especially C++ code, and generally expand the test coverage.
Logic adapted from a patch by Kaelyn Uhrain <rikka@google.com> and
another Googler.
llvm-svn: 125775
and turn on __has_feature(cxx_rvalue_references). The core rvalue
references proposal seems to be fully implemented now, pending lots
more testing.
llvm-svn: 124169
For example:
class A{
public:
A& operator=(const A& that) {
if (this != &that) {
this->A::~A();
this->A::A(that); // <=== explicit constructor call.
}
return *this;
}
};
More work will be needed to support an explicit call to a template constructor.
llvm-svn: 123735
Objective-C declarations and statements. Fixes
<rdar://problem/8814576> (wrong source line for diagnostics about
missing ';'), and now we actually consume the ';' at the end of a
@compatibility_alias directive!
llvm-svn: 122855
1. Do not validate for uuid attribute if the type is template dependent.
2. Search every class declaration and definition for the uuid attribute.
llvm-svn: 122578
and 'default' statements, including a Fix-It to add the colon:
test/Parser/switch-recovery.cpp:13:12: error: expected ':' after 'case'
case 17 // expected-error{{expected ':' after 'case'}}
^
:
test/Parser/switch-recovery.cpp:16:12: error: expected ':' after 'default'
default // expected-error{{expected ':' after 'default'}}
^
:
llvm-svn: 122522
protocol-qualifier list without a leading type (e.g., <#blah#>), don't
complain about it being an archaic protocol-qualifier list unless it
actually parses as one.
llvm-svn: 119805
The extra data stored on user-defined literal Tokens is stored in extra
allocated memory, which is managed by the PreprocessorLexer because there isn't
a better place to put it that makes sure it gets deallocated, but only after
it's used up. My testing has shown no significant slowdown as a result, but
independent testing would be appreciated.
llvm-svn: 112458
lexed method declarations.
This avoid interference with tokens coming after the point where the default arg tokens were 'injected', e.g. for
typedef struct Inst {
void m(int x=0);
} *InstPtr;
when parsing '0' the next token would be '*' and things would be messed up.
llvm-svn: 110436
parenthesized, unlike in C++, e.g.,
C has: typeof ( expression)
C++ has: typeof unary-expression
So, once we've parsed a parenthesized expression after typeof, we
should only go on to parse the postfix expression suffix if we're in
C++. Fixes <rdar://problem/8237491>.
llvm-svn: 109606
parser is looking at a declaration or an expression, use a '=' to
conclude that we are parsing a declaration.
This is wrong. However, our previous approach of finding a comma after
the '=' is also wrong, because the ',' could be part of a
template-argument-list. So, for now we're going to use the same wrong
heuristic as GCC and Visual C++, because less real-world code is
likely to be broken this way. I've opened PR7655 to keep track of our
wrongness; note also the XFAIL'd test.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8193163>.
llvm-svn: 108459
In the case of backtracking, the cached token lexer will be the only
lexer on the stack, without this the token stack will be empty and EOF
won't be returned.
This fixes PR7072.
llvm-svn: 108124
a function prototype is followed by a declarator if we
aren't parsing a K&R style identifier list.
Also, avoid skipping randomly after a declaration if a
semicolon is missing. Before we'd get:
t.c:3:1: error: expected function body after function declarator
void bar();
^
Now we get:
t.c:1:11: error: invalid token after top level declarator
void foo()
^
;
llvm-svn: 108105
As a bonus, fix the warning for || and && operators; it was emitted even if one of the operands had side effects, e.g:
x || test_logical_foo1();
emitted a bogus "expression result unused" for 'x'.
llvm-svn: 107274
For
void f( a:🅱️:c );
we would cache the tokens "a:🅱️:" but then we would try to annotate them using the range "a::".
Before annotating them with the (invalid) C++ scope spec, set it to the range of "a:🅱️:".
llvm-svn: 106536
declarator is incorrect. Not being a typename causes the parser to
dive down into the K&R identifier list handling stuff, which is almost
never the right thing to do.
Before:
r.c:3:17: error: expected ')'
void bar(intptr y);
^
r.c:3:9: note: to match this '('
void bar(intptr y);
^
r.c:3:10: error: a parameter list without types is only allowed in a function definition
void bar(intptr y);
^
After:
r.c:3:10: error: unknown type name 'intptr'; did you mean 'intptr_t'?
void bar(intptr y);
^~~~~~
intptr_t
r.c:1:13: note: 'intptr_t' declared here
typedef int intptr_t;
^
This fixes rdar://7980651 - poor recovery for bad type in the first arg of a C function
llvm-svn: 103783
Objective-C++ have a more complex grammar than in Objective-C
(surprise!), because
(1) The receiver of an instance message can be a qualified name such
as ::I or identity<I>::type.
(2) Expressions in C++ can start with a type.
The receiver grammar isn't actually ambiguous; it just takes a bit of
work to parse past the type before deciding whether we have a type or
expression. We do this in two places within the grammar: once for
message sends and once when we're determining whether a []'d clause in
an initializer list is a message send or a C99 designated initializer.
This implementation of Objective-C++ message sends contains one known
extension beyond GCC's implementation, which is to permit a
typename-specifier as the receiver type for a class message, e.g.,
[typename compute_receiver_type<T>::type method];
Note that the same effect can be achieved in GCC by way of a typedef,
e.g.,
typedef typename computed_receiver_type<T>::type Computed;
[Computed method];
so this is merely a convenience.
Note also that message sends still cannot involve dependent types or
values.
llvm-svn: 102031
of buildbots with:
error: 'error' diagnostics expected but not seen:
Line 9: too few elements in vector initialization (expected 8 elements, have 2)
1 warning and 1 error generated.
llvm-svn: 101864
LookupInObjCMethod. Doing so allows all sorts of invalid code
to slip through to codegen. This patch does not change the
AST representation of super, though that would now be a natural
thing to do since it can only be in the receiver position and
in the base of a ObjCPropertyRefExpr.
There are still several ugly areas handling super in the parser,
but this is definitely a step in the right direction.
llvm-svn: 100959
destination type for initialization, assignment, parameter-passing,
etc. The main issue fixed here is that we used rather confusing
wording for diagnostics such as
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char const [2]' discards qualifiers,
expected 'char *' [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
We're not initializing a 'char const [2]', we're initializing a 'char
*' with an expression of type 'char const [2]'. Similar problems
existed for other diagnostics in this area, so I've normalized them all
with more precise descriptive text to say what we're
initializing/converting/assigning/etc. from and to. The warning for
the code above is now:
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char *' from an expression of type
'char const [2]' discards qualifiers [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
Fixes <rdar://problem/7447179>.
llvm-svn: 100832
- When instantiating a friend type template, perform semantic
analysis on the resulting type.
- Downgrade the errors concerning friend type declarations that do
not refer to classes to ExtWarns in C++98/03. C++0x allows
practically any type to be befriended, and ignores the friend
declaration if the type is not a class.
llvm-svn: 100635
Chandler Carruth