Commit Graph

27 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chandler Carruth 2946cd7010 Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 08:50:56 +00:00
David Blaikie 0da49a7ef1 PR40096: Forwards-compatible with C++20 rule regarding aggregates not having user-declared ctors
Looks like these were in place to make these types move-only. That's
generally not a feature that the type should prescribe (unless it's an
inherent limitation) - instead leaving it up to the users of a type.

llvm-svn: 349669
2018-12-19 19:33:35 +00:00
Fangrui Song 5313327f61 Add explicit dependency on clangSerialization for a bunch of components to fix -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on build
This is a more thorough fix of rC348911.
The story about -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on build after rC348907 (Move PCHContainerOperations from Frontend to Serialization) is:

1. libclangSerialization.so defines PCHContainerReader dtor, ...
2. clangFrontend and clangTooling define classes inheriting from PCHContainerReader, thus their DSOs have undefined references on PCHContainerReader dtor
3. Components depending on either clangFrontend or clangTooling cannot be linked unless they have explicit dependency on clangSerialization due to the default linker option -z defs. The explicit dependency could be avoided if libclang{Frontend,Tooling}.so had these undefined references.

This patch adds the explicit dependency on clangSerialization to make them build.

llvm-svn: 348915
2018-12-12 08:02:18 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 9fc8faf9e6 Remove \brief commands from doxygen comments.
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.

We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.

Patch produced by

for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320

llvm-svn: 331834
2018-05-09 01:00:01 +00:00
Roman Lebedev 497fd98af2 Revert "[Tooling] [0/1] Refactor FrontendActionFactory::create() to return std::unique_ptr<>"
This reverts commit rL326201

This broke gcc4.8 builds, compiler just segfaults:¬
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/builds/14909¬
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-linux-abi-test/builds/22673¬

llvm-svn: 326204
2018-02-27 15:54:55 +00:00
Roman Lebedev 6017bf4f31 [Tooling] [0/1] Refactor FrontendActionFactory::create() to return std::unique_ptr<>
Summary:
Noticed during review of D41102.

I'm not sure whether there are any principal reasons why it returns raw owning pointer,
or it is just a old code that was not updated post-C++11.

I'm not too sure what testing i should do, because `check-all` is not error clean here for some reason,
but it does not //appear// asif those failures are related to these changes.

This is clang part.
Clang-tools-extra part is D43780.

Reviewers: klimek, bkramer, alexfh, pcc

Reviewed By: alexfh

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43779

llvm-svn: 326201
2018-02-27 15:19:20 +00:00
Don Hinton 050b4b05a0 [cmake] Delete redundant install command for clang-refactor.
Summary: Install targets for clang tools are controlled by
CLANG_BUILD_TOOLS, and when OFF, cmake issues the following warning:

WARNING: Target "clang-refactor" has EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL set and will not
be built by default but an install rule has been provided for it.
CMake does not define behavior for this case.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41807

llvm-svn: 322147
2018-01-10 01:00:28 +00:00
Shoaib Meenai d806af3499 [CMake] Use PRIVATE in target_link_libraries for executables
We currently use target_link_libraries without an explicit scope
specifier (INTERFACE, PRIVATE or PUBLIC) when linking executables.
Dependencies added in this way apply to both the target and its
dependencies, i.e. they become part of the executable's link interface
and are transitive.

Transitive dependencies generally don't make sense for executables,
since you wouldn't normally be linking against an executable. This also
causes issues for generating install export files when using
LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS. For example, clang has a lot of LLVM
library dependencies, which are currently added as interface
dependencies. If clang is in the distribution components but the LLVM
libraries it depends on aren't (which is a perfectly legitimate use case
if the LLVM libraries are being built static and there are therefore no
run-time dependencies on them), CMake will complain about the LLVM
libraries not being in export set when attempting to generate the
install export file for clang. This is reasonable behavior on CMake's
part, and the right thing is for LLVM's build system to explicitly use
PRIVATE dependencies for executables.

Unfortunately, CMake doesn't allow you to mix and match the keyword and
non-keyword target_link_libraries signatures for a single target; i.e.,
if a single call to target_link_libraries for a particular target uses
one of the INTERFACE, PRIVATE, or PUBLIC keywords, all other calls must
also be updated to use those keywords. This means we must do this change
in a single shot. I also fully expect to have missed some instances; I
tested by enabling all the projects in the monorepo (except dragonegg),
and configuring both with and without shared libraries, on both Darwin
and Linux, but I'm planning to rely on the buildbots for other
configurations (since it should be pretty easy to fix those).

Even after this change, we still have a lot of target_link_libraries
calls that don't specify a scope keyword, mostly for shared libraries.
I'm thinking about addressing those in a follow-up, but that's a
separate change IMO.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40823

llvm-svn: 319840
2017-12-05 21:49:56 +00:00
Haojian Wu 200458f342 [clang-refactor] Introduce a new rename rule for qualified symbols
Summary: Prototype of a new rename rule for renaming qualified symbol.

Reviewers: arphaman, ioeric, sammccall

Reviewed By: arphaman, sammccall

Subscribers: jklaehn, cfe-commits, klimek

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39332

llvm-svn: 317672
2017-11-08 08:56:56 +00:00
Eric Liu c47fd014ae [clang-refactor] Use ClangTool more explicitly by making refaroing actions AST frontend actions.
Summary: This is a refactoring change. NFC

Reviewers: arphaman, hokein

Reviewed By: arphaman, hokein

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39675

llvm-svn: 317577
2017-11-07 14:35:03 +00:00
Petr Hosek 3cad20023b [clang-refactor] Use add_clang_tool CMake template
This allows including clang-refactor in LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS
to build clang-refactor as part of the toolchain distribution.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39266

llvm-svn: 316540
2017-10-25 01:11:27 +00:00
Alex Lorenz 7fe441b20d [refactor] Initial outline of implementation of "extract function" refactoring
This commit adds an initial, skeleton outline of the "extract function"
refactoring. The extracted function doesn't capture variables / rewrite code
yet, it just basically does a simple copy-paste.
The following initiation rules are specified:

- extraction can only be done for executable code in a function/method/block.
  This means that you can't extract a global variable initialize into a function
  right now.
- simple literals and references are not extractable.

This commit also adds support for full source ranges to clang-refactor's test
mode.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38982

llvm-svn: 316465
2017-10-24 17:18:45 +00:00
Haojian Wu 55186786a9 [clang-refactor] Add "-Inplace" option to the commandline tool.
Summary:
Change clang-refactor default behavior to print the new code after refactoring
(instead of editing the source files), which would make it easier to use
and debug the refactoring action.

Reviewers: arphaman, ioeric

Reviewed By: arphaman

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39092

llvm-svn: 316212
2017-10-20 12:37:16 +00:00
Alex Lorenz f5ca27cc37 [refactor] allow the use of refactoring diagnostics
This commit allows the refactoring library to use its own set of
refactoring-specific diagnostics to reports things like initiation errors.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38772

llvm-svn: 315924
2017-10-16 18:28:26 +00:00
Alex Lorenz 528435002a clang-refactor: Use llvm_unreachable in an unused override
As suggested by David Blaikie!

llvm-svn: 315923
2017-10-16 18:07:16 +00:00
Alex Lorenz e1b7b95901 Recommit r315738 "[clang-refactor] Apply source replacements"
The fixed commit ensures that ParsedSourceRange works correctly
with Windows paths.

Original message:

This commit actually brings clang-refactor to a usable state as it can now
apply the refactoring changes to source files.
The -selection option is now also fully supported.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38402

llvm-svn: 315918
2017-10-16 17:31:16 +00:00
Alex Lorenz 9ce566fc18 Revert r315738
The ParsedSourceRange class does not work correctly on Windows with the ':'
drive separators

llvm-svn: 315774
2017-10-13 22:47:44 +00:00
Alex Lorenz 3e3dd1dbd7 Fix -Woverloaded-virtual warning in clang-refactor
llvm-svn: 315755
2017-10-13 21:15:25 +00:00
Alex Lorenz 57e060b309 [clang-refactor] Apply source replacements
This commit actually brings clang-refactor to a usable state as it can now
apply the refactoring changes to source files.
The -selection option is now also fully supported.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38402

llvm-svn: 315738
2017-10-13 19:42:05 +00:00
Alex Lorenz ad38fbffad Recommit r315087 "[refactor] add support for refactoring options"
The recommit fixes a UB bug that occurred only on a small number of bots.

Original message:

This commit adds initial support for refactoring options. One can now use
optional and required std::string options.

This commit also adds a NewNameOption for the local-rename refactoring action to
allow rename to work with custom names.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37856

llvm-svn: 315661
2017-10-13 01:53:13 +00:00
Haojian Wu 21cc138f35 [clang-refactor] Fix clang-tidy misc-move-const-arg warning.
NFC

llvm-svn: 315290
2017-10-10 09:48:38 +00:00
Alex Lorenz cdb9a05a81 Revert r315087
clang-refactor crashes on some bots after this commit

llvm-svn: 315095
2017-10-06 19:49:29 +00:00
Alex Lorenz 15da33480b [refactor] add support for refactoring options
This commit adds initial support for refactoring options. One can now use
optional and required std::string options.

This commit also adds a NewNameOption for the local-rename refactoring action to
allow rename to work with custom names.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37856

llvm-svn: 315087
2017-10-06 18:12:29 +00:00
Alex Lorenz 3d712c46e6 [refactor] Use CommonOptionsParser in clang-refactor
This commit ensures that CommonOptionsParser works with subcommands. This allows
clang-refactor to use the CommonOptionsParser.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37618

llvm-svn: 313260
2017-09-14 13:16:14 +00:00
Alex Lorenz 23cd4d7c17 Link clang-refactor with clangFormat
This is an attempt to fix
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage after r313244.

llvm-svn: 313252
2017-09-14 10:46:29 +00:00
Alex Lorenz a2765181cc Link clang-refactor with clangAST and clangLex
This is an attempt to fix http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-i686-linux-RA/ after
r313244.

llvm-svn: 313249
2017-09-14 10:38:04 +00:00
Alex Lorenz b54ef6a2a4 [refactor] add clang-refactor tool with initial testing support and
local-rename action

This commit introduces the clang-refactor tool alongside the local-rename action
which uses the existing renaming engine used by clang-rename. The tool
doesn't actually perform the source transformations yet, it just provides
testing support. This commit also moves only one test from clang-rename over to
test/Refactor. I will continue to move the other tests throughout
development of clang-refactor.

The following options are supported by clang-refactor:

-v: use verbose output
-selection: The source range that corresponds to the portion of the source
 that's selected (currently only special command test:<file> is supported).

Please note that a follow-up commit will migrate clang-refactor to
libTooling's common option parser, so clang-refactor will be able to use
the common interface with compilation database and options like -p, -extra-arg,
etc.

The testing support provided by clang-refactor is described below:

When -selection=test:<file> is given, clang-refactor will parse the selection
commands from that file. The selection commands are grouped and the specified
refactoring action invoked by the tool. Each command in a group is expected to
produce an identical result. The precise syntax for the selection commands is
described in a comment in TestSupport.h.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36574

llvm-svn: 313244
2017-09-14 10:06:52 +00:00