Check for end() before skipping through debug values. This avoids
dereferencing end() when the instruction is the final one in the basic
block. (It still assumes that a debug value will not be the final
instruction in the basic block. No tests seemed to violate that.)
Many Hexagon tests trigger this, but they happen to magically pass right
now. I found this because WIP patches for PR26753 convert them into
crashes.
llvm-svn: 278355
After machine block placement, MBBs may not have terminators, and it is
appropriate to check for the end iterator here. We can fold the check
into the next if, as well. This look is really just looking for BBs that
end in CATCHRET.
llvm-svn: 278350
ExecutionEngine::runFunction is supposed to allow execution of arbitrary
function types, but MCJIT can only reasonably support a limited subset of
main-linke function types. This patch documents this limitation, and fixes
MCJIT::runFunction to abort with a meaningful error at runtime if called with
an unsupported function type.
llvm-svn: 278348
End iterators are usually sentinels, not actually Instruction* at all.
Stop casting to it just to get an iterator back.
There is likely no observable functionality change here right now
(although this is relying on UB, I doubt it was triggering anything),
but I'll be removing the cast soon.
llvm-svn: 278346
Check for an end iterator from MachineBasicBlock::getFirstTerminator in
llvm::getFuncletMembership. If this is turned into an assertion, it
fires in 48 X86 testcases (for example,
CodeGen/X86/regalloc-spill-at-ehpad.ll).
Since this is likely a latent bug (shouldn't all basic blocks end with a
terminator?) I've filed PR28938.
llvm-svn: 278344
This restores commit r278330, with fixes for a few bot failures:
- Fix a late change I had made to the save temps output file that I
missed due to existing files sitting on my disk
- Fix a bunch of Windows bot failures with "ambiguous call to overloaded
function" due to confusion between llvm::make_unique vs
std::make_unique (preface the new make_unique calls with "llvm::")
- Attempt to fix a modules bot failure by adding a missing include
to LTO/Config.h.
Original change:
Resolution-based LTO API.
Summary:
This introduces a resolution-based LTO API. The main advantage of this API over
existing APIs is that it allows the linker to supply a resolution for each
symbol in each object, rather than the combined object as a whole. This will
become increasingly important for use cases such as ThinLTO which require us
to process symbol resolutions in a more complicated way than just adjusting
linkage.
Patch by Peter Collingbourne.
Reviewers: rafael, tejohnson, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: lhames, tejohnson, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20268
llvm-svn: 278338
When legal, extending trip count in the loop control logic generates better code compared to truncating IV. This is because
(1) extending trip count is a loop invariant operation (see genLoopLimit where we prove trip count is loop invariant).
(2) Scalar Evolution seems to have problems understanding trunc when computing loop trip count. So removing them allows better analysis performed in Scalar Evolution. (In particular this fixes PR 28363 which is the motivation for this change).
I am not going to perform any performance test. Any degradation caused by this should be an indication of a bug elsewhere.
To prove legality, we rely on SCEV to prove zext(trunc(IV)) == IV (or similarly for sext). If this holds, we can prove equivalence of trunc(IV)==ExitCnt (1) and IV == zext(ExitCnt). Simply take zext of boths sides of (1) and apply the proven equivalence.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23075
llvm-svn: 278334
This reverts commit r278330.
I made a change to the save temps output that is causing issues with the
bots. Didn't realize this because I had older output files sitting on
disk in my test output directory.
llvm-svn: 278331
Summary:
This introduces a resolution-based LTO API. The main advantage of this API over
existing APIs is that it allows the linker to supply a resolution for each
symbol in each object, rather than the combined object as a whole. This will
become increasingly important for use cases such as ThinLTO which require us
to process symbol resolutions in a more complicated way than just adjusting
linkage.
Patch by Peter Collingbourne.
Reviewers: rafael, tejohnson, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: lhames, tejohnson, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20268
Address review comments
llvm-svn: 278330
The previous implementation (not custom) doesn't enforce zeroing off upper bits. The assumption is that i1 PRODUCER (truncate and extractelement) must zero all upper bits, so i1 CONSUMER instructions ( test, zext, save, etc) can be done without additional zeroing.
Make extractelement i1 lowering custom for all vector i1.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23246
llvm-svn: 278328
This patch helps avoid false dependencies on undef registers by updating the machine instructions' undef operand to use a register that the instruction is truly dependent on, or use a register with clearance higher than Pref.
Pseudo example:
loop:
xmm0 = ...
xmm1 = vcvtsi2sdl eax, xmm0<undef>
... = inst xmm0
jmp loop
In this example, selecting xmm0 as the undef register creates false dependency between loop iterations.
This false dependency cannot be solved by inserting an xor before vcvtsi2sdl because xmm0 is alive at the point of the vcvtsi2sdl instruction.
Selecting a different register instead of xmm0, especially a register that is not used in the loop, will eliminate this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22466
llvm-svn: 278321
Change --no-pgo-warn-missing to -pgo-warn-missing-function
and negate the default. /NFC
Add more test to make sure the warning is off by default
llvm-svn: 278314
The YAML representation was always outputting the root node of an export trie even if the trie was empty. While this doesn't really have any functional impact, it does add visual clutter to the yaml file.
llvm-svn: 278307
It's more than just inttoptr, but the others can't be tested until we have
support for non-trivial constants (they currently get unavoidably folded to a
ConstantInt).
llvm-svn: 278303
Summary:
This patch define and implement amdgcn image intrinsics with sampler.
1. define vdata type to be llvm_anyfloat_ty, address type to be llvm_anyfloat_ty,
and rsrc type to be llvm_anyint_ty. As a result, we expect the intrinsics name
to have three suffixes to overload each of these three types;
2. D128 as well as two other flags are implied in the three types, for example,
if you use v8i32 as resource type, then r128 is 0!
3. don't expose TFE flag, and other flags are exposed in the instruction order:
unrm, glc, slc, lwe and da.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22838
Reviewed by:
arsenm and tstellarAMD
llvm-svn: 278291
Summary:
I think it is much better this way.
When I firstly saw line:
Cost += InlineConstants::LastCallToStaticBonus;
I though that this is a bug, because everywhere where the cost is being reduced
it is usuing -=.
Reviewers: eraman, tejohnson, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23222
llvm-svn: 278290
If AnalyzeBranch can't analyze a block and it is possible to
fallthrough, then duplicating the block doesn't make sense, as only one
block can be the layout predecessor for the un-analyzable fallthrough.
Submitted wit a test case, but NOTE: the test case doesn't currently
fail. However, the test case fails with D20505 and would have saved me
some time debugging.
llvm-svn: 278288
Insert before the skip branch if one is created.
This is a somewhat more natural placement relative
to the skip branches, and makes it possible to implement
analyzeBranch for skip blocks.
The test changes are mostly due to a quirk where
the block label is not emitted if there is a terminator
that is not also a branch.
llvm-svn: 278273
Summary:
See the new test case for one that was (non-deterministically) crashing
on trunk and deterministically hit the assertion that I added in D23302.
Basically, the machine function contains a sequence
DS_WRITE_B32 %vreg4, %vreg14:sub0, ...
DS_WRITE_B32 %vreg4, %vreg14:sub0, ...
%vreg14:sub1<def> = COPY %vreg14:sub0
and SILoadStoreOptimizer::mergeWrite2Pair merges the two DS_WRITE_B32
instructions into one before calling repairIntervalsInRange.
Now repairIntervalsInRange wants to repair %vreg14, in particular, and
ends up trying to repair %vreg14:sub1 as well, but that only becomes
active _after_ the range that is to be repaired, hence the crash due
to LR.find(...) == LR.begin() at the start of repairOldRegInRange.
I believe that just skipping those subrange is fine, but again, not too
familiar with that code.
Reviewers: MatzeB, kparzysz, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: llvm-commits, MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23303
llvm-svn: 278268
Matt Arsenault