
Summary:
ORCv1 is deprecated. The current aim is to remove it before the LLVM 10.0
release. This patch adds deprecation attributes to the ORCv1 layers and
utilities to warn clients of the change.
Reviewers: dblaikie, sgraenitz, AlexDenisov
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64609
llvm-svn: 366344
Summary:
Deduce the "willreturn" attribute for functions.
For now, intrinsics are not willreturn. More annotation will be done in another patch.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, nicholas, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63046
llvm-svn: 366335
The original behavior was to always emit the offsets to each call site in the
call site table as uleb128 values, however on some architectures (eg RISCV)
these uleb128 offsets into the code cannot always be resolved until link time
(because relaxation will invalidate any calculated offsets), and there are no
appropriate relocations for uleb128 values. As a consequence it needs to be
possible to specify an alternative.
This also switches RISCV to use DW_EH_PE_udata4 for call side encodings in
.gcc_except_table
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63415
Patch by Edward Jones.
llvm-svn: 366329
This patch sets correct encodings for DWARF exception handling for RISC-V
(other than call site encoding, which must be udata4 rather than uleb128 and
is handled by D63415).
This has the same intend as D63409, except this version matches GCC/binutils
behaviour which uses the same encodings regardless of PIC/non-PIC and
medlow/medany code model.
llvm-svn: 366327
Summary:
Missed in the original commit, use the correct callee-saved register
list for spilling, instead of the standard SVR432 list. This avoids
needlessly spilling the SPE non-volatile registers when they're not used.
As part of this, also add where missing, and sort, the spill opcode
checks for SPE and SPE4 register classes.
Reviewers: nemanjai, hfinkel, joerg
Subscribers: kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56703
llvm-svn: 366319
Summary:
Pointed out in a comment for D49754, register spilling will currently
spill SPE registers at almost any offset. However, the instructions
`evstdd` and `evldd` require a) 8-byte alignment, and b) a limit of 256
(unsigned) bytes from the base register, as the offset must fix into a
5-bit offset, which ranges from 0-31 (indexed in double-words).
The update to the register spill test is taken partially from the test
case shown in D49754.
Additionally, pointed out by Kei Thomsen, globals will currently use
evldd/evstdd, though the offset isn't known at compile time, so may
exceed the 8-bit (unsigned) offset permitted. This fixes that as well,
by forcing it to always use evlddx/evstddx when accessing globals.
Part of the patch contributed by Kei Thomsen.
Reviewers: nemanjai, hfinkel, joerg
Subscribers: kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54409
llvm-svn: 366318
Add narrowScalar to half of original size for G_ICMP.
ClampScalar G_ICMP's operands 2 and 3 to to s32.
Select G_ICMP for pointers for MIPS32. Pointer compare is same
as for integers, it is enough to declare them as legal type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64856
llvm-svn: 366317
Migrate CallLowering::lowerReturnVal to use the same infrastructure as
lowerCall/FormalArguments and remove the now obsolete code path from
splitToValueTypes.
Forgot to push this earlier.
llvm-svn: 366308
This directive forces to use the alternate register for context pointer.
For example, this code:
.cplocal $4
jal foo
expands to:
ld $25, %call16(foo)($4)
jalr $25
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64743
llvm-svn: 366300
As well as other LLVM targets we do not handle "offsettable"
memory addresses in any special way. In other words, the "o" constraint
is an exact equivalent of the "m" one. But some existing code require
the "o" constraint support.
This fixes PR42589.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64792
llvm-svn: 366299
AMDGPU needs to allocate special argument registers separately from
the user function argument list, so needs direct control over the
CCState.
The ArgLocs argument is only really necessary because CCState doesn't
allow access to it.
llvm-svn: 366279
Summary:
Currently, on Emscripten, dynamic linking is not supported with threads.
This means that if thread-local storage is used, it must be used in a
statically-linked executable. Hence, local-exec is the only possible model.
This diff compiles all TLS variables to use local-exec on Emscripten as a
temporary measure until dynamic linking is supported with threads.
The goal for this is to allow C++ types with constructors to be thread-local.
Currently, when `clang` compiles a `thread_local` variable with a constructor,
it generates `__tls_guard` variable:
@__tls_guard = internal thread_local global i8 0, align 1
As no TLS model is specified, this is treated as general-dynamic, which we do
not support (and cannot support without implementing dynamic linking support
with threads in Emscripten). As a result, any C++ constructor in `thread_local`
variables would not compile.
By compiling all `thread_local` as local-exec, `__tls_guard` will compile and
we can support C++ constructors with TLS without implementing dynamic linking
with threads.
Depends on D64537
Reviewers: tlively, aheejin, sbc100
Reviewed By: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64776
llvm-svn: 366275
Summary:
Thread local variables are placed inside a `.tdata` segment. Their symbols are
offsets from the start of the segment. The address of a thread local variable
is computed as `__tls_base` + the offset from the start of the segment.
`.tdata` segment is a passive segment and `memory.init` is used once per thread
to initialize the thread local storage.
`__tls_base` is a wasm global. Since each thread has its own wasm instance,
it is effectively thread local. Currently, `__tls_base` must be initialized
at thread startup, and so cannot be used with dynamic libraries.
`__tls_base` is to be initialized with a new linker-synthesized function,
`__wasm_init_tls`, which takes as an argument a block of memory to use as the
storage for thread locals. It then initializes the block of memory and sets
`__tls_base`. As `__wasm_init_tls` will handle the memory initialization,
the memory does not have to be zeroed.
To help allocating memory for thread-local storage, a new compiler intrinsic
is introduced: `__builtin_wasm_tls_size()`. This instrinsic function returns
the size of the thread-local storage for the current function.
The expected usage is to run something like the following upon thread startup:
__wasm_init_tls(malloc(__builtin_wasm_tls_size()));
Reviewers: tlively, aheejin, kripken, sbc100
Subscribers: dschuff, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, jfb, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64537
llvm-svn: 366272
This is part of what is requested by PR42023:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42023
There's an extension needed for FP add, but exactly how we would specify
that using flags is not clear to me, so I left that as a TODO.
We're still missing patterns for partial reductions when the input vector
is 256-bit or 512-bit, but I think that's a failure of vector narrowing.
If we can reduce the widths, then this matching should work on those tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64760
llvm-svn: 366268
D64033 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64033> added DW_AT_call_column for
inline sites. However, that change wasn't aware of "-gno-column-info".
To avoid adding column info when "-gno-column-info" is used, now
DW_AT_call_column is only added when we have non-zero column (when
"-gno-column-info" is used, column will be zero).
Patch by Wenlei He!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64784
llvm-svn: 366264
Summary:
This is exposed by our internal testing.
The reduced testcase will assert with "Impossible reg-to-reg copy"
We can't use COPY to do 32-bit to 64-bit conversion.
Reviewers: kbarton, hfinkel, nemanjai
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: hiraditya, MaskRay, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64499
llvm-svn: 366255
I think this manages to not break the DAG handling with the divergent
predicates because the stadalone divergent patterns end up with a
higher priority than the pattern on the instruction definition.
The 16-bit versions don't work yet.
llvm-svn: 366254
When it is AReg_1024 this results in unnecessary copying into
AGPRs of a 32 element vectors even though they are not intended
for an mfma instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64815
llvm-svn: 366252
Dmitry Preobrazhensky