The ISD::STRICT_ nodes used to implement the constrained floating-point
intrinsics are currently never passed to the target back-end, which makes
it impossible to handle them correctly (e.g. mark instructions are depending
on a floating-point status and control register, or mark instructions as
possibly trapping).
This patch allows the target to use setOperationAction to switch the action
on ISD::STRICT_ nodes to Legal. If this is done, the SelectionDAG common code
will stop converting the STRICT nodes to regular floating-point nodes, but
instead pass the STRICT nodes to the target using normal SelectionDAG
matching rules.
To avoid having the back-end duplicate all the floating-point instruction
patterns to handle both strict and non-strict variants, we make the MI
codegen explicitly aware of the floating-point exceptions by introducing
two new concepts:
- A new MCID flag "mayRaiseFPException" that the target should set on any
instruction that possibly can raise FP exception according to the
architecture definition.
- A new MI flag FPExcept that CodeGen/SelectionDAG will set on any MI
instruction resulting from expansion of any constrained FP intrinsic.
Any MI instruction that is *both* marked as mayRaiseFPException *and*
FPExcept then needs to be considered as raising exceptions by MI-level
codegen (e.g. scheduling).
Setting those two new flags is straightforward. The mayRaiseFPException
flag is simply set via TableGen by marking all relevant instruction
patterns in the .td files.
The FPExcept flag is set in SDNodeFlags when creating the STRICT_ nodes
in the SelectionDAG, and gets inherited in the MachineSDNode nodes created
from it during instruction selection. The flag is then transfered to an
MIFlag when creating the MI from the MachineSDNode. This is handled just
like fast-math flags like no-nans are handled today.
This patch includes both common code changes required to implement the
new features, and the SystemZ implementation.
Reviewed By: andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55506
llvm-svn: 362663
Summary:
The basic idea here is to make it possible to use
MachineInstr::mayAlias also when the MachineInstr
is const (or the "Other" MachineInstr is const).
The addition of const in MachineInstr::mayAlias
then rippled down to the need for adding const
in several other places, such as
TargetTransformInfo::getMemOperandWithOffset.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: hfinkel, MatzeB, arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60856
llvm-svn: 358744
Background: As described in https://reviews.llvm.org/D57601, I'm working towards separating volatile and atomic in the MMO uses for atomic instructions.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D57593, I fixed a bug where isUnordered was returning the wrong result, but didn't account for the fact I was getting slightly ahead of myself. While both uses of isUnordered are correct (as far as I can tell), we don't have tests to demonstrate this and being aggressive gets in the way of having the removal of volatile truly be non-functional. Once D57601 lands, I will return to these call sites, revert this patch, and add the appropriate tests to show the expected behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57802
llvm-svn: 353766
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Currently, instructions doing memory accesses through a base operand that is
not a register can not be analyzed using `TII::getMemOpBaseRegImmOfs`.
This means that functions such as `TII::shouldClusterMemOps` will bail
out on instructions using an FI as a base instead of a register.
The goal of this patch is to refactor all this to return a base
operand instead of a base register.
Then in a separate patch, I will add FI support to the mem op clustering
in the MachineScheduler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54846
llvm-svn: 347746
Moving away from UnknownSize is part of the effort to migrate us to
LocationSizes (e.g. the cleanup promised in D44748).
This doesn't entirely remove all of the uses of UnknownSize; some uses
require tweaks to assume that UnknownSize isn't just some kind of int.
This patch is intended to just be a trivial replacement for all places
where LocationSize::unknown() will Just Work.
llvm-svn: 344186
a generically extensible collection of extra info attached to
a `MachineInstr`.
The primary change here is cleaning up the APIs used for setting and
manipulating the `MachineMemOperand` pointer arrays so chat we can
change how they are allocated.
Then we introduce an extra info object that using the trailing object
pattern to attach some number of MMOs but also other extra info. The
design of this is specifically so that this extra info has a fixed
necessary cost (the header tracking what extra info is included) and
everything else can be tail allocated. This pattern works especially
well with a `BumpPtrAllocator` which we use here.
I've also added the basic scaffolding for putting interesting pointers
into this, namely pre- and post-instruction symbols. These aren't used
anywhere yet, they're just there to ensure I've actually gotten the data
structure types correct. I'll flesh out support for these in
a subsequent patch (MIR dumping, parsing, the works).
Finally, I've included an optimization where we store any single pointer
inline in the `MachineInstr` to avoid the allocation overhead. This is
expected to be the overwhelmingly most common case and so should avoid
any memory usage growth due to slightly less clever / dense allocation
when dealing with >1 MMO. This did require several ergonomic
improvements to the `PointerSumType` to reasonably support the various
usage models.
This also has a side effect of freeing up 8 bits within the
`MachineInstr` which could be repurposed for something else.
The suggested direction here came largely from Hal Finkel. I hope it was
worth it. ;] It does hopefully clear a path for subsequent extensions
w/o nearly as much leg work. Lots of thanks to Reid and Justin for
careful reviews and ideas about how to do all of this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50701
llvm-svn: 339940
The following code pattern:
mov %rax, %rcx
test %rax, %rax
%rax = ....
je throw_npe
mov(%rcx), %r9
mov(%rax), %r10
gets transformed into the following incorrect code after implicit null check pass:
mov %rax, %rcx
%rax = ....
faulting_load_op("movl (%rax), %r10", throw_npe)
mov(%rcx), %r9
For implicit null check pass, if the register that is checked for null value (ie, the register used in the 'test' instruction) is written into before the condition jump, we should avoid doing the optimization.
Patch by Surya Kumari Jangala!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48627
Reviewed By: skatkov
llvm-svn: 336241
r332057 introduced distance() for ranges. Based on post-commit feedback,
this renames distance() to size(). The new size() is also only enabled
when the operation is O(1).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46976
llvm-svn: 332551
This commit adds a wrapper for std::distance() which works with ranges.
As it would be a common case to write `distance(predecessors(BB))`, this
also introduces `pred_size()` and `succ_size()` helpers to make that
easier to write.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46668
llvm-svn: 332057
These command line options are not intended for public use, and often
don't even make sense in the context of a particular tool anyway. About
90% of them are already hidden, but when people add new options they
forget to hide them, so if you were to make a brand new tool today, link
against one of LLVM's libraries, and run tool -help you would get a
bunch of junk that doesn't make sense for the tool you're writing.
This patch hides these options. The real solution is to not have
libraries defining command line options, but that's a much larger effort
and not something I'm prepared to take on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40674
llvm-svn: 319505
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always print registers as lowercase.
* Only debug printing is affected. It now follows MIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40417
llvm-svn: 319187
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
Summary:
It seems that negative offset was accidentally allowed in D17967.
AFAICT small negative offset should be valid (always raise segfault) on all archs that I'm aware of (especially x86, which is the only one with this optimization enabled) and such case can be useful when loading hiden metadata from an object.
However, like the positive side, it should only be done within a certain limit.
For now, use the same limit on the positive side for the negative side.
A separate option can be added if needs appear.
Reviewers: mcrosier, skatkov
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38925
llvm-svn: 315991
It is possible that dependent instruction may access memory.
In this case we must reject optimization because the memory change will
be visible in null handler basic block. So we will execute an instruction which
we must not execute if check fails.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36392
llvm-svn: 310443
Right now areMemoryOpsAliased has an assertion justified as:
MMO1 should have a value due it comes from operation we'd like to use
as implicit null check.
assert(MMO1->getValue() && "MMO1 should have a Value!");
However, it is possible for that invariant to not be upheld in the
following situation (conceptually):
Null check %RAX
NotNullSucc:
%RAX = LEA %RSP, 16 // I0
%RDX = MOV64rm %RAX // I1
With the current code, we will have an early exit from
ImplicitNullChecks::isSuitableMemoryOp on I0 with SR_Unsuitable.
However, I1 will look plausible (since it loads from %RAX) and
will go ahead and call areMemoryOpsAliased(I1, I0). This will cause
us to fail the assert mentioned above since I1 does not load from an
IR level value and thus is allowed to have a non-Value base address.
The fix is to bail out earlier whenever we see an unsuitable
instruction overwrite PointerReg. This would guarantee that when we
call areMemoryOpsAliased, we're guaranteed to be looking at an
instruction that loads from or stores to an IR level value.
Original Patch Author: sanjoy
Reviewers: sanjoy, mkazantsev, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34385
llvm-svn: 305879
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
Rename the DEBUG_TYPE to match the names of corresponding passes where
it makes sense. Also establish the pattern of simply referencing
DEBUG_TYPE instead of repeating the passname where possible.
llvm-svn: 303921
Summary:
With this change ImplicitNullCheck optimization uses alias analysis
and can use load/store memory access for implicit null check if there
are other load/store before but memory accesses do not alias.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30331
llvm-svn: 296440
Summary:
This change allows usage of store instruction for implicit null check.
Memory Aliasing Analisys is not used and change conservatively supposes
that any store and load may access the same memory. As a result
re-ordering of store-store, store-load and load-store is prohibited.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: atrick, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29400
llvm-svn: 294338
Summary:
This change allows a re-order of two intructions if their uses
are overlapped.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29120
llvm-svn: 293775
Summary:
isSuitableMemoryOp method is repsonsible for verification
that instruction is a candidate to use in implicit null check.
Additionally it checks that base register is not re-defined before.
In case base has been re-defined it just returns false and lookup
is continued while any suitable instruction will not succeed this check
as well. This results in redundant further operations.
So when we found that base register has been re-defined we just
stop.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29119
llvm-svn: 293736
Rename from addOperand to just add, to match the other method that has been
added to MachineInstrBuilder for adding more than just 1 operand.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D28057 for the whole discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28556
llvm-svn: 291891
Summary:
This change rewrites a core component in the ImplicitNullChecks pass for
greater simplicity since the original design was over-complicated for no
good reason. Please review this as essentially a new pass. The change
is almost NFC and I've added a test case for a scenario that this new
code handles that wasn't handled earlier.
The implicit null check pass, at its core, is a code hoisting transform.
It differs from "normal" code transforms in that it speculates
potentially faulting instructions (by design), but a lot of the usual
hazard detection logic (register read-after-write etc.) still applies.
We previously detected hazards by keeping track of registers defined and
used by machine instructions over an instruction range, but that was
unwieldy and did not actually confer any performance benefits. The
intent was to have linear time complexity over the number of machine
instructions considered, but it ended up being N^2 is practice.
This new version is more obviously O(N^2) (with N capped to 8 by
default) in hazard detection. It does not attempt to be clever in
tracking register uses or defs (the previous cleverness here was a
source of bugs).
Once this is checked in, I'll extract out the `IsSuitableMemoryOp` and
`CanHoistLoadInst` lambda into member functions (they're too complicated
to be inline lambdas) and do some other related NFC cleanups.
Reviewers: reames, anna, atrick
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27592
llvm-svn: 290394
ImplicitNullCheck keeps track of one instruction that the memory
operation depends on that it also hoists with the memory operation.
When hoisting this dependency, it would sometimes clobber a live-in
value to the basic block we were hoisting the two things out of. Fix
this by explicitly looking for such dependencies.
I also noticed two redundant checks on `MO.isDef()` in IsMIOperandSafe.
They're redundant since register MachineOperands are either Defs or Uses
-- there is no third kind. I'll change the checks to asserts in a later
commit.
llvm-svn: 287213
We don't track callee clobbered registers correctly, so avoid hoisting
across calls.
Note: for this bug to trigger we need a `readonly` call target, since we
already have logic to not hoist across potentially storing instructions
either.
llvm-svn: 287159
Rename AllVRegsAllocated to NoVRegs. This avoids the connotation of
running after register and simply describes that no vregs are used in
a machine function. With that we can simply compute the property and do
not need to dump/parse it in .mir files.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23850
llvm-svn: 279698
This is mostly a mechanical change to make TargetInstrInfo API take
MachineInstr& (instead of MachineInstr* or MachineBasicBlock::iterator)
when the argument is expected to be a valid MachineInstr. This is a
general API improvement.
Although it would be possible to do this one function at a time, that
would demand a quadratic amount of churn since many of these functions
call each other. Instead I've done everything as a block and just
updated what was necessary.
This is mostly mechanical fixes: adding and removing `*` and `&`
operators. The only non-mechanical change is to split
ARMBaseInstrInfo::getOperandLatencyImpl out from
ARMBaseInstrInfo::getOperandLatency. Previously, the latter took a
`MachineInstr*` which it updated to the instruction bundle leader; now,
the latter calls the former either with the same `MachineInstr&` or the
bundle leader.
As a side effect, this removes a bunch of MachineInstr* to
MachineBasicBlock::iterator implicit conversions, a necessary step
toward fixing PR26753.
Note: I updated WebAssembly, Lanai, and AVR (despite being
off-by-default) since it turned out to be easy. I couldn't run tests
for AVR since llc doesn't link with it turned on.
llvm-svn: 274189
When trying to convert a loading instruction into a FAULTING_LOAD, we
sometimes face code like this:
if %R10 is not null:
%R9<def> = MOV32ri Immediate
%R9<def, tied> = AND32rm %R9, 0x20(%R10)
else:
goto TRAP
In these cases we would like to use the AND32rm instruction as the
faulting operation by hoisting the "depedency" def-ing %R9 also above
the control flow, transforming the program into:
%R9<def> = MOV32ri Immediate
%R9<def, tied> = FAULTING_LOAD_OP(AND32rm %R9, 0x20(%R10), FailPath: TRAP)
This change teaches ImplicitNullChecks to do the above, when safe.
llvm-svn: 273501
The replaced load may have implicit-defs and those defs may be used
in the block of the original load. Make sure to update the liveness
accordingly.
This is a generalization of r267817.
llvm-svn: 268412
This operation may branch to the handler block and we do not want it
to happen anywhere within the basic block.
Moreover, by marking it "terminator and branch" the machine verifier
does not wrongly assume (because of AnalyzeBranch not knowing better)
the branch is analyzable. Indeed, the target was seeing only the
unconditional branch and not the faulting load op and thought it was
a simple unconditional block.
The machine verifier was complaining because of that and moreover,
other optimizations could have done wrong transformation!
In the process, simplify the representation of the handler block in
the faulting load op. Now, we directly reference the handler block
instead of using a label. This has the benefits of:
1. MC knows how to issue a label for a BB, so leave that to it.
2. Accessing the target BB from its label is painful, whereas it is
direct from a MBB operand.
Note: The 2 bytes offset in implicit-null-check.ll comes from the
fact the unconditional jumps are not removed anymore, as the whole
terminator sequence is not analyzable anymore.
Will fix it in a subsequence commit.
llvm-svn: 268327
We basically replace:
HoistBB:
cond_br NullBB, NotNullBB
NullBB:
...
NotNullBB:
<reg> = load
into
HoistBB
<reg> = load_faulting_op NullBB
uncond_br NotNullBB
NullBB:
...
NotNullBB: ## <reg> is now live-in of NotNullBB
...
This partially fixes the machine verifier error for
test/CodeGen/X86/implicit-null-check.ll, but it still fails because
of the implicit CFG structure.
llvm-svn: 267817
MachineFunctionProperties represents a set of properties that a MachineFunction
can have at particular points in time. Existing examples of this idea are
MachineRegisterInfo::isSSA() and MachineRegisterInfo::tracksLiveness() which
will eventually be switched to use this mechanism.
This change introduces the AllVRegsAllocated property; i.e. the property that
all virtual registers have been allocated and there are no VReg operands
left.
With this mechanism, passes can declare that they require a particular property
to be set, or that they set or clear properties by implementing e.g.
MachineFunctionPass::getRequiredProperties(). The MachineFunctionPass base class
verifies that the requirements are met, and handles the setting and clearing
based on the delcarations. Passes can also directly query and update the current
properties of the MF if they want to have conditional behavior.
This change annotates the target-independent post-regalloc passes; future
changes will also annotate target-specific ones.
Reviewers: qcolombet, hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18421
llvm-svn: 264593
Ulrich Weigand