This was an experimental option, but needs to be defined
per-target. e.g. PPC A2 needs to aggressively hide latency.
I converted some in-order scheduling tests to A2. Hal is working on
more test cases.
llvm-svn: 171946
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
This was found by MSVC10's STL debug mode on a test from the test suite. Sadly
std::is_heap isn't standard so there is no way to assert this without writing
our own heap verify, which looks like overkill to me.
llvm-svn: 168885
This is a simple, cheap infrastructure for analyzing the shape of a
DAG. It recognizes uniform DAGs that take the shape of bottom-up
subtrees, such as the included matrix multiplication example. This is
useful for heuristics that balance register pressure with ILP. Two
canonical expressions of the heuristic are implemented in scheduling
modes: -misched-ilpmin and -misched-ilpmax.
llvm-svn: 168773
This allows me to begin enabling (or backing out) misched by default
for one subtarget at a time. To run misched we typically want to:
- Disable SelectionDAG scheduling (use the source order scheduler)
- Enable more aggressive coalescing (until we decide to always run the coalescer this way)
- Enable MachineScheduler pass itself.
Disabling PostRA sched may follow for some subtargets.
llvm-svn: 167826
Uses the infrastructure from r167742 to support clustering instructure
that the target processor can "fuse". e.g. cmp+jmp.
Next step: target hook implementations with test cases, and enable.
llvm-svn: 167744
This infrastructure is generally useful for any target that wants to
strongly prefer two instructions to be adjacent after scheduling.
A following checkin will add target-specific hooks with unit
tests. Then this feature will be enabled by default with misched.
llvm-svn: 167742
This adds support for weak DAG edges to the general scheduling
infrastructure in preparation for MachineScheduler support for
heuristics based on weak edges.
llvm-svn: 167738
misched is disabled by default. With -enable-misched, these heuristics
balance the schedule to simultaneously avoid saturating processor
resources, expose ILP, and minimize register pressure. I've been
analyzing the performance of these heuristics on everything in the
llvm test suite in addition to a few other benchmarks. I would like
each heuristic check to be verified by a unit test, but I'm still
trying to figure out the best way to do that. The heuristics are still
in considerable flux, but as they are refined we should be rigorous
about unit testing the improvements.
llvm-svn: 167527
Allows the new machine model to be used for NumMicroOps and OutputLatency.
Allows the HazardRecognizer to be disabled along with itineraries.
llvm-svn: 165603
The Hexagon target decided to use a lot of functionality from the
target-independent scheduler. That's fine, and other targets should be
able to do the same. This reorg and API update makes that easy.
For the record, ScheduleDAGMI was not meant to be subclassed. Instead,
new scheduling algorithms should be able to implement
MachineSchedStrategy and be done. But if need be, it's nice to be
able to extend ScheduleDAGMI, so I also made that easier. The target
scheduler is somewhat more apt to break that way though.
llvm-svn: 163580
The logic for recomputing latency based on a ScheduleDAG edge was
shady. This bypasses the problem by requiring the client to provide
operand indices. This ensures consistent use of the machine model's
API.
llvm-svn: 162420
subtarget CPU descriptions and support new features of
MachineScheduler.
MachineModel has three categories of data:
1) Basic properties for coarse grained instruction cost model.
2) Scheduler Read/Write resources for simple per-opcode and operand cost model (TBD).
3) Instruction itineraties for detailed per-cycle reservation tables.
These will all live side-by-side. Any subtarget can use any
combination of them. Instruction itineraries will not change in the
near term. In the long run, I expect them to only be relevant for
in-order VLIW machines that have complex contraints and require a
precise scheduling/bundling model. Once itineraries are only actively
used by VLIW-ish targets, they could be replaced by something more
appropriate for those targets.
This tablegen backend rewrite sets things up for introducing
MachineModel type #2: per opcode/operand cost model.
llvm-svn: 159891
Andrew Trick