As a result of this change, the basic_stringbuf constructor that
takes a mode ends up leaving __hm_ set to 0, causing the comparison
"__hm_ - __str_.data() < __noff" in seekoff() to succeed, which caused
the function to incorrectly return -1. The fix is to account for the
possibility of __hm_ being 0 when computing the distance from __hm_
to the start of the string.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41319
llvm-svn: 321124
Summary:
[libcxx] Fix basic_stringbuf constructor
The C++ Standard [stringbuf.cons]p1 defines the effects of the basic_stringbuf
constructor that takes ios_base::openmode as follows:
Effects: Constructs an object of class basic_stringbuf, initializing the
base class with basic_streambuf(), and initializing mode with which.
Postconditions: str() == "".
The default constructor of basic_streambuf shall initialize all its
pointer member objects to null pointers [streambuf.cons]p1.
Currently libc++ calls "str(string_type());" in the aforementioned constructor
setting basic_streambuf's pointers to a non-null value.
This patch removes the call (note that the postcondition str() == ""
remains valid because __str_ is default-initialized) and adds a test checking
that the basic_streambuf's pointers are null after construction.
Thanks Mikhail Maltsev for the patch.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40707
llvm-svn: 320604
Summary:
This patch improves how libc++ handles min/max macros within the headers. Previously libc++ would undef them and emit a warning.
This patch changes libc++ to use `#pragma push_macro` to save the macro before undefining it, and `#pragma pop_macro` to restore the macros and the end of the header.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, bcraig, compnerd, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, krytarowski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33080
llvm-svn: 304357
The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to
__attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference
is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on
templates).
This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS.
llvm-svn: 291035
No point in pretending that these methods are hidden - they are
actually exported from libc++.so. Extern template declarations make
them part of libc++ ABI.
This patch does not change libc++.so export list (at least on Linux).
llvm-svn: 255177
Peter Collingbourne