Summary:
According to the Google C++ Style Guide, constructors taking a single
std::initializer_list<> should not be marked explicit.
This change also changes the messages according to conventions used in Clang
diagnostics: no capitalization of the first letter, no trailing dot.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: curdeius, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6427
llvm-svn: 222878
Summary:
This adds a support for the .clang-tidy file reading using
FileOptionsProvider, -dump-config option, and changes tests to not depend on
default checks set.
Reviewers: klimek, bkramer, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5186
llvm-svn: 217155
Imagine, hypothetically, that you had a build of clang-tidy that enabled
the google-* checks by default. If you had such a binary, then this
test would fail. Making it pass in that configuration isn't such a bad
thing.
llvm-svn: 213085
Summary:
This patch removes " [check-name]" from the end of
ClangTidyMessage::Message. The " [check-name]" part is only appended when
printing diagnostics on the console. Clang errors are now marked with
"clang-diagnostic-error" check name, remarks and unknown warnings are marked
with "clang-diagnostic-unknown".
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4356
llvm-svn: 212180
Summary:
No filters should affect the display of errors. Fixed a few tests,
which had compile errors.
We need to think what we should do with mapped errors (-Werror).
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3982
llvm-svn: 210044
Summary:
This seems like a more appropriate reaction to the user specifying a
single check with a wrong name, for example.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3981
llvm-svn: 210043
Summary:
Make checks filtering more intuitive and easy to use. Remove
-disable-checks and change the format of -checks= to a comma-separated list of
globs with optional '-' prefix to denote exclusion. The -checks= option is now
cumulative, so it modifies defaults, not overrides them. Each glob adds or
removes to the current set of checks, so the filter can be refined or overriden
by adding globs.
Example:
The default value for -checks= is
'*,-clang-analyzer-alpha*,-llvm-include-order,-llvm-namespace-comment,-google-*',
which allows all checks except for the ones named clang-analyzer-alpha* and
others specified with the leading '-'. To allow all google-* checks one can
write:
clang-tidy -checks=google-* ...
If one needs only google-* checks, we first need to remove everything (-*):
clang-tidy -checks=-*,google-*
etc.
I'm not sure if we need to change something here, so I didn't touch the docs
yet.
Reviewers: klimek, alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3770
llvm-svn: 208883
Also make tests slightly less dependent on default flags. Once we have
implemented configuration file support, we might want to store the
clang-tidy configuration for the tests there.
llvm-svn: 205408
Summary:
This patch implements filtering of clang-tidy diagnostic messages by
the check name, so that "clang-tidy -checks=^llvm-" won't output any clang
warnings, for example. This is also helpful to run specific static-analyzer
checks: static analyzer always needs core checks to be enabled, but the user may
be interested only in the checks he asked for.
This patch also exposes warning option names for built-in diagnostics. We need
to have a namespace for these names to avoid collisions and to allow convenient
filtering, so I prefix them with "-W". I'm not sure it's the best thing to do,
and maybe "W" or "clang-diagnostic-" or something like this would be better.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3121
llvm-svn: 204321
Alexander Kornienko