It looks like there are two target-independent but not GISel instructions that
need legalization, IMPLICIT_DEF and PHI. These are already anomalies since
their operands have important LLTs attached, so to make things more uniform it
seems like a good idea to add generic variants. Starting with G_IMPLICIT_DEF.
llvm-svn: 306875
This patch adds a new LLVM flag -hexagon-emit-jt-text which is defaulted to
"false". The value "true" emits the switch generated jump tables in text section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34820
llvm-svn: 306872
The llvm flag "-hexagon-emit-lookup-tables" guards the generation
of lookup table from a switch statement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34819
llvm-svn: 306869
This patch appends the name of the function to the switch generated lookup
table. This will ease the visual debugging in identifying the function the table
is generated from.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34817
llvm-svn: 306867
Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D34865.
With the Clang uses of the old spelling having been removed in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34865, get rid of the old "diagnostic hotness"
spellings in favor of the new "diagnostics hotness".
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34866
llvm-svn: 306866
On big-endian machines the high and low parts of the value accessed by ldrexd
and strexd are swapped around. To account for this we swap inputs and outputs
in ISelLowering.
Patch by Bharathi Seshadri.
llvm-svn: 306865
Symbols in the resource COFF file should be for .rsrc$02, where the
actual resource data is, not .rsrc$01, which contains the directory
tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34832
Patch by Joe Ranieri.
llvm-svn: 306853
Previously we had the -type-index option which would dump the record of
a single, but we had no way to follow the dependency graph backwards and
also dump all dependent types.
Having this option makes test-writing better, because we can limit the
test to only those records that are of importance for the thing we're
trying to test, which allows us to use things like CHECK-NEXT to reduce
fragility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34899
llvm-svn: 306852
Summary:
To enable profile hotness information in diagnostics output, Clang takes
the option `-fdiagnostics-show-hotness` -- that's "diagnostics", with an
"s" at the end. Clang also defines `CodeGenOptions::DiagnosticsWithHotness`.
LLVM, on the other hand, defines
`LLVMContext::getDiagnosticHotnessRequested` -- that's "diagnostic", not
"diagnostics". It's a small difference, but it's confusing, typo-inducing, and
frustrating.
Add a new method with the spelling "diagnostics", and "deprecate" the
old spelling.
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34864
llvm-svn: 306848
Summary:
Runtime unrolling is done for loops with a single exit block and a
single exiting block (and this exiting block should be the latch block).
This patch adds logic to support unrolling in the presence of multiple exit
blocks (which also means multiple exiting blocks).
Currently this is under an off-by-default option and is supported when
epilog code is generated. Support in presence of prolog code will be in
a future patch (we just need to add more tests, and update comments).
This patch is essentially an implementation patch. I have not added any
heuristic (in terms of branches added or code size) to decide when
this should be enabled.
Reviewers: mkuper, sanjoy, reames, evstupac
Reviewed by: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33001
llvm-svn: 306846
Summary:
Some transforms assume that DT.verifyDomInfo() is not expensive and call it even when ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS is not set.
This patch disables expensive Dominator Tree verification (reachability, parent property, sibling property) to fix
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33656 | PR33656 ]].
Note that this is only a temporary fix.
Reviewers: dberlin, chapuni, kparzysz, grosser
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34894
llvm-svn: 306839
In particular, use CALL16 (similar to O32) for address loads into T9 for certain
cases. Otherwise use a %got_disp relocation to load the address of a symbol.
Small offsets (small enough to fit in a 16-bit signed immediate) can be used and
are added to the symbol address after it is loaded from the GOT. Larger offsets
are currently unsupported and result in an error from the assembler.
Reviewers: sdardis
Reviewed By: sdardis
Patch by: John Baldwin
Subscribers: llvm-commits, seanbruno, arichardson, emaste, dim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33948
llvm-svn: 306831
Summary:
When linking a regular LTO module, if it has any non-prevailing values
(dropped to available_externally) in comdats, we need to do more than
just remove those values from their comdat. We also remove all values
from that comdat, so as to avoid leaving an incomplete comdat.
This is necessary in case we are compiling in mixed regular and ThinLTO
mode, since the resulting regularLTO native object is always linked into
the final binary first. We need to prevent the linker from selecting an
incomplete comdat that was not the prevailing copy.
Fixes PR32980.
Reviewers: pcc, rafael
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, david2050, llvm-commits, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34803
llvm-svn: 306826
There are a few instructions provided by the high-word facility (z196)
that we cannot easily exploit for code generation. This patch at least
adds those missing instructions for the assembler and disassembler.
This means that now all nonprivileged instructions up to z13 are
supported by the LLVM assembler / disassembler.
llvm-svn: 306821
As discussed in D34087, rewrite areNonVolatileConsecutiveLoads using
generic checks. Also, propagate missing local handling from there to
BaseIndexOffset checks.
Tests of note:
* test/CodeGen/X86/build-vector* - Improved.
* test/CodeGen/BPF/undef.ll - Improved store alignment allows an
additional store merge
* test/CodeGen/X86/clear_upper_vector_element_bits.ll - This is a
case we already do not handle well. Here, the DAG is improved, but
scheduling causes a code size degradation.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, andreadb, filcab
Subscribers: nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34472
llvm-svn: 306819
That may be useful if we want to produce or parse object containing
broken relocation values using yaml2obj/obj2yaml.
Previously that was impossible because only enum values were parsed
correctly, this patch allows to put any numeric value as a
relocation type.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34758
llvm-svn: 306814
In r301116, a custom lowering needed to be introduced to be able to
legalize 8 and 16-bit divisions on ARM targets without a division
instruction, since 2-step legalization (WidenScalar from 8 bit to 32
bit, then Libcall the 32-bit division) doesn't work.
This fixes this and makes this kind of multi-step legalization, where
first the size of the type needs to be changed and then some action is
needed that doesn't require changing the size of the type,
straighforward to specify.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32529
llvm-svn: 306806
It may be detrimental to vectorize loops with very small trip count, as various
costs of the vectorized loop body as well as enclosing overheads including
runtime tests and scalar iterations may outweigh the gains of vectorizing. The
current cost model measures the cost of the vectorized loop body only, expecting
it will amortize other costs, and loops with known or expected very small trip
counts are not vectorized at all. This patch allows loops with very small trip
counts to be vectorized, but under OptForSize constraints, which ensure the cost
of the loop body is dominant, having no runtime guards nor scalar iterations.
Patch inspired by D32451.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34373
llvm-svn: 306803
There are two conditions ORed here with similar checks and each contain two matches that must be true for the if to succeed. With the commutable match on the first half of the OR then both ifs basically have the same first part and only the second part distinguishs. With this change we move the commutable match to second half and make the first half unique.
This caused some tests to change because we now produce a commuted result, but this shouldn't matter in practice.
llvm-svn: 306800
It served us well, helped kick-start much of the vectorization efforts
in LLVM, etc. Its time has come and past. Back in 2014:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2014-November/079091.html
Time to actually let go and move forward. =]
I've updated the release notes both about the removal and the
deprecation of the corresponding C API.
llvm-svn: 306797
In rL300494 there was an attempt to deal with excessive compile time on
invocations of getSign/ZeroExtExpr using local caching. This approach only
helps if we request the same SCEV multiple times throughout recursion. But
in the bug PR33431 we see a case where we request different values all the time,
so caching does not help and the size of the cache grows enormously.
In this patch we remove the local cache for this methods and add the recursion
depth limit instead, as we do for arithmetics. This gives us a guarantee that the
invocation sequence is limited and reasonably short.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34273
llvm-svn: 306785
These overloads are essentially dead, and pose a maintenance cost
without adding any benefit. This is coming up now because I'd like to
experiment with changing the way we store coverage mapping data, and
would rather not have to fix up the old overloads while doing so.
Testing: check-{llvm,profile}, build clang.
llvm-svn: 306776
Previously it doesn't actually invoke the designated new PM builder
functions.
This patch moves NameAnonGlobalPass out from PassBuilder, as Chandler
points out that PassBuilder is used for non-O0 builds, and for
optimizations only.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34728
llvm-svn: 306756
Summary:
Arguably non-integral pointers probably shouldn't show up here at all,
but since the backend doesn't complain and this takes valid (according
to the Verifier) IR and makes it invalid, make sure not to introduce
any inttoptr instructions if we're dealing with non-integral pointers.
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33110
llvm-svn: 306737
Tim Northover