At least the plugin used by the LibreOffice build
(<https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Clang_plugins>) indirectly
uses those members (through inline functions in LLVM/Clang include files in turn
using them), but they are not exported by utils/extract_symbols.py on Windows,
and accessing data across DLL/EXE boundaries on Windows is generally
problematic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26671
llvm-svn: 289647
Summary: This code was probably needed to support VS2013 and is not needed now. I have built it with VS and mingw. Ok to remove it?
Reviewers: zturner, abidh
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27707
llvm-svn: 289644
I'm transitioning away from my current employer, and I do not foresee myself
spending much time on LLDB in the near future. Ideally somebody on the Google
Android team takes over the gdb-remote protocol tests, and somebody with decent
familiarity with the test suite infrastructure takes over the parallel test
runner and test event stream portions of the Python test suite.
llvm-svn: 289479
We don't parse ObjC v1 types from the runtime metadata like we do for ObjC v2, but doing so by creating empty types was ruining the i386 v1 debugging experience.
<rdar://problem/24093343>
llvm-svn: 289233
This test links against liblldb, so it can only run when the target arch is the
same arch as liblldb. We already have a decorator for that, so apply it.
While I'm in there, also mark the test as debug-info independent.
llvm-svn: 289199
I found the race condition in:
ScriptInterpreter *CommandInterpreter::GetScriptInterpreter(bool can_create);
More than one "ScriptInterpreter *" was being returned due to the race which caused any clients with the first one to now be pointing to freed memory and we would quickly crash.
Added a test to catch this so we don't regress.
<rdar://problem/28356584>
llvm-svn: 289169
ThreadList had an assignment operator that didn't lock the "rhs" thread list object. This means a thread list can be mutated while it is being copied.
The copy constructor calls the assignment operator as well. So this fixes the unsafe threaded access to ThreadList which we believe is responsible for a lot of crashes.
<rdar://problem/28075793>
llvm-svn: 289100
to not be set by Process::WillPublicStop() so the driver won't get
access to them. The fix is straightforward, moving the call to
WillPublicStop above the early return for the interrupt case. (the
interrupt case does an early return because the rest of the function
is concerned with running stop hooks etc and those are not applicable
when we've interrupted the process).
Also added a test case for it. The test case is a little complicated
because I needed to drive lldb asynchronously to give the program
a chance to get up and running before I interrupt it. Running to
a breakpoint was not sufficient to catch this bug.
<rdar://problem/22693778>
llvm-svn: 289026
In the process, discovered a bug related to the use of an
uninitialized-pointer, and fixed as suggested by Enrico
in an lldb-dev mailing list thread.
llvm-svn: 289015
LLVM build trees export the gtest library through a special export set. If you're building against a build tree you shouldn't need to re-add gtest, but if you're building against an installed LLVM you do.
llvm-svn: 288691
This diff
1. Adds a comment to ObjectFileELF.cpp about the current
approach to determining the OS.
2. Replaces the check in SymbolFileDWARF.cpp with a more robust one.
Test plan:
Built (on Linux) a test binary linked to a c++ shared library
which contains just an implementation of a function TestFunction,
the library (the binary itself) doesn't contain ELF notes
and EI_OSABI is set to System V.
Checked in lldb that now "p TestFunction()" works fine
(and doesn't work without this patch).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27380
llvm-svn: 288687
Rationale:
scripts/Python/modules: android is excluded at a higher level, so no point in
checking here
tools/lldb-mi: lldb-mi builds fine (with some cosmetic tweaks) on android, and
there is no reason it shouldn't.
tools/lldb-server: LLDB_DISABLE_LIBEDIT/CURSES already take the platform into
account, so there is no point in checking again.
I am reasonably confident this should not break the build on any platform, but
I'll keep an eye out on the bots.
llvm-svn: 288661
In r288065, we added more report types into ASan that will be reported via the debugging API. This patch in LLDB provides human-friendly bug descriptions. This also improves wording on existing bug descriptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27017
llvm-svn: 288535
Summary:
This replaces all the uses of the __ANDROID_NDK__ define with __ANDROID__. This
is a preparatory step to remove our custom android toolchain file and rely on
the standard android NDK one instead, which does not provide this define.
Instead I rely, on __ANDROID__, which is set by the compiler.
I haven't yet removed the cmake variable with the same name, as we will need to
do something completely different there -- NDK toolchain defines
CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME to Android, while our current one pretends it's linux.
Reviewers: tberghammer, zturner
Subscribers: danalbert, srhines, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27305
llvm-svn: 288494
We have a longstanding issue where the expression parser does not handle wide CFStrings (e.g., @"凸凹") correctly, producing the useless error message
Internal error [IRForTarget]: An Objective-C constant string's string initializer is not an array
error: warning: expression result unused
error: The expression could not be prepared to run in the target
This is just a side effect of the fact that we don't handle wide string constants when converting these to CFStringCreateWithBytes. That function takes the string's encoding as an argument, so I made it work and added a testcase.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27291
<rdar://problem/13190557>
llvm-svn: 288386
Summary:
The fix is to make sure llvm does not pull in dlopen() in configurations where it
is not available.
Reviewers: tberghammer, beanz
Subscribers: danalbert, srhines, lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26505
llvm-svn: 288331
Summary:
Since the function is way too big already, I tried at least to factor out the
timeout computation stuff into a separate function. I've tried to make the new
code semantically equivalent, and it also makes sense when I look at it as a done
deal.
Reviewers: jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27258
llvm-svn: 288326
The core of the function was actually handling them correctly. However, the
early exit was being too optimistic and did not give the function a chance to
fire if the path did not contain dots as well.
Fix that and add a couple of unit tests.
llvm-svn: 288247
This changes most of the class to use the new Timeout class. The one function
left is RunThreadPlan, which I left for a separate change as the function is
massive. A couple of things to call out:
- I've renamed the affected functions to match the listener interface names. This
should also help catch any places I did not convert at compile time.
- I've deleted the WaitForState function as it was unused.
llvm-svn: 288241
Summary:
Communication classes use the Timeout<> class to specify the timeout. Listener
class was converted to chrono some time ago, but it used a different meaning for
a timeout of zero (Listener: infinite wait, Communication: no wait). Instead,
Listener provided separate functions which performed a non-blocking event read.
This converts the Listener class to the new Timeout class, to improve
consistency. It also allows us to get merge the different GetNextEvent*** and
WaitForEvent*** functions into one. No functional change intended.
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27136
llvm-svn: 288238
We were referencing a the process class from a register context, which seems
intuitively wrong. Also, the comment above that code is now definitely incorrect,
as ProcessElfCore now does support floating point registers. Also, the code
wasn't really doing anything, as it was just skipping a zero-initialization of a
field that was most likely zero-initialized anyway. Linux elf core FPR test still
passes after this.
llvm-svn: 288237
Stephan Bergmann