While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on
top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies:
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design
but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM
experts.
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot
be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes.
This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation.
- catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward.
It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other
funclets.
- The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of
control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully
analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal
nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when
they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a
representation which forbade them upfront.
Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following:
- Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control
flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable.
- Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model
the constraints of funclet oriented EH.
- Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume
the token produced by the funclet which contains them.
- Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred
implicitly using coloring information.
N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the
veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a
look to make sure the results are reasonable.
Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139
llvm-svn: 255422
Terrifyingly, one of them is a mishandling of floating point vectors
in Constant::isZero(). How exactly this issue survived this long
is beyond me.
llvm-svn: 253655
We sometimes create intermediate subtract instructions during
reassociation. Adding these to the worklist to revisit exposes many
additional reassociation opportunities.
Patch by Aditya Nandakumar.
llvm-svn: 253240
Remove remaining `ilist_iterator` implicit conversions from
LLVMScalarOpts.
This change exposed some scary behaviour in
lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp around line 1770. This patch changes a
call from `Function::begin()` to `&Function::front()`, since the return
was immediately being passed into another function that takes a
`Function*`. `Function::front()` started to assert, since the function
was empty. Note that `Function::end()` does not point at a legal
`Function*` -- it points at an `ilist_half_node` -- so the other
function was getting garbage before. (I added the missing check for
`Function::isDeclaration()`.)
Otherwise, no functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 250211
GlobalsAA must by definition be preserved in function passes, but the passmanager doesn't know that. Make each pass explicitly preserve GlobalsAA.
llvm-svn: 247263
Some personality routines require funclet exit points to be clearly
marked, this is done by producing a token at the funclet pad and
consuming it at the corresponding ret instruction. CleanupReturnInst
already had a spot for this operand but CatchReturnInst did not.
Other personality routines don't need to use this which is why it has
been made optional.
llvm-svn: 245149
iisUnmovableInstruction() had a list of instructions hardcoded which are
considered unmovable. The list lacked (at least) an entry for the va_arg
and cmpxchg instructions.
Fix this by introducing a new Instruction::mayBeMemoryDependent()
instead of maintaining another instruction list.
Patch by Matthias Braun <matze@braunis.de>.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11577
rdar://problem/22118647
llvm-svn: 244244
Reassociate mutated existing instructions in order to form negations
which would create additional reassociate opportunities.
This fixes PR23926.
llvm-svn: 240593
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
If the type isn't trivially moveable emplace can skip a potentially
expensive move. It also saves a couple of characters.
Call sites were found with the ASTMatcher + some semi-automated cleanup.
memberCallExpr(
argumentCountIs(1), callee(methodDecl(hasName("push_back"))),
on(hasType(recordDecl(has(namedDecl(hasName("emplace_back")))))),
hasArgument(0, bindTemporaryExpr(
hasType(recordDecl(hasNonTrivialDestructor())),
has(constructExpr()))),
unless(isInTemplateInstantiation()))
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 238602
Canonicalizing 'x [+-] (-Constant * y)' is not a win if we don't *know*
we will open up CSE opportunities.
If the multiply was 'nsw', then negating 'y' requires us to clear the
'nsw' flag. If this is actually worth pursuing, it is probably more
appropriate to do so in GVN or EarlyCSE.
This fixes PR23675.
llvm-svn: 238397
This reapplies the patch previously committed at revision 232190. This was
reverted at revision 232196 as it caused test failures in tests that did not
expect operands to be commuted. I have made the tests more resilient to
reassociation in revision 232206.
llvm-svn: 232209
This patch adds initial support for vector instructions to the reassociation
pass. It enables most parts of the pass to work with vectors but to keep the
size of the patch small, optimization of Xor trees, canonicalization of
negative constants and converting shifts to muls, etc., have been left out.
This will be handled in later patches.
The patch is based on an initial patch by Chad Rosier.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7566
llvm-svn: 232190
Summary:
When trying to canonicalize negative constants out of
multiplication expressions, we need to check that the
constant is not INT_MIN which cannot be negated.
Reviewers: mcrosier
Reviewed By: mcrosier
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7286
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 228872
The alloca's type is irrelevant, only those types which are used in a
load or store of the exact size of the slice should be considered.
This manifested as an assertion failure when we compared the various
types: we had a size mismatch.
This fixes PR21480.
llvm-svn: 222499
This reverts commit r222142. This is causing/exposing an execution-time regression
in spec2006/gcc and coremark on AArch64/A57/Ofast.
Conflicts:
test/Transforms/Reassociate/optional-flags.ll
llvm-svn: 222398
This is to be consistent with StringSet and ultimately with the standard
library's associative container insert function.
This lead to updating SmallSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update SmallPtrSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update all the existing users of those functions...
llvm-svn: 222334
Prior to this commit fmul and fadd binary operators were being canonicalized for
both scalar and vector versions. We now canonicalize add, mul, and, or, and xor
vector instructions.
llvm-svn: 222006
This is a reapplication of r221171, but we only perform the transformation
on expressions which include a multiplication. We do not transform rem/div
operations as this doesn't appear to be safe in all cases.
llvm-svn: 221721
instructions. Inlining might cause such cases and it's not valid to
reassociate floating-point instructions without the unsafe algebra flag.
Patch by Mehdi Amini <mehdi_amini@apple.com>!
llvm-svn: 221462
Particularly, it addresses cases where Reassociate breaks Subtracts but then fails to optimize combinations like I1 + -I2 where I1 and I2 have the same rank and are identical.
Patch by Dmitri Shtilman.
llvm-svn: 219092
This does not require -ffast-math, and it gives CSE/GVN more options to
eliminate duplicate expressions in, e.g.:
return ((x + 0.1234 * y) * (x - 0.1234 * y));
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4904
llvm-svn: 216169
Handle "X + ~X" -> "-1" in the function Value *Reassociate::OptimizeAdd(Instruction *I, SmallVectorImpl<ValueEntry> &Ops);
This patch implements:
TODO: We could handle "X + ~X" -> "-1" if we wanted, since "-X = ~X+1".
Patch by Rahul Jain!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3835
llvm-svn: 209973
definition below all of the header #include lines, lib/Transforms/...
edition.
This one is tricky for two reasons. We again have a couple of passes
that define something else before the includes as well. I've sunk their
name macros with the DEBUG_TYPE.
Also, InstCombine contains headers that need DEBUG_TYPE, so now those
headers #define and #undef DEBUG_TYPE around their code, leaving them
well formed modular headers. Fixing these headers was a large motivation
for all of these changes, as "leaky" macros of this form are hard on the
modules implementation.
llvm-svn: 206844
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
llvm-svn: 203364
Move the test for this class into the IR unittests as well.
This uncovers that ValueMap too is in the IR library. Ironically, the
unittest for ValueMap is useless in the Support library (honestly, so
was the ValueHandle test) and so it already lives in the IR unittests.
Mmmm, tasty layering.
llvm-svn: 202821
Sanjay Patel