Summary:
In D41919, I missed that there was a *second* step when uploading
diffs via web where the repository should be specified.
Reviewers: asb, probinson
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41956
llvm-svn: 322375
Summary:
Docs are out of date now that we have separate repositories for LLVM,
Clang, etc.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41919
llvm-svn: 322290
This new page acts as an entry point for (new) contributors to LLVM and
provides information about
* What to contribute
* How to submit a patch
* Where to start to learn more about LLVM's architecture and internals.
This version of the page duplicates some information from the
DeveloperPolicy and Phabricator pages. Subsequent changes should work
towards moving information for new developers to this page, where it
makes sense.
Reviewers: reames, probinson, kristof.beyls, silvas, rengolin, asb
Reviewed By: silvas
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41665
llvm-svn: 321804
Summary: Update the Phabricator docs to clarify how changes are merged for contributors without commit access.
Reviewers: delcypher, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, anmol, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28184
llvm-svn: 290767
Phabricator to trunk.
The previous documentation had a few issues:
* It did not make it explicit that code could be
committed without using the Arcanist tool and how this should be done.
* There was also an implicit assumption on using Subversion
rather than git-svn in the example using Arcanist. The documentation now
explicitly mentions both cases and details how to commit to trunk in
each case.
Reviewers: klimek, probinson
Subscribers: probinson, nwilson, reames, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15801
llvm-svn: 257764
Summary:
I need a test commit for using arc.
This seems like an appropriate commit to use as a test
We may want to port this commit back to 3.7 also
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11527
llvm-svn: 243408
I noticed this convention from the commit logs. It seems like it
would be useful to document it, to encourage other committers to link
back to code reviews in their commits.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2678
llvm-svn: 201160
offer up my email to the spam lords for it. Hopefully this will
eventually be more automatic, but we don't want people to think there is
only one option.
llvm-svn: 166870
Ben Hamilton