Summary:
This patch fixes pr23772 [ARM] r226200 can emit illegal thumb2 instruction: "sub sp, r12, #80".
The violation was that SUB and ADD (reg, immediate) instructions can only write to SP if the source register is also SP. So the above instructions was unpredictable.
To enforce that the instruction t2(ADD|SUB)ri does not write to SP we now enforce the destination register to be rGPR (That exclude PC and SP).
Different than the ARM specification, that defines one instruction that can read from SP, and one that can't, here we inserted one that can't write to SP, and other that can only write to SP as to reuse most of the hard-coded size optimizations.
When performing this change, it uncovered that emitting Thumb2 Reg plus Immediate could not emit all variants of ADD SP, SP #imm instructions before so it was refactored to be able to. (see test/CodeGen/Thumb2/mve-stacksplot.mir where we use a subw sp, sp, Imm12 variant )
It also uncovered a disassembly issue of adr.w instructions, that were only written as SUBW instructions (see llvm/test/MC/Disassembler/ARM/thumb2.txt).
Reviewers: eli.friedman, dmgreen, carwil, olista01, efriedma, andreadb
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: gbedwell, john.brawn, efriedma, ostannard, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70680
Summary:
As disscused in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43219,
i believe it may be somewhat useful to show //some// aggregates
over all the sea of statistics provided.
Example:
```
Average Wait times (based on the timeline view):
[0]: Executions
[1]: Average time spent waiting in a scheduler's queue
[2]: Average time spent waiting in a scheduler's queue while ready
[3]: Average time elapsed from WB until retire stage
[0] [1] [2] [3]
0. 3 1.0 1.0 4.7 vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm2
1. 3 2.7 0.0 2.3 vhaddps %xmm2, %xmm2, %xmm3
2. 3 6.0 0.0 0.0 vhaddps %xmm3, %xmm3, %xmm4
3 3.2 0.3 2.3 <total>
```
I.e. we average the averages.
Reviewers: andreadb, mattd, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: gbedwell, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68714
llvm-svn: 374361
This adds a -mattr flag to llvm-mca, for cases where the -mcpu option does not
contain all optional features.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68190
llvm-svn: 373358
By default, llvm-mca conservatively assumes that a register operand from the
variadic sequence is both a register read and a register write. That is because
MCInstrDesc doesn't describe extra variadic operands; we don't have enough
dataflow information to tell which register operands from the variadic sequence
is a definition, and which is a use instead.
However, if a variadic instruction is flagged 'mayStore' (but not 'mayLoad'),
and it has no 'unmodeledSideEffects', then llvm-mca (very) optimistically
assumes that any register operand in the variadic sequence is a register read
only. Conversely, if a variadic instruction is marked as 'mayLoad' (but not
'mayStore'), and it has no 'unmodeledSideEffects', then llvm-mca optimistically
assumes that any extra register operand is a register definition only.
These assumptions work quite well for variadic load/store multiple instructions
defined by the ARM backend.
llvm-svn: 347522
`llvm-mca` relies on the predicates to be based on `MCSchedPredicate` in order
to resolve the scheduling for variant instructions. Otherwise, it aborts
the building of the instruction model early.
However, the scheduling model emitter in `TableGen` gives up too soon, unless
all processors use only such predicates.
In order to allow more processors to be used with `llvm-mca`, this patch
emits scheduling transitions if any processor uses these predicates. The
transition emitted for the processors using legacy predicates is the one
specified with `NoSchedPred`, which is based on `MCSchedPredicate`.
Preferably, `llvm-mca` should instead assume a reasonable default when a
variant transition is not based on `MCSchedPredicate` for a given processor.
This issue should be revisited in the future.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54648
llvm-svn: 347504
With this change, InstrBuilder emits an error if the MCInst sequence contains an
instruction with a variadic opcode, and a non-zero number of variadic operands.
Currently we don't know how to correctly analyze variadic opcodes. The problem
with variadic operands is that there is no information for them in the opcode
descriptor (i.e. MCInstrDesc). That means, we don't know which variadic operands
are defs, and which are uses.
In future, we could try to conservatively assume that any extra register
operands is both a register use and a register definition.
This patch fixes a subtle bug in the evaluation of read/write operands for ARM
VLD1 with implicit index update. Added test vld1-index-update.s
llvm-svn: 347503
A new class named InstructionError has been added to Support.h in order to
improve the error reporting from class InstrBuilder.
The llvm-mca driver is responsible for handling InstructionError objects, and
printing them out to stderr.
The goal of this patch is to remove all the remaining error handling logic from
the library code.
In particular, this allows us to:
- Simplify the logic in InstrBuilder by removing a needless dependency from
MCInstrPrinter.
- Centralize all the error halding logic in a new function named 'runPipeline'
(see llvm-mca.cpp).
This is also a first step towards generalizing class InstrBuilder, so that in
future, we will be able to reuse its logic to also "lower" MachineInstr to
mca::Instruction objects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53585
llvm-svn: 345129
This patch adds two new fields to the perf report generated by the SummaryView.
Fields are now logically organized into two small groups; only the second group
contains throughput indicators.
Example:
```
Iterations: 100
Instructions: 300
Total Cycles: 414
Total uOps: 700
Dispatch Width: 4
uOps Per Cycle: 1.69
IPC: 0.72
Block RThroughput: 4.0
```
This patch also updates the docs for llvm-mca.
Due to the nature of this change, several tests in the tools/llvm-mca directory
were affected, and had to be updated using script `update_mca_test_checks.py`.
llvm-svn: 340946
Previously update_mca_test_checks worked entirely at "block" level where
a block is some sequence of lines delimited by at least one empty line.
This generally worked well, but could sometimes lead to excessive
repetition of check lines for various prefixes if some block was almost
identical between prefixes, but not quite (for example, due to a
different dispatch width in the otherwise identical summary views).
This new analyis attempts to split blocks further in the case where the
following conditions are met:
a) There is some prefix common to every RUN line (typically 'ALL').
b) The first line of the block is common to the output with every prefix.
c) The block has the same number of lines for the output with every prefix.
Also, regenerated all llvm-mca test files with the following command:
update_mca_test_checks.py "../test/tools/llvm-mca/*/*.s" "../test/tools/llvm-mca/*/*/*.s"
The new analysis showed a "multiple lines not disambiguated by prefixes" warning
for test "AArch64/Exynos/scheduler-queue-usage.s" so I've also added some
explicit prefixes to each of the RUN lines in that test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47321
llvm-svn: 333204
llvm-mca is an LLVM based performance analysis tool that can be used to
statically measure the performance of code, and to help triage potential
problems with target scheduling models.
llvm-mca uses information which is already available in LLVM (e.g. scheduling
models) to statically measure the performance of machine code in a specific cpu.
Performance is measured in terms of throughput as well as processor resource
consumption. The tool currently works for processors with an out-of-order
backend, for which there is a scheduling model available in LLVM.
The main goal of this tool is not just to predict the performance of the code
when run on the target, but also help with diagnosing potential performance
issues.
Given an assembly code sequence, llvm-mca estimates the IPC (instructions per
cycle), as well as hardware resources pressure. The analysis and reporting style
were mostly inspired by the IACA tool from Intel.
This patch is related to the RFC on llvm-dev visible at this link:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-March/121490.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43951
llvm-svn: 326998
Diogo Sampaio