This reverts commit 0d48d265db.
This reapplies the following commit, with a fix for CAPI/ir.c:
[mlir] Start splitting the `tensor` dialect out of `std`.
This starts by moving `std.extract_element` to `tensor.extract` (this
mirrors the naming of `vector.extract`).
Curiously, `std.extract_element` supposedly works on vectors as well,
and this patch removes that functionality. I would tend to do that in
separate patch, but I couldn't find any downstream users relying on
this, and the fact that we have `vector.extract` made it seem safe
enough to lump in here.
This also sets up the `tensor` dialect as a dependency of the `std`
dialect, as some ops that currently live in `std` depend on
`tensor.extract` via their canonicalization patterns.
Part of RFC: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-split-the-tensor-dialect-from-std/2347/2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92991
This starts by moving `std.extract_element` to `tensor.extract` (this
mirrors the naming of `vector.extract`).
Curiously, `std.extract_element` supposedly works on vectors as well,
and this patch removes that functionality. I would tend to do that in
separate patch, but I couldn't find any downstream users relying on
this, and the fact that we have `vector.extract` made it seem safe
enough to lump in here.
This also sets up the `tensor` dialect as a dependency of the `std`
dialect, as some ops that currently live in `std` depend on
`tensor.extract` via their canonicalization patterns.
Part of RFC: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-split-the-tensor-dialect-from-std/2347/2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92991
Introduce affine.prefetch: op to prefetch using a multi-dimensional
subscript on a memref; similar to affine.load but has no effect on
semantics, but only on performance.
Provide lowering through std.prefetch, llvm.prefetch and map to llvm's
prefetch instrinsic. All attributes reflected through the lowering -
locality hint, rw, and instr/data cache.
affine.prefetch %0[%i, %j + 5], false, 3, true : memref<400x400xi32>
Signed-off-by: Uday Bondhugula <uday@polymagelabs.com>
Closestensorflow/mlir#225
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/pull/225 from bondhugula:prefetch 4c3b4e93bc64d9a5719504e6d6e1657818a2ead0
PiperOrigin-RevId: 286212997
- for the symbol rules, the code was updated but the doc wasn't.
Signed-off-by: Uday Bondhugula <uday@polymagelabs.com>
Closestensorflow/mlir#284
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/pull/284 from bondhugula:doc 9aad8b8a715559f7ce61265f3da3f8a3c11b45ea
PiperOrigin-RevId: 284283712
- introduce splat op in standard dialect (currently for int/float/index input
type, output type can be vector or statically shaped tensor)
- implement LLVM lowering (when result type is 1-d vector)
- add constant folding hook for it
- while on Ops.cpp, fix some stale names
Signed-off-by: Uday Bondhugula <uday@polymagelabs.com>
Closestensorflow/mlir#141
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/pull/141 from bondhugula:splat 48976a6aa0a75be6d91187db6418de989e03eb51
PiperOrigin-RevId: 270965304
- some of it has been adapted from LLVM's vim utils
Signed-off-by: Uday Bondhugula <uday@polymagelabs.com>
Closestensorflow/mlir#90
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/pull/90 from bondhugula:vim 22b1c958818c4b09de0ec8e1d7a4893171a03dbf
PiperOrigin-RevId: 266071752
consistent and moving the using declarations over. Hopefully this is the last
truly massive patch in this refactoring.
This is step 21/n towards merging instructions and statements, NFC.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 227178245
1) affineint (as it is named) is not a type suitable for general computation (e.g. the multiply/adds in an integer matmul). It has undefined width and is undefined on overflow. They are used as the indices for forstmt because they are intended to be used as indexes inside the loop.
2) It can be used in both cfg and ml functions, and in cfg functions. As you mention, “symbols” are not affine, and we use affineint values for symbols.
3) Integers aren’t affine, the algorithms applied to them can be. :)
4) The only suitable use for affineint in MLIR is for indexes and dimension sizes (i.e. the bounds of those indexes).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 216057974
Sean Silva