Summary:
Made llvmlibc::RestrictSystemLibcHeadersCheck a subclass of protability::RestrictSystemIncludesCheck to re-use common code between the two.
This also adds the ability to white list linux development headers.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mgorny, xazax.hun, MaskRay, cfe-commits, sivachandra
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76395
Summary:
Bugzilla: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27702
I wasn't sure how this type of thing is usually tested. So any advice would be appreciated.
`check-llvm`, `check-clang` and `check-clang-tools` are clean for me.
**C++98**
```
tetsuo@garland-c-16-sgp1-01:~/dev/llvm-project/test$ cat compile_commands.json
[
{
"directory": "/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test",
"command": "/usr/bin/c++ -std=gnu++98 -o CMakeFiles/test.dir/test.cpp.o -c /home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp",
"file": "/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp"
}
]
tetsuo@garland-c-16-sgp1-01:~/dev/llvm-project/test$ ../build/bin/clang-tidy --checks=misc-unconventional-assign-operator test.cpp
3053 warnings generated.
/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp:7:3: warning: operator=() should take 'Foo const&' or 'Foo' [misc-unconventional-assign-operator]
Foo &operator=(Foo &Other) {
^
Suppressed 3052 warnings (3052 in non-user code).
Use -header-filter=.* to display errors from all non-system headers. Use -system-headers to display errors from system headers as well.
```
**C++17**
```
tetsuo@garland-c-16-sgp1-01:~/dev/llvm-project/test$ cat compile_commands.json
[
{
"directory": "/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test",
"command": "/usr/bin/c++ -std=gnu++17 -o CMakeFiles/test.dir/test.cpp.o -c /home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp",
"file": "/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp"
}
]
tetsuo@garland-c-16-sgp1-01:~/dev/llvm-project/test$ ../build/bin/clang-tidy --checks=misc-unconventional-assign-operator test.cpp
5377 warnings generated.
/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp:7:3: warning: operator=() should take 'Foo const&', 'Foo&&' or 'Foo' [misc-unconventional-assign-operator]
Foo &operator=(Foo &Other) {
^
Suppressed 5376 warnings (5376 in non-user code).
Use -header-filter=.* to display errors from all non-system headers. Use -system-headers to display errors from system headers as well.
```
Reviewers: njames93, MaskRay, alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: njames93
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75901
Summary:
Previously, the range for "->" CXXOperatorCallExpr is the range of the
class object (not including the operator!), e.g. "[[vector_ptr]]->size()".
This patch includes the range of the operator, which fixes the issue
where clangd doesn't go to the overloaded operator "->" definition.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76128
Summary:
Cover a new use case when using a 'signed char' as an integer
might lead to issue with non-ASCII characters. Comparing
a 'signed char' with an 'unsigned char' using equality / unequality
operator produces an unexpected result for non-ASCII characters.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, njames93
Reviewed By: njames93
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75749
Summary: This adds a new module to enforce standards specific to the llvm-libc project. This change also adds the first check which restricts user from including system libc headers accidentally which can lead to subtle bugs that would be a challenge to detect.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: juliehockett, arphaman, jfb, abrachet, sivachandra, Eugene.Zelenko, njames93, mgorny, xazax.hun, MaskRay, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #libc-project, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75332
Most clients of SourceManager.h need to do things like turning source
locations into file & line number pairs, but this doesn't require
bringing in FileManager.h and LLVM's FS headers.
The main code change here is to sink SM::createFileID into the cpp file.
I reason that this is not performance critical because it doesn't happen
on the diagnostic path, it happens along the paths of macro expansion
(could be hot) and new includes (less hot).
Saves some includes:
309 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/Basic/FileManager.h
272 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/Basic/FileSystemOptions.h
271 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/VirtualFileSystem.h
267 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
266 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Chrono.h
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75406
Summary:
Created a general check for restrict-system-includes under portability as recommend in the comments under D75332. I also fleshed out the user facing documentation to show examples for common use-cases such as allow-list, block-list, and wild carding.
Removed fuchsia's check as per phosek sugguestion.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, phosek, alexfh, hokein, njames93
Reviewed By: phosek
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, phosek, cfe-commits, MaskRay
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75786
Summary:
Motivated by [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45045 | Tune inspections to a specific C++ standard. ]]
Moves the isLanguageVersionSupported virtual function from `MakeSmartPtrCheck` to the base `ClangTidyCheck` class.
This will disable registering matchers or pp callbacks on unsupported language versions for a check.
Having it as a standalone function is cleaner than manually disabling the check in the register function and should hopefully
encourage check developers to actually restrict the check based on language version.
As an added bonus this could enable automatic detection of what language version a check runs on for the purpose of documentation generation
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, gribozavr2, Eugene.Zelenko, JonasToth, alexfh, hokein
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Subscribers: xazax.hun, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75289
Summary:
Also use //check// in add_new_check.py for terminology consistency.
PS
My GitHub ID is [[ https://github.com/EugeneZelenko | EugeneZelenko ]], if it's necessary for attribution.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman, njames93, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: njames93
Subscribers: Andi, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73580
Added FixItHint comments to ReservedIdentifierCheck and IdentifierNamingCheck to trick the python scripts into detecting a fix it is provided as it can't see the FixItHints in RenamerClangTidyCheck.cpp
readability-redundant-expression now detects expressions where a logical
or bitwise operator had equivalent LHS and RHS where the equivalent
operands were separated by more operands.
Summary:
Recursion is a powerful tool, but like any tool
without care it can be dangerous. For example,
if the recursion is unbounded, you will
eventually run out of stack and crash.
You can of course track the recursion depth
but if it is hardcoded, there can always be some
other environment when that depth is too large,
so said magic number would need to be env-dependent.
But then your program's behavior is suddenly more env-dependent.
Also, recursion, while it does not outright stop optimization,
recursive calls are less great than normal calls,
for example they hinder inlining.
Recursion is banned in some coding guidelines:
* SEI CERT DCL56-CPP. Avoid cycles during initialization of static objects
* JPL 2.4 Do not use direct or indirect recursion.
* I'd say it is frowned upon in LLVM, although not banned
And is plain unsupported in some cases:
* OpenCL 1.2, 6.9 Restrictions: i. Recursion is not supported.
So there's clearly a lot of reasons why one might want to
avoid recursion, and replace it with worklist handling.
It would be great to have a enforcement for it though.
This implements such a check.
Here we detect both direct and indirect recursive calls,
although since clang-tidy (unlike clang static analyzer)
is CTU-unaware, if the recursion transcends a single standalone TU,
we will naturally not find it :/
The algorithm is pretty straight-forward:
1. Build call-graph for the entire TU.
For that, the existing `clang::CallGraph` is re-used,
although it had to be modified to also track the location of the call.
2. Then, the hard problem: how do we detect recursion?
Since we have a graph, let's just do the sane thing,
and look for Strongly Connected Function Declarations - widely known as `SCC`.
For that LLVM provides `llvm::scc_iterator`,
which is internally an Tarjan's DFS algorithm, and is used throught LLVM,
so this should be as performant as possible.
3. Now that we've got SCC's, we discard those that don't contain loops.
Note that there may be more than one loop in SCC!
4. For each loopy SCC, we call out each function, and print a single example
call graph that shows recursion -- it didn't seem worthwhile enumerating
every possible loop in SCC, although i suppose it could be implemented.
* To come up with that call graph cycle example, we start at first SCC node,
see which callee of the node is within SCC (and is thus known to be in cycle),
and recurse into it until we hit the callee that is already in call stack.
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, ffrankies, Eugene.Zelenko, erichkeane, NoQ
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Charusso, Naghasan, bader, riccibruno, mgorny, Anastasia, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72362
Summary: Addresses [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44816 | bugprone-infinite-loop false positive with CATCH2 ]] by disabling the check on loops where the condition is known to always eval as false, in other words not a loop.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, gribozavr2, JonasToth
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74374
Summary: Such implementations may override the class's own implementation, and even be a danger in case someone later comes and adds one to the class itself. Most times this has been encountered have been a mistake.
Reviewers: stephanemoore, benhamilton, dmaclach
Reviewed By: stephanemoore, benhamilton, dmaclach
Subscribers: dmaclach, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72876
whether a call is to a builtin.
We already had a general mechanism to do this but for some reason
weren't using it. In passing, check for the other unary operators that
can intervene in a reasonably-direct function call (we already handled
'&' but missed '*' and '+').
This reverts commit aaae6b1b61,
reinstating af80b8ccc5, with a fix to
clang-tidy.
Nathan James