IVUsers currently makes sure that all loops dominating a user are
in loop simplify form, because SCEVExpander needs a preheader to
insert into. However, loop simplify form requires much more than
that. In particular, it requires dedicated exits, which means that
exits need to be found and walked. For large functions with many
nested loops, this can result in pathological compile-time explosion.
Fix this by only checking the property we're actually interested in,
which is incidentally cheap to check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111493
The CFG being changed and the overall call graph are not related, we can introduce/remove calls without changing the CFG.
Resolves one of the issues in PR51946.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111275
As a brief reminder, an "exit count" is the number of times the backedge executes before some event. It can be zero if we exit before the backedge is reached. A "trip count" is the number of times the loop header is entered if we branch into the loop. In general, TC = BTC + 1 and thus a zero trip count is ill defined
There is a cornercases which we don't handle well. Let's assume i8 for our examples to keep things simple. If BTC = 255, then the correct trip count is 256. However, 256 is not representable in i8.
In theory, code which needs to reason about trip counts is responsible for checking for this cornercase, and either bailing out, or handling it correctly. Historically, we don't have a great track record about actually doing so.
When reviewing D109676, I found myself asking a basic question. Was there any good reason to preserve the current wrap-to-zero behavior when converting from backedge taken counts to trip counts? After reviewing existing code, I could not find a single case which appears to correctly and precisely handle the overflow case.
This patch changes the default behavior to extend instead of wrap. That is, if the result might be 256, we return a value of i9 type to ensure we interpret the count correctly. I did leave the legacy behavior as an option since a) loop-flatten stops triggering if I extend due to weirdly specific pattern matching I didn't understand and b) we could reasonably use the mode if we'd externally established a lack of overflow.
I want to emphasize that this change is *not* NFC. There are two call sites (one in ScalarEvolution.cpp, one in LoopCacheAnalysis.cpp) which are switched to the extend semantics. The former appears imprecise (but correct) for a constant 255 BTC. The later appears incorrect, though I don't have a test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110587
This patch adds further support for vectorisation of loops that involve
selecting an integer value based on a previous comparison. Consider the
following C++ loop:
int r = a;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
if (src[i] > 3) {
r = b;
}
src[i] += 2;
}
We should be able to vectorise this loop because all we are doing is
selecting between two states - 'a' and 'b' - both of which are loop
invariant. This just involves building a vector of values that contain
either 'a' or 'b', where the final reduced value will be 'b' if any lane
contains 'b'.
The IR generated by clang typically looks like this:
%phi = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %phi.update, %for.body ]
...
%pred = icmp ugt i32 %val, i32 3
%phi.update = select i1 %pred, i32 %b, i32 %phi
We already detect min/max patterns, which also involve a select + cmp.
However, with the min/max patterns we are selecting loaded values (and
hence loop variant) in the loop. In addition we only support certain
cmp predicates. This patch adds a new pattern matching function
(isSelectCmpPattern) and new RecurKind enums - SelectICmp & SelectFCmp.
We only support selecting values that are integer and loop invariant,
however we can support any kind of compare - integer or float.
Tests have been added here:
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-select-cmp.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/select-cmp-predicated.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/select-cmp.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108136
llvm.is.constant* intrinsics are evaluated to 0 or 1 integral values.
A common use case for llvm.is.constant comes from the higher level
__builtin_constant_p. A common usage pattern of __builtin_constant_p in
the Linux kernel is:
void foo (int bar) {
if (__builtin_constant_p(bar)) {
// lots of code that will fold away to a constant.
} else {
// a little bit of code, usually a libcall.
}
}
A minor issue in InlineCost calculations is when `bar` is _not_ Constant
and still will not be after inlining, we don't discount the true branch
and the inline cost of `foo` ends up being the cost of both branches
together, rather than just the false branch.
This leads to code like the above where inlining will not help prove bar
Constant, but it still would be beneficial to inline foo, because the
"true" branch is irrelevant from a cost perspective.
For example, IPSCCP can sink a passed constant argument to foo:
const int x = 42;
void bar (void) { foo(x); }
This improves our inlining decisions, and fixes a few head scratching
cases were the disassembly shows a relatively small `foo` not inlined
into a lone caller.
We could further improve this modeling by tracking whether the argument
to llvm.is.constant* is a parameter of the function, and if inlining
would allow that parameter to become Constant. This idea is noted in a
FIXME comment.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1302
Reviewed By: kazu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111272
We only need to invalidate if the instruction being removed is the cached "first special instruction". If the instruction is before that one, it can't (by assumption) be special. If it is after that one, it wasn't the first.
This factors out utilities for scanning a bounded block of instructions since we have this code repeated in a bunch of places. The change to InlineFunction isn't strictly NFC as the limit mechanism there didn't handle debug instructions correctly.
DecompGEP.Base and UnderlyingV are currently always the same.
However, logically DecompGEP.Base is the right value to use here,
because the decomposed offset is relative to that base.
To better reflect the meaning of the now-disambiguated {GlobalValue,
GlobalAlias}::getBaseObject after breaking off GlobalIFunc::getResolverFunction
(D109792), the function is renamed to getAliaseeObject.
When checking to see if we can apply IR flags to a SCEV, we need to identify a bound on the defining scope of the SCEV to be produced. We'd previously added support for a couple SCEVExpr types which trivially imply bounds, but hadn't handled types such as umax where the bounds come from the bounds of the operands. This does the obvious thing, and recurses through operands searching for a tighter bound on the defining scope.
I'm honestly surprised by how little this seems to mater on existing tests, but it's worth doing for completeness sake alone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111191
When determining the defining scope, avoid repeatedly querying
dominationg against the function entry instruction. This ends up
begin a very common case that we can handle more efficiently.
This does for readability of returns within said function as what we do for the caller side when reasoning about what might be poison.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111180
This patch removes a compile time restriction from isSCEVExprNeverPoison. We've strengthened our ability to reason about flags on scopes other than addrecs, and this bailout prevents us from using it. The comment is also suspect as well in that we're in the middle of constructing a SCEV for I. As such, we're going to visit all operands *anyways*.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111186
Currently the fadd optimizations in InstSimplify don't know how to do this
"X + -0.0 ==> X" fold when using the constrained intrinsics. This adds the
support.
This commit is derived from D106362 with some improvements from D107285.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111085
BasicAA GEP decomposition currently performs all calculation on the
maximum pointer size, but at least 64-bit, with an option to double
the size. The code comment claims that this improves analysis power
when working with uint64_t indices on 32-bit systems. However, I don't
see how this can be, at least while maintaining correctness:
When working on canonical code, the GEP indices will have GEP index
size. If the original code worked on uint64_t with a 32-bit size_t,
then there will be truncs inserted before use as a GEP index. Linear
expression decomposition does not look through truncs, so this will
be an opaque value as far as GEP decomposition is concerned. Working
on a wider pointer size does not help here (or have any effect at all).
When working on non-canonical code (before first InstCombine), the
GEP indices are implicitly truncated to GEP index size. The BasicAA
code currently just ignores this fact completely, and pretends that
this truncation doesn't happen. This is incorrect and will be
addressed by D110977.
I believe that for correctness reasons, it is important to work on
the actual GEP index size to properly model potential overflow.
BasicAA tries to patch over the fact that it uses the wrong size
(see adjustToPointerSize), but it only does that in limited cases
(only for constant values, and not all of them either). I'd like to
move this code towards always working on the correct size, and
dropping these artificial pointer size adjustments is the first step
towards that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110657
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/QagQMn
This fold is handled by instcombine via SimplifyUsingDistributiveLaws(),
but we are missing the sibliing fold for 'logical and' (implemented with
'select'). Retrofitting the code in instcombine looks much harder
than just adding a small adjustment here, and this is potentially more
efficient and beneficial to other passes.
This also removes the need to disable the mandatory inlining phase in
tests.
In a departure from the previous remark, we don't output a 'cost' in
this case, because there's no such thing. We just report that inlining
happened because of the attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110891
Behavior wise, this patch should be mostly NFC. The only behavior difference known is that on the isSCEVExprNeverPoison path we'll consider a bound imposed by the SCEVable operands (if any).
Algorithmically, it's an invert of the existing code. Previously, we checked for each operand if we could find a bound, then checked for must-execute given that bound. With the patch, we use dominance to refine the innermost bound, then check must execute once. The interesting case is when we have multiple unknowns within a single basic block. While both dominance and must-execute are worst-case linear walks within the block, only dominance is cached. As such, refining based on dominance should be more efficient.
This refactors load folding to happen in two cleanly separated
steps: ConstantFoldLoadFromConstPtr() takes a pointer to load from
and decomposes it into a constant initializer base and an offset.
Then ConstantFoldLoadFromConst() loads from that initializer at
the given offset. This makes the core logic independent of having
actual GEP expressions (and those GEP expressions having certain
structure) and will allow exposing ConstantFoldLoadFromConst() as
an independent API in the future.
This is mostly only a refactoring, but it does make the folding
logic slightly more powerful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111023
When determining NoAlias based on object size and dereferenceability
information, we can ignore frees for the same reason we can ignore
possible null pointers (if null is not a valid pointer): Actually
accessing the null pointer / freed pointer would be immediate UB,
and AA results are only valid under the assumption of an access.
This addresses a minor regression from D110745.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111028
In TargetLibraryInfoImpl::isValidProtoForLibFunc we no longer
need the IsSizeTTy lambda function and the SizeTTy object. Instead
we just follow the regular structure of checking for integer types
given an exepected number of bits.
Stop using APInt constructors and methods that were soft-deprecated in
D109483. This fixes all the uses I found in llvm, except for the APInt
unit tests which should still test the deprecated methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110807
This addresses a comment from review on D109845. The concern was raised that an unbounded scan would be expensive. Long term plan is to cache this search - likely reusing the existing mechanism for loop side effects - but let's be simple and conservative for now.
This addresses a comment from review on D109845. Even for SCEVs which we can't find true bounds without recursing through operands, entry to the function forms a trivial upper bound. In some cases, this trivial bound is enough to prove safety of flag inference.
This is a followon to D109845. With that landed, we will have fixed all known instances of pr51817, and can thus start inferring flags more aggressively with greatly reduced risk of miscompiles. This patch simply applies the same inference logic used in that patch to our other major flag inference path.
We can still do much better here (on both paths), but this is our first step.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111003
This fixes a violation of the wrap flag rules introduced in c4048d8f. This is an alternate fix to D106852.
The basic problem being fixed is that we infer a set of flags which is valid at some inner scope S1 (usually by correctly propagating them from IR), and then (incorrectly) extend them to a SCEV in scope S2 where S1 != S2. This is not in general safe per the wrap flags semantics recently defined.
In this patch, I include a simple inference step to handle the case where we can prove that S2 is the preheader of the loop S1, and that entry into S2 implies execution of S1. See the code for a more detailed explanation.
One worry I have with this patch is that I might be over-fitting what shows up in tests - and thus hiding negative impact we'd see in the real world. My best defense is that the rule used here very closely follows the one used to propagate the flags from IR to the inner add to start with, and thus if one is reasonable, so probably is the other. Curious what others think about that piece.
The test diffs are roughly as expected. Mostly analysis only, with two transform changes. Oddly, the result looks better in the loop-idiom test, and I don't understand the PPC output enough to have tell. Nothing terrible looking though. (For context, without the scope inference peephole, the test delta includes a couple of vectorization tests. Again, not super concerning, but slightly more so.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109845
This fixes a violation of the wrap flag rules introduced in c4048d8f. This was also noted in the (very old) PR23527.
The issue being fixed is that we assume the inbound flag on any GEP assumes that all users of *any* gep (or add) which happens to map to that SCEV would also be UB if the (other) gep overflowed. That's simply not true.
In terms of the test diffs, I don't see anything seriously problematic. The lost flags are expected (given the semantic restriction on when its legal to tag the SCEV), and there are several cases where the previously inferred flags are unsound per the new semantics.
The only common trend I noticed when looking at the deltas is that by not considering branch on poison as immediate UB in ValueTracking, we do miss a few cases we could reclaim. We may be able to claw some of these back with the follow ideas mentioned in PR51817.
It's worth noting that most of the changes are analysis result only changes. The two transform changes are pretty minimal. In one case, we miss the opportunity to infer a nuw (correctly). In the other, we fail to fold an exit and produce a loop invariant form instead. This one is probably over-reduced as the program appears to be undefined in practice, and neither before or after exploits that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109789
This code is attempting to prove that I must execute if we enter the defining scope of the SCEV which will be created from I. In the case where it found a defining addrec scope, it had a rather odd restriction that all of the other operands must be loop invariant in that addrec's loop.
As near as I can tell here, we really only need a upper bound on the defining scope. If we can prove the stronger property, then we must also have proven the property on the exact defining scope as well.
In practice, the actual effect of this change is narrow. The compile time restriction at the top of the routine basically limits us to I being an arithmetic in some loop L with both an addrec operand in L, and a unknown operands in L. Possible to demonstrate, but the main value of the change is removing unneeded code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110892
This patch adds further support for vectorisation of loops that involve
selecting an integer value based on a previous comparison. Consider the
following C++ loop:
int r = a;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
if (src[i] > 3) {
r = b;
}
src[i] += 2;
}
We should be able to vectorise this loop because all we are doing is
selecting between two states - 'a' and 'b' - both of which are loop
invariant. This just involves building a vector of values that contain
either 'a' or 'b', where the final reduced value will be 'b' if any lane
contains 'b'.
The IR generated by clang typically looks like this:
%phi = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %phi.update, %for.body ]
...
%pred = icmp ugt i32 %val, i32 3
%phi.update = select i1 %pred, i32 %b, i32 %phi
We already detect min/max patterns, which also involve a select + cmp.
However, with the min/max patterns we are selecting loaded values (and
hence loop variant) in the loop. In addition we only support certain
cmp predicates. This patch adds a new pattern matching function
(isSelectCmpPattern) and new RecurKind enums - SelectICmp & SelectFCmp.
We only support selecting values that are integer and loop invariant,
however we can support any kind of compare - integer or float.
Tests have been added here:
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-select-cmp.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/select-cmp-predicated.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/select-cmp.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108136
Add methods to appropriately extend KnownBits/ConstantRange there,
same as with APInt. Also clean up the known bits handling by
actually doing that extension rather than checking ZExtBits. This
doesn't matter now, but becomes relevant once truncation is
involved.
The information can be implicit (from `ValueTracking`) or explicit.
This implements the backend part of the following RFC
https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/T9o51zB1JY.
We still need to settle on how to best represent the information in the
IR, but this is a separate discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109746
Rather than separately handling subtraction of offset and variable
indices, make this one operation. Also rewrite the implementation
to use range-based for loops.
There are two sets of new/delete functions, one with Windows/MSVC
mangling and one with Itanium mangling. Mark one set or the other
as unavailable depending on the target.
Split the test malloc-free-delete.ll into three parts: malloc-free.dll
for the C API tests, new-delete-itanium.ll and new-delete-msvc.ll for
the target-specific new/delete tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110419
I was looking at some missed optimizations in CHERI-enabled targets and
noticed that we weren't removing vtable indirection for calls via known
pointers-to-members. The underlying reason for this is that we represent
pointers-to-function-members as {i8 addrspace(200)*, i64} and generate the
constant offsets using (gep i8 null, <index>). We use a constant GEP here
since inttoptr should be avoided for CHERI capabilities. The pointer-to-member
call uses ptrtoint to extract the index, and due to this missing fold we can't
infer the actual value loaded from the vtable.
This is the initial constant folding change for this pattern, I will add
an InstCombine fold as a follow-up.
We could fold all inbounds GEP to null (and therefore the ptrtoint to
zero) since zero is the only valid offset for an inbounds GEP. If the
offset is not zero, that GEP is poison and therefore returning 0 is valid
(https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Gzb5iH). However, Clang currently generates
inbounds GEPs on NULL for hand-written offsetof() expressions, so this
could lead to miscompilations.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110245
When using a datalayout that has pointer index width != pointer size this
code triggers an assertion in Value::stripAndAccumulateConstantOffsets().
I encountered this this while compiling FreeBSD for CHERI-RISC-V.
Also update LoadsTest.cpp to use a DataLayout with index width != pointer
width to ensure this case is tested.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110406
When TargetLibraryInfoImpl::isValidProtoForLibFunc is checking
function signatures to detect lib calls it may check that a parameter
or return value matches with the "size_t" type. For this to work it
has to derive the IR type matching with "size_t". Depending on if
a DataLayout is provided or not, this has been done in two different
way. Either a more strict check being based on IntPtrType (which is
given by the DataLayout) or a more relaxed check assuming that any
integer type matches with "size_t".
Given that the stricter approach exist it seems like we do not want
to trigger rewrites etc if we aren't sure that a function calls
actually match with the library function. Therefore it was questioned
why we actually have the more relaxed approach when not being able
to derive an IR type for "size_t". This patch will take a more
defensive approach, requiring that a DataLayout is passed to
isValidProtoForLibFunc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110584
This reverts commit 8fdac7cb7a.
The issue causing the revert has been fixed a while ago in 60b852092c.
Original message:
Now that SCEVExpander can preserve LCSSA form,
we do not have to worry about LCSSA form when
trying to look through PHIs. SCEVExpander will take
care of inserting LCSSA PHI nodes as required.
This increases precision of the analysis in some cases.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev, bmahjour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71539
Thinlink provides an opportunity to propagate function attributes across modules, enabling additional propagation opportunities.
This change propagates (currently default off, turn on with `disable-thinlto-funcattrs=1`) noRecurse and noUnwind based off of function summaries of the prevailing functions in bottom-up call-graph order. Testing on clang self-build:
1. There's a 35-40% increase in noUnwind functions due to the additional propagation opportunities.
2. Throughput is measured at 10-15% increase in thinlink time which itself is 1.5% of E2E link time.
Implementation-wise this adds the following summary function attributes:
1. noUnwind: function is noUnwind
2. mayThrow: function contains a non-call instruction that `Instruction::mayThrow` returns true on (e.g. windows SEH instructions)
3. hasUnknownCall: function contains calls that don't make it into the summary call-graph thus should not be propagated from (e.g. indirect for now, could add no-opt functions as well)
Testing:
Clang self-build passes and 2nd stage build passes check-all
ninja check-all with newly added tests passing
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36850
This is a followup to D109844 (and alternative to D109907), which
integrates the new "earliest escape" tracking into AliasAnalysis.
This is done by replacing the pre-existing context-free capture
cache in AAQueryInfo with a replaceable (virtual) object with two
implementations: The SimpleCaptureInfo implements the previous
behavior (check whether object is captured at all), while
EarliestEscapeInfo implements the new behavior from DSE.
This combines the "earliest escape" analysis with the full power of
BasicAA: It subsumes the call handling from D109907, considers a
wider range of escape sources, and works with AA recursion. The
compile-time cost is slightly higher than with D109907.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110368
The case of an Argument and an identified function local is already
handled earlier, because we don't care about captures in that case.
As such, we don't need to additionally consider the combination of
an Argument with a non-escaping identified function local.
This ensures that isEscapeSource() only returns true for
instructions, which is necessary for D110368.
Other <math>_finite calls are marked as unavailable except on GNU/Linux;
it looks like the sqrt set was just overlooked.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110418
This reverts the revert commit df56fc6ebb.
This version of the patch adjusts the location where the EarliestEscapes
cache is cleared when an instruction gets removed. The earliest escaping
instruction does not have to be a memory instruction.
It could be a ptrtoint instruction like in the added test
@earliest_escape_ptrtoint, which subsequently gets removed. We need to
invalidate the EarliestEscape entry referring to the ptrtoint when
deleting it.
This fixes the crash mentioned in
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1252762#c6
There are several places in the code that are currently broken where
we assume an Instruction is always a member of a BasicBlock that
lives in a Function. This is a problem specifically when
attempting to get the vscale_range attribute. This patch adds checks
that an Instruction's parent also has a parent!
I've added a test for a function-less @llvm.vscale intrinsic call here:
unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp
There are several places in the code that are currently broken as
they assume an Instruction always has a parent Function when
attempting to get the vscale_range attribute. This patch adds checks
that an Instruction has a parent.
I've added a test for a parentless @llvm.vscale intrinsic call here:
unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110158
At the moment, DSE only considers whether a pointer may be captured at
all in a function. This leads to cases where we fail to remove stores to
local objects because we do not check if they escape before potential
read-clobbers or after.
Doing context-sensitive escape queries in isReadClobber has been removed
a while ago in d1a1cce5b1 to save compile-time. See PR50220 for more
context.
This patch introduces a new capture tracker, which keeps track of the
'earliest' capture. An instruction A is considered earlier than instruction
B, if A dominates B. If 2 escapes do not dominate each other, the
terminator of the common dominator is chosen. If not all uses cannot be
analyzed, the earliest escape is set to the first instruction in the
function entry block.
If the query instruction dominates the earliest escape and is not in a
cycle, then pointer does not escape before the query instruction.
This patch uses this information when checking if a load of a loaded
underlying object may alias a write to a stack object. If the stack
object does not escape before the load, they do not alias.
I will share a follow-up patch to also use the information for call
instructions to fix PR50220.
In terms of compile-time, the impact is low in general,
NewPM-O3: +0.05%
NewPM-ReleaseThinLTO: +0.05%
NewPM-ReleaseLTO-g: +0.03
with the largest change being tramp3d-v4 (+0.30%)
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=1a3b3301d7aa9ab25a8bdf045c77298b087e3930&to=bc6c6899cae757c3480f4ad4874a76fc1eafb0be&stat=instructions
Compared to always computing the capture information on demand, we get
the following benefits from the caching:
NewPM-O3: -0.03%
NewPM-ReleaseThinLTO: -0.08%
NewPM-ReleaseLTO-g: -0.04%
The biggest speedup is tramp3d-v4 (-0.21%).
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=0b0c99177d1511469c633282ef67f20c851f58b1&to=bc6c6899cae757c3480f4ad4874a76fc1eafb0be&stat=instructions
Overall there is a small, but noticeable benefit from caching. I am not
entirely sure if the speedups warrant the extra complexity of caching.
The way the caching works also means that we might miss a few cases, as
it is less precise. Also, there may be a better way to cache things.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109844
The return type of strlen is size_t, not just any integer.
This is a partial fix for an example based on:
https://llvm.org/PR50836
There's another bug here because we can still crash
processing a real strlen or something that looks like it.
This comment references behavior that was removed in
ccae43a247, which is a commit from 5 years
ago. It seems safe to assume that that behavior won't be coming back
soon. If it does, we can readd this part of the comment :)
isValidAssumeForContext can provide better results with access to the
dominator tree in some cases. This patch adjusts computeConstantRange to
allow passing through a dominator tree.
The use VectorCombine is updated to pass through the DT to enable
additional scalarization.
Note that similar APIs like computeKnownBits already accept optional dominator
tree arguments.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110175
The logic in howManyLessThans is fishy. It first checks invariance of
RHS, and then uses OrigRHS as argument for isLoopEntryGuardedByCond, which
is, strictly saying, a different thing. We are seeing a very rare intermittent
failure of availability checks, and it looks like this precondition is
sometimes broken. Before we can figure out what's going on, adding asserts
that all involved values that may possibly to to isLoopEntryGuardedByCond
are available at loop entry.
If either of these asserts fails (OrigRHS is the most likely suspect), it
means that the logic here is flawed.
The implication logic for two values that are both negative or non-negative
says that it doesn't matter whether their predicate is signed and unsigned,
but only flips unsigned into signed for further inference. This patch adds
support for flipping a signed predicate into unsigned as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109959
Reviewed By: nikic
We implement logic to convert a byte offset into a sequence of GEP
indices for that offset in a number of places. This patch adds a
DataLayout::getGEPIndicesForOffset() method, which implements the
core logic. I've updated SROA, ConstantFolding and InstCombine to
use it, and there's a few more places where it looks relevant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110043
In ValueTracking.cpp we use a function called
computeKnownBitsFromOperator to determine the known bits of a value.
For the vscale intrinsic if the function contains the vscale_range
attribute we can use the maximum and minimum values of vscale to
determine some known zero and one bits. This should help to improve
code quality by allowing certain optimisations to take place.
Tests added here:
Transforms/InstCombine/icmp-vscale.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109883
isPotentiallyReachable can use LoopInfo to return earlier. This patch
allows passing an optional LI to PointerMayBeCapturedBefore. Used in
D109844.
Reviewed By: nikic, asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109978
There is a piece of logic that uses the fact that signed and unsigned
versions of the same predicate are equivalent when both values are
non-negative. It's also true when both of them are negative.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109957
Reviewed By: nikic
Nobody has complained about this, and the documentation for
LLVMContext::yield() states that LLVM is allowed to never call it.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110008
A couple tweaks to
1. allow more thinlto importing by excluding probe intrinsics from IR size in module summary
2. Allow general default attributes (nofree nosync nounwind) for pseudo probe intrinsic. Without those attributes, pseudo probes will be basically treated as unknown calls which will in turn block their containing functions from annotated with those attributes.
Reviewed By: wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109976
getMetadata() currently uses a weird API where it populates a
structure passed to it, and optionally merges into it. Instead,
we can return the AAMDNodes and provide a separate merge() API.
This makes usages more compact.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109852
Add two levels of verification for MemorySSA: Fast and Full.
The defaults are kept the same. Full verification always occurs under
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS, but now it can also be requested in a specific pass for
debugging purposes.
This extends the reduction logic in the vectorizer to handle intrinsic
versions of min and max, both the floating point variants already
created by instcombine under fastmath and the integer variants from
D98152.
As a bonus this allows us to match a chain of min or max operations into
a single reduction, similar to how add/mul/etc work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109645
Added '-print-pipeline-passes' printing of parameters for those passes
declared with *_WITH_PARAMS macro in PassRegistry.def.
Note that it only prints the parameters declared inside *_WITH_PARAMS as
in a few cases there appear to be additional parameters not parsable.
The following passes are now covered (i.e. all of those with *_WITH_PARAMS in
PassRegistry.def).
LoopExtractorPass - loop-extract
HWAddressSanitizerPass - hwsan
EarlyCSEPass - early-cse
EntryExitInstrumenterPass - ee-instrument
LowerMatrixIntrinsicsPass - lower-matrix-intrinsics
LoopUnrollPass - loop-unroll
AddressSanitizerPass - asan
MemorySanitizerPass - msan
SimplifyCFGPass - simplifycfg
LoopVectorizePass - loop-vectorize
MergedLoadStoreMotionPass - mldst-motion
GVN - gvn
StackLifetimePrinterPass - print<stack-lifetime>
SimpleLoopUnswitchPass - simple-loop-unswitch
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109310
This fixes a violation of the wrap flag rules introduced in c4048d8f. As noted in the original review, the NUW is legal to infer from the structure of the replacee, but a) there's no test coverage, and b) this should be done generically for all multiplies.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109782
SCEV does not look through non-header PHIs inside the loop. Such phis
can be analyzed by adding separate accesses for each incoming pointer
value.
This results in 2 more loops vectorized in SPEC2000/186.crafty and
avoids regressions when sinking instructions before vectorizing.
Fixes PR50296, PR50288.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102266
This is for Swift VFE support. In some vtable forms that Swift emits, the "base" of a relative pointer is not the global symbol itself directly, but a GEP into it -- so the pointer is relative to a particular field in the global. So getPointerAtOffset() needs to be able to see through the GEP and allow it in a SUB expression, to correctly recognize the offset as a vtable slot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109169
Pass the access type to getPtrStride(), so it is not determined
from the pointer element type. Many cases still fetch the element
type at a higher level though, so this only partially addresses
the issue.
This reapplies commit 7dbba3376f, or, put
differently, this reverts commit d9a8d20827.
The test now requires the amdgpu and nvptx backend explicitly as it
won't work without properly.
Not all address spaces support initializers for globals and we can
therefore not set them without checking if they are allowed. This
patch adds a hook into TTI to check if an AS allows non-undef
initializers. We disable it for all but address space 0 by default,
NVPTX and AMDGPU targets allow all but address space 3.
Reviewed By: tra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109337
It's possible in some cases for the LHS to be a pointer where the RHS is not. This isn't directly possible for an icmp, but the analysis mixes up operands of different icmp expressions in some cases.
This does not include a test case as the smallest reduced case we've managed is extremely fragile and unlikely to test anything meaningful in the long term.
Also add an assertion to getNotSCEV() to make tracking down this sort of issue a bit easier in the future.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51787 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109546
This bit of code is incredibly suspicious. It allows fully unknown (but potentially negative) steps, but not steps known to be negative. The comment about scev flag inference is worrying, but also not correct to my knowledge.
At best, this might be covering up some related miscompile. However, there's no test in tree for it, the review history doesn't include obvious motivation, and the C++ example doesn't appear to give wrong results when hand translated to IR. I think it's time to remove this and see what falls out.
During review, there were concerns raised about the correctness of the corresponding signed case. This change was deliberately narrowed to the unsigned case which has been auditted and appears correct for negative values. We need to get back to the known-negative signed case, but that'll be a future patch if nothing falls out from this one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104140
In general, howManyLessThans doesn't really want to work with pointers
at all; the result is an integer, and the operands of the icmp are
effectively integers. However, isLoopEntryGuardedByCond doesn't like
extra ptrtoint casts, so the arguments to isLoopEntryGuardedByCond need
to be computed without those casts.
Somehow, the values got mixed up with the recent howManyLessThans
improvements; fix the confused values, and add a better comment to
explain what's happening.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109465
This renames the primary methods for creating a zero value to `getZero`
instead of `getNullValue` and renames predicates like `isAllOnesValue`
to simply `isAllOnes`. This achieves two things:
1) This starts standardizing predicates across the LLVM codebase,
following (in this case) ConstantInt. The word "Value" doesn't
convey anything of merit, and is missing in some of the other things.
2) Calling an integer "null" doesn't make any sense. The original sin
here is mine and I've regretted it for years. This moves us to calling
it "zero" instead, which is correct!
APInt is widely used and I don't think anyone is keen to take massive source
breakage on anything so core, at least not all in one go. As such, this
doesn't actually delete any entrypoints, it "soft deprecates" them with a
comment.
Included in this patch are changes to a bunch of the codebase, but there are
more. We should normalize SelectionDAG and other APIs as well, which would
make the API change more mechanical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109483
We were returning a tuple when all but one caller only cared about one piece of the return value. That one caller can inline the complexity, and we can simplify all other uses.
Users of delinearization assume that the the offset into the array element is zero. In most cases it will indeed be zero, but if it is not, the delinearization has to fail since it violates that assumption without the API even allowing to signal to the caller that the by offset is non-zero.
This bug caused Polly to miscompile blender (526.blender_r from SPEC CPU 2017) in -polly-process-unprofitable mode. The SCEV expression incorrectly delinearized has been reduced in the test case byte_offset.ll. The dropped offset into the array element of size 4 (a float) is ((sext i32 %mul7.i4534 to i64) + {(sext i32 %i1 to i64),+,((sext i32 (1 + ((1 + %shl.i.i) * (1 + %shl.i.i)) + %shl.i.i) to i64) * (sext i32 %i1 to i64))}<%for.body703>). This significant component was just dropped, and the wrong pointer was computed when regenerating code from the remaining delinearized subscripts. This occurred during blender's subsurface scattering implementation. As a result, blender's rendering diverged from the reference image.
Patch D108885 would also fix the API.
Reviewed By: bmahjour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109133
The implementation is mostly copied from MemDepAnalysis. We want to look
at all loads and stores to the same pointer operand. Bitcasts and zero
GEPs of a pointer are considered the same pointer value. We choose the
most dominating instruction.
Since updating MemorySSA with invariant.group is non-trivial, for now
handling of invariant.group is not cached in any way, so it's part of
the walker. The number of loads/stores with invariant.group is small for
now anyway. We can revisit if this actually noticeably affects compile
times.
To avoid invariant.group affecting optimized uses, we need to have
optimizeUsesInBlock() not use invariant.group in any way.
Co-authored-by: Piotr Padlewski <prazek@google.com>
Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109134
None of this logic has anything to do with SCEV's internals, it just uses the existing public APIs. As a result, we can move the code from ScalarEvolution.cpp/hpp to Delinearization.cpp/hpp with only minor changes.
This was discussed in advance on today's loop opt call. It turned out to be easy as hoped.
The basic problem being solved is that we largely give up when encountering a trip count involving an IV which is not an addrec. We will fall back to the brute force constant eval, but that doesn't have the information about the fact that we can't cycle back through the same set of values.
There's a high level design question of whether this is the right place to handle this, and if not, where that place is. The major alternative here would be to return a conservative upper bound, and then rely on two invocations of indvars to add the facts to the narrow IV, and then reconstruct SCEV. (I have not implemented the alternative and am not 100% sure this would work out.) That's arguably more in line with existing code, but I find this substantially easier to reason about. During review, no one expressed a strong opinion, so we went with this one.
Differential Revision: D108651
Follow on to D109029. I realized we had no mention of mustprogrress in the comment (as it prexisted mustprogress in the codebase). In the process of adding it, I tweaked the preconditions into something I think is more clear. Note that mustprogress is checked in the code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109091
Support opaque pointers in SymbolicallyEvaluateGEP() by using the
value type of a GlobalValue base or falling back to i8 if there
isn't one. We don't unconditionally generate i8 GEPs here because
that would lose inrange attribues, and because some optimizations
on globals currently rely on GEP types (e.g. the globals SROA
mentioned in the comment).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109297
Due to a typo, this replaced %x with umax(C1, umin(C2, %x + C3))
rather than umax(C1, umin(C2, %x)). This didn't make a difference
for the existing tests, because the result is only used for range
calculation, and %x will usually have an unknown starting range,
and the additional offset keeps it unknown. However, if %x already
has a known range, we may compute a result range that is too
small.
The current IRSimilarityIdentifier does not try to find similarity across blocks, this patch provides a mechanism to compare two branches against one another, to find similarity across basic blocks, rather than just within them.
This adds a step in the similarity identification process that labels all of the basic blocks so that we can identify the relative branching locations. Within an IRSimilarityCandidate we use these relative locations to determine whether if the branching to other relative locations in the same region is the same between branches. If they are, we consider them similar.
We do not consider the relative location of the branch if the target branch is outside of the region. In this case, both branches must exit to a location outside the region, but the exact relative location does not matter.
Reviewers: paquette, yroux
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106989
If the vector is a splat of some scalar value, findScalarElement()
can simply return the scalar value if it knows the requested lane
is in the vector.
This is only needed for scalable vectors, because the InsertElement/ShuffleVector
case is already handled explicitly for the fixed-width case.
This helps to recognize an InstCombine fold like:
extractelt(bitcast(splat(%v))) -> bitcast(%v)
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107254
Recommit of 707ce34b06. Don't introduce a
dependency to the LLVMPasses component, instead register the required
passes individually.
Add methods for loop unrolling to the OpenMPIRBuilder class and use them in Clang if `-fopenmp-enable-irbuilder` is enabled. The unrolling methods are:
* `unrollLoopFull`
* `unrollLoopPartial`
* `unrollLoopHeuristic`
`unrollLoopPartial` and `unrollLoopHeuristic` can use compiler heuristics to automatically determine the unroll factor. If possible, that is if no CanonicalLoopInfo is required to pass to another method, metadata for LLVM's LoopUnrollPass is added. Otherwise the unroll factor is determined using the same heurstics as user by LoopUnrollPass. Not requiring a CanonicalLoopInfo, especially with `unrollLoopHeuristic` allows greater flexibility.
With full unrolling and partial unrolling with known unroll factor, instead of duplicating instructions by the OpenMPIRBuilder, the full unroll is still delegated to the LoopUnrollPass. In case of partial unrolling the loop is first tiled using the existing `tileLoops` methods, then the inner loop fully unrolled using the same mechanism.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107764
When preinliner is used for CSSPGO, we try to honor global preinliner decision as much as we can except for uninlinable callees. We rely on InlineCost::Never to prevent us from illegal inlining.
However, it turns out that we use InlineCost::Never for both illeagle inlining and some of the "not-so-beneficial" inlining.
The most common one is recursive inlining, while it can bloat size a lot during CGSCC bottom-up inlining, it's less of a problem when recursive inlining is guided by profile and done in top-down manner.
Ideally it'd be better to have a clear separation between inline legality check vs cost-benefit check, but that requires a bigger change.
This change enables InlineCost computation to allow inlining recursive calls, controlled by InlineParams. In SampleLoader, we now enable recursive inlining for CSSPGO when global preinliner decision is used.
With this change, we saw a few perf improvements on SPEC2017 with CSSPGO and preinliner on: 2% for povray_r, 6% for xalancbmk_s, 3% omnetpp_s, while size is about the same (no noticeable perf change for all other benchmarks)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109104
This patch introduces four new string attributes: function-inline-cost,
function-inline-threshold, call-inline-cost and call-threshold-bonus.
These attributes allow you to selectively override some aspects of
InlineCost analysis. That would allow us to test inliner separately from
the InlineCost analysis.
That could be useful when you're trying to write tests for inliner and
you need to test some very specific situation, like "the inline cost has
to be this high", or "the threshold has to be this low". Right now every
time someone does that, they have get creative to come up with a way to
make the InlineCost give them the number they need (like adding ~30
load/add pairs for a trivial test). This process can be somewhat tedious
which can discourage some people from writing enough tests for their
changes. Also, that results in tests that are fragile and can be easily
broken without anyone noticing it because the test writer can't
explicitly control what input the inliner will get from the inline cost
analysis.
These new attributes will alleviate those problems to an extent.
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109033
Please refer to
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-September/152440.html
(and that whole thread.)
TLDR: the original patch had no prior RFC, yet it had some changes that
really need a proper RFC discussion. It won't be productive to discuss
such an RFC, once it's actually posted, while said patch is already
committed, because that introduces bias towards already-committed stuff,
and the tree is potentially in broken state meanwhile.
While the end result of discussion may lead back to the current design,
it may also not lead to the current design.
Therefore i take it upon myself
to revert the tree back to last known good state.
This reverts commit 4c4093e6e3.
This reverts commit 0a2b1ba33a.
This reverts commit d9873711cb.
This reverts commit 791006fb8c.
This reverts commit c22b64ef66.
This reverts commit 72ebcd3198.
This reverts commit 5fa6039a5f.
This reverts commit 9efda541bf.
This reverts commit 94d3ff09cf.
Breaks build with -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON
```
CMake Error: The inter-target dependency graph contains the following strongly connected component (cycle):
"LLVMFrontendOpenMP" of type SHARED_LIBRARY
depends on "LLVMPasses" (weak)
"LLVMipo" of type SHARED_LIBRARY
depends on "LLVMFrontendOpenMP" (weak)
"LLVMCoroutines" of type SHARED_LIBRARY
depends on "LLVMipo" (weak)
"LLVMPasses" of type SHARED_LIBRARY
depends on "LLVMCoroutines" (weak)
depends on "LLVMipo" (weak)
At least one of these targets is not a STATIC_LIBRARY. Cyclic dependencies are allowed only among static libraries.
CMake Generate step failed. Build files cannot be regenerated correctly.
```
This reverts commit 707ce34b06.
Add methods for loop unrolling to the OpenMPIRBuilder class and use them in Clang if `-fopenmp-enable-irbuilder` is enabled. The unrolling methods are:
* `unrollLoopFull`
* `unrollLoopPartial`
* `unrollLoopHeuristic`
`unrollLoopPartial` and `unrollLoopHeuristic` can use compiler heuristics to automatically determine the unroll factor. If possible, that is if no CanonicalLoopInfo is required to pass to another method, metadata for LLVM's LoopUnrollPass is added. Otherwise the unroll factor is determined using the same heurstics as user by LoopUnrollPass. Not requiring a CanonicalLoopInfo, especially with `unrollLoopHeuristic` allows greater flexibility.
With full unrolling and partial unrolling with known unroll factor, instead of duplicating instructions by the OpenMPIRBuilder, the full unroll is still delegated to the LoopUnrollPass. In case of partial unrolling the loop is first tiled using the existing `tileLoops` methods, then the inner loop fully unrolled using the same mechanism.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107764
There's a silent bug in our reasoning about zero strides. We assume that having a single static exit implies that if that exit is not taken, then the loop must be infinite. This ignores the potential for abnormal exits via exceptions. Consider the following example:
for (uint_8 i = 0; i < 1; i += 0) {
throw_on_thousandth_call();
}
Our reasoning is such that we'd conclude this loop can't take the backedge as that would lead to a (presumed) infinite loop.
In practice, this is a silent bug because the loopIsFiniteByAssumption returns false strictly more often than the loopHaNoAbnormalExits property. We could reasonable want to change that in the future, so fixing the codeflow now is worthwhile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109029
Store the used element type in the InductionDescriptor. For typed
pointers, it remains the pointer element type. For opaque pointers,
we always use an i8 element type, such that the step is a simple
offset.
A previous version of this patch instead tried to guess the element
type from an induction GEP, but this is not reliable, as the GEP
may be hidden (see @both in iv_outside_user.ll).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104795
This extends D108921 into a generic rule applied to constructing ExitLimits along all paths. The remaining paths (primarily howFarToZero) don't have the same reasoning about UB sensitivity as the howManyLessThan ones did. Instead, the remain cause for max counts being more precise than exact counts is that we apply context sensitive loop guards on the max path, and not on the exact path. That choice is mildly suspect, but out of scope of this patch.
The MVETailPredication.cpp change deserves a bit of explanation. We were previously figuring out that two SCEVs happened to be equal because the happened to be identical. When we optimized one with context sensitive information, but not the other, we lost the ability to prove them equal. So, cover this case by subtracting and then applying loop guards again. Without this, we see changes in test/CodeGen/Thumb2/mve-blockplacement.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109015
This patch is specifically the howManyLessThan case. There will be a couple of followon patches for other codepaths.
The subtle bit is explaining why the two codepaths have a difference while both are correct. The test case with modifications is a good example, so let's discuss in terms of it.
* The previous exact bounds for this example of (-126 + (126 smax %n))<nsw> can evaluate to either 0 or 1. Both are "correct" results, but only one of them results in a well defined loop. If %n were 127 (the only possible value producing a trip count of 1), then the loop must execute undefined behavior. As a result, we can ignore the TC computed when %n is 127. All other values produce 0.
* The max taken count computation uses the limit (i.e. the maximum value END can be without resulting in UB) to restrict the bound computation. As a result, it returns 0 which is also correct.
WARNING: The logic above only holds for a single exit loop. The current logic for max trip count would be incorrect for multiple exit loops, except that we never call computeMaxBECountForLT except when we can prove either a) no overflow occurs in this IV before exit, or b) this is the sole exit.
An alternate approach here would be to add the limit logic to the symbolic path. I haven't played with this extensively, but I'm hesitant because a) the term is optional and b) I'm not sure it'll reliably simplify away. As such, the resulting code quality from expansion might actually get worse.
This was noticed while trying to figure out why D108848 wasn't NFC, but is otherwise standalone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108921
To support Virtual Function Elimination to Swift, this PR adds support for Swift
vtables which contain "relative pointers" instead of direct pointer references.
These are in the form of:
@symbol = ... {
i32 trunc (i64 sub (i64 ptrtoint (<type> @target to i64), i64 ptrtoint (... @symbol to i64)) to i32)
}
The PR extends GlobalDCE's way of looking up a vtable offset into a dependency
to be able to see through this expression and find the target symbol.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107645
ExposePointerBase() in SCEVExpander implements basically the same
functionality as removePointerBase() in SCEV, so reuse it.
The SCEVExpander code assumes that the pointer operand on adds is
the last one -- I'm not sure that always holds. As such this might
not be strictly NFC.
When the initial relationship between two pairs of values between
similar sections is ambiguous to commutativity, arguments to the
outlined functions can be passed in such that the order is incorrect,
causing miscompilations. This adds a canonical mapping to each
similarity section, so that we can maintain the relationship of global
value numbering from one section to another.
Added Tests:
Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-commutative-operands-opposite-order.ll
unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp - IRSimilarityCandidate:CanonicalNumbering
Reviewers: jroelofs, jpaquette, yroux
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104143
This was previously committed in 914836b, and reverted due to confusion on the status of the review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108601
These are similar to the rotate pattern added with:
dcf659e821
...but we don't have guard ops on the shift amount,
so we don't canonicalize to the intrinsic.
declare void @llvm.assume(i1)
define i32 @src(i32 %shamt, i32 %bitwidth) {
; subtract must be in range of bitwidth
%lt = icmp ule i32 %bitwidth, 32
call void @llvm.assume(i1 %lt)
%r = lshr i32 -1, %shamt
%s = sub i32 %bitwidth, %shamt
%l = shl i32 -1, %s
%o = or i32 %r, %l
ret i32 %o
}
define i32 @tgt(i32 %shamt, i32 %bitwidth) {
ret i32 -1
}
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/aF7WHx
If we no an addrec doesn't self-wrap, the increment is strictly positive, and the start value is the smallest representable value, then we know that the corresponding wrap type can not occur.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108601
When using final reward (which is now the default), we were skipping
logging decisions that were leading to callee deletion. This fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108587
Because of an odd linking problem, we need to temporarily support
building with TF C API 1.15 + tensorflow 2.50 pip package in
'development' mode scenarios. Protobuf Message 'Swap' is partially
implemented in the header (2.50) and relies on a symbol not found in TF
C API 1.15. std::move avoids that, at no semantic cost.
This reverts commit f4122398e7 to
investigate a crash exposed by it.
The patch breaks building the code below with `clang -O2 --target=aarch64-linux`
int a;
double b, c;
void d() {
for (; a; a++) {
b += c;
c = a;
}
}
This was probably bugging more than is reasonable, but it makes merging
changes in this file slightly less annoying to have the trailing comma
here. I only noticed this because Rust is currently carrying a patch to
this file and it kept making life a little difficult.
I have added a new TTI interface called enableOrderedReductions() that
controls whether or not ordered reductions should be enabled for a
given target. By default this returns false, whereas for AArch64 it
returns true and we rely upon the cost model to make sensible
vectorisation choices. It is still possible to override the new TTI
interface by setting the command line flag:
-force-ordered-reductions=true|false
I have added a new RUN line to show that we use ordered reductions by
default for SVE and Neon:
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/strict-fadd.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/scalable-strict-fadd.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106653
According to the langref, it is valid to have multiple consecutive
lifetime start or end intrinsics on the same object.
For llvm.lifetime.start:
"If ptr [...] is a stack object that is already alive, it simply
fills all bytes of the object with poison."
For llvm.lifetime.end:
"Calling llvm.lifetime.end on an already dead alloca is no-op."
However, we currently fail an assertion in such cases. I've observed
the assertion failure when the loop vectorization pass duplicates
the intrinsic.
We can conservatively handle these intrinsics by ignoring all but
the first one, which can be implemented by removing the assertions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108337
Nest from being perfect
Expand LoopNestAnalysis to return the full list of instructions that
cause a loop nest to be imperfect. This is useful for other passes to
know if they should continue for in the inner loops.
Added New function getInterveningInstructions
that returns a small vector with the instructions that prevent a loop
for being perfect. Also added a couple of helper functions to reduce
code duplication.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107773
This option has been enabled by default for quite a while now.
The practical impact of removing the option is that MSSA use
cannot be disabled in default pipelines (both LPM and NPM) and
in manual LPM invocations. NPM can still choose to enable/disable
MSSA using loop vs loop-mssa.
The next step will be to require MSSA for LICM and drop the
AST-based implementation entirely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108075
Since then, the SCEV pointer handling as been improved,
so the assertion should now hold.
This reverts commit b96114c1e1,
relanding the assertion from commit 141e845da5.
Some files still contained the old University of Illinois Open Source
Licence header. This patch replaces that with the Apache 2 with LLVM
Exception licence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107528
Clang diagnostics refer to identifier names in quotes.
This patch makes inline remarks conform to the convention.
New behavior:
```
% clang -O2 -Rpass=inline -Rpass-missed=inline -S a.c
a.c:4:25: remark: 'foo' inlined into 'bar' with (cost=-30, threshold=337) at callsite bar:0:25; [-Rpass=inline]
int bar(int a) { return foo(a); }
^
```
Reviewed By: hoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107791
This is already done within InstCombine:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/MiGE22
...but leaving it out of analysis makes it
harder to avoid infinite loops there.
This is already done within InstCombine:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/MiGE22
...but leaving it out of analysis makes it
harder to avoid infinite loops there.
Teach LV to use masked-store to support interleave-store-group with
gaps (instead of scatters/scalarization).
The symmetric case of using masked-load to support
interleaved-load-group with gaps was introduced a while ago, by
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53668; This patch completes the store-scenario
leftover from D53668, and solves PR50566.
Reviewed by: Ayal Zaks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104750
fix an assertion due to mismatch type for Numerator and CacheLineSize in loop cache analysis pass.
Reviewed By: bmahjour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107618
1) add some self-diagnosis (when asserts are enabled) to check that all
features have the same nr of entries
2) avoid storing pointers to mutable fields because the proto API
contract doesn't actually guarantee those stay fixed even if no further
mutation of the object occurs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107594
This is recommit of the patch 16ff91ebcc,
reverted in 0c28a7c990 because it had
an error in call of getFastMathFlags (base type should be FPMathOperator
but not Instruction). The original commit message is duplicated below:
Clang has builtin function '__builtin_isnan', which implements C
library function 'isnan'. This function now is implemented entirely in
clang codegen, which expands the function into set of IR operations.
There are three mechanisms by which the expansion can be made.
* The most common mechanism is using an unordered comparison made by
instruction 'fcmp uno'. This simple solution is target-independent
and works well in most cases. It however is not suitable if floating
point exceptions are tracked. Corresponding IEEE 754 operation and C
function must never raise FP exception, even if the argument is a
signaling NaN. Compare instructions usually does not have such
property, they raise 'invalid' exception in such case. So this
mechanism is unsuitable when exception behavior is strict. In
particular it could result in unexpected trapping if argument is SNaN.
* Another solution was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95948.
It is used in the cases when raising FP exceptions by 'isnan' is not
allowed. This solution implements 'isnan' using integer operations.
It solves the problem of exceptions, but offers one solution for all
targets, however some can do the check in more efficient way.
* Solution implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D96568 introduced a
hook 'clang::TargetCodeGenInfo::testFPKind', which injects target
specific code into IR. Now only SystemZ implements this hook and it
generates a call to target specific intrinsic function.
Although these mechanisms allow to implement 'isnan' with enough
efficiency, expanding 'isnan' in clang has drawbacks:
* The operation 'isnan' is hidden behind generic integer operations or
target-specific intrinsics. It complicates analysis and can prevent
some optimizations.
* IR can be created by tools other than clang, in this case treatment
of 'isnan' has to be duplicated in that tool.
Another issue with the current implementation of 'isnan' comes from the
use of options '-ffast-math' or '-fno-honor-nans'. If such option is
specified, 'fcmp uno' may be optimized to 'false'. It is valid
optimization in general, but it results in 'isnan' always returning
'false'. For example, in some libc++ implementations the following code
returns 'false':
std::isnan(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN())
The options '-ffast-math' and '-fno-honor-nans' imply that FP operation
operands are never NaNs. This assumption however should not be applied
to the functions that check FP number properties, including 'isnan'. If
such function returns expected result instead of actually making
checks, it becomes useless in many cases. The option '-ffast-math' is
often used for performance critical code, as it can speed up execution
by the expense of manual treatment of corner cases. If 'isnan' returns
assumed result, a user cannot use it in the manual treatment of NaNs
and has to invent replacements, like making the check using integer
operations. There is a discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D18513#387418,
which also expresses the opinion, that limitations imposed by
'-ffast-math' should be applied only to 'math' functions but not to
'tests'.
To overcome these drawbacks, this change introduces a new IR intrinsic
function 'llvm.isnan', which realizes the check as specified by IEEE-754
and C standards in target-agnostic way. During IR transformations it
does not undergo undesirable optimizations. It reaches instruction
selection, where is lowered in target-dependent way. The lowering can
vary depending on options like '-ffast-math' or '-ffp-model' so the
resulting code satisfies requested semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854
Before D45736, getc_unlocked was available by default, but turned off
for non-Cygwin/non-MinGW Windows. D45736 then added 9 more unlocked
functions, which were unavailable by default, but it also:
* left getc_unlocked enabled by default,
* removed the disabling line for Windows, and
* added code to enable getc_unlocked for GNU, Android, and OSX.
For consistency, make getc_unlocked unavailable by default. Maybe this
was the intent of D45736 anyway.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107527
Function exploreDirections() in DependenceAnalysis implements a recursive
algorithm for refining direction vectors. This algorithm has worst-case
complexity of O(3^(n+1)) where n is the number of common loop levels.
In this patch I'm adding a threshold to control the amount of time we
spend in doing MIV tests (which most of the time end up resulting in over
pessimistic direction vectors anyway).
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107159
These functions don't exist in android API levels < 21. A change in
llvm-12 (rG6dbf0cfcf789) caused Oz builds to emit this symbol assuming
it's available and thus is causing link errors. Simply disable it here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107509
Clang has builtin function '__builtin_isnan', which implements C
library function 'isnan'. This function now is implemented entirely in
clang codegen, which expands the function into set of IR operations.
There are three mechanisms by which the expansion can be made.
* The most common mechanism is using an unordered comparison made by
instruction 'fcmp uno'. This simple solution is target-independent
and works well in most cases. It however is not suitable if floating
point exceptions are tracked. Corresponding IEEE 754 operation and C
function must never raise FP exception, even if the argument is a
signaling NaN. Compare instructions usually does not have such
property, they raise 'invalid' exception in such case. So this
mechanism is unsuitable when exception behavior is strict. In
particular it could result in unexpected trapping if argument is SNaN.
* Another solution was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95948.
It is used in the cases when raising FP exceptions by 'isnan' is not
allowed. This solution implements 'isnan' using integer operations.
It solves the problem of exceptions, but offers one solution for all
targets, however some can do the check in more efficient way.
* Solution implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D96568 introduced a
hook 'clang::TargetCodeGenInfo::testFPKind', which injects target
specific code into IR. Now only SystemZ implements this hook and it
generates a call to target specific intrinsic function.
Although these mechanisms allow to implement 'isnan' with enough
efficiency, expanding 'isnan' in clang has drawbacks:
* The operation 'isnan' is hidden behind generic integer operations or
target-specific intrinsics. It complicates analysis and can prevent
some optimizations.
* IR can be created by tools other than clang, in this case treatment
of 'isnan' has to be duplicated in that tool.
Another issue with the current implementation of 'isnan' comes from the
use of options '-ffast-math' or '-fno-honor-nans'. If such option is
specified, 'fcmp uno' may be optimized to 'false'. It is valid
optimization in general, but it results in 'isnan' always returning
'false'. For example, in some libc++ implementations the following code
returns 'false':
std::isnan(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN())
The options '-ffast-math' and '-fno-honor-nans' imply that FP operation
operands are never NaNs. This assumption however should not be applied
to the functions that check FP number properties, including 'isnan'. If
such function returns expected result instead of actually making
checks, it becomes useless in many cases. The option '-ffast-math' is
often used for performance critical code, as it can speed up execution
by the expense of manual treatment of corner cases. If 'isnan' returns
assumed result, a user cannot use it in the manual treatment of NaNs
and has to invent replacements, like making the check using integer
operations. There is a discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D18513#387418,
which also expresses the opinion, that limitations imposed by
'-ffast-math' should be applied only to 'math' functions but not to
'tests'.
To overcome these drawbacks, this change introduces a new IR intrinsic
function 'llvm.isnan', which realizes the check as specified by IEEE-754
and C standards in target-agnostic way. During IR transformations it
does not undergo undesirable optimizations. It reaches instruction
selection, where is lowered in target-dependent way. The lowering can
vary depending on options like '-ffast-math' or '-ffp-model' so the
resulting code satisfies requested semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854
I'm not sure this is the best way to approach this,
but the situation is rather not very detectable unless we explicitly call it out when refusing to advise to unroll.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107271
ValueTracking should allow for value ranges that may satisfy
llvm.assume, instead of restricting the ranges only to values that
will always satisfy the condition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107298
The check for size_t parameter 1 was already here for snprintf_chk,
but it wasn't applied to regular snprintf. This could lead to
mismatching and eventually crashing as shown in:
https://llvm.org/PR50885
If a reduction Phi has a single user which `AND`s the Phi with a type mask,
`lookThroughAnd` will return the user of the Phi and the narrower type represented
by the mask. Currently this is only used for arithmetic reductions, whereas loops
containing logical reductions will create a reduction intrinsic using the widened
type, for example:
for.body:
%phi = phi i32 [ %and, %for.body ], [ 255, %entry ]
%mask = and i32 %phi, 255
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %ptr, i32 %iv
%load = load i8, i8* %gep
%ext = zext i8 %load to i32
%and = and i32 %mask, %ext
...
^ this will generate an and reduction intrinsic such as the following:
call i32 @llvm.vector.reduce.and.v8i32(<8 x i32>...)
The same example for an add instruction would create an intrinsic of type i8:
call i8 @llvm.vector.reduce.add.v8i8(<8 x i8>...)
This patch changes AddReductionVar to call lookThroughAnd for other integer
reductions, allowing loops similar to the example above with reductions such
as and, or & xor to vectorize.
Reviewed By: david-arm, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105632
D106850 introduced a simplification for llvm.vscale by looking at the
surrounding function's vscale_range attributes. The call that's being
simplified may not yet have been inserted into the IR. This happens for
example during function cloning.
This patch fixes the issue by checking if the instruction is in a
parent basic block.
Nikita Popov