Boostrapping LLVM+Clang+LLDB without threshold on object size for
lifetime markers insertion has shown there was no significant change
in compile time, so let the stack slot colorizer do its optimization
for all slots.
llvm-svn: 219303
to an out-parameter using the indirect-writeback conversion,
and we copied the current value of the variable to the temporary,
make sure that we register an intrinsic use of that value with
the optimizer so that the value won't get released until we have
a chance to retain it.
rdar://13195034
llvm-svn: 177813
arguments in function prologue is done
with objc_StoreStrong to pair it with
similar objc_StoreStrong for release in function
epilogue. This is done with -O0 only.
// rdar://13145317
llvm-svn: 175698
call sites as tail calls unconditionally. While it's theoretically true that
this is just an optimization, it's an optimization that we very much want to
happen even at -O0, or else ARC applications become substantially harder to
debug. See r169796 for the llvm/fast-isel side of things.
rdar://12553082
llvm-svn: 169996
objc_loadWeak. This retains and autorelease the weakly-refereced
object. This hidden autorelease sometimes makes __weak variable alive even
after the weak reference is erased, because the object is still referenced
by an autorelease pool. This patch overcomes this behavior by loading a
weak object via call to objc_loadWeakRetained(), followng it by objc_release
at appropriate place, thereby removing the hidden autorelease. // rdar://10849570
llvm-svn: 168740
generation for captured block variables in arc mode. This includes
inlined version of the meta-data when it can be done. It also includes
severat tests. This is wip. // rdar://12184410.
llvm-svn: 167241
combination of a load+objc_release; this is generally better
for tools that try to track why values are retained and
released. Also use objc_storeStrong when copying a block
(again, only at -O0), which requires us to do a preliminary
store of null in order to compensate for objc_storeStrong's
assign semantics.
llvm-svn: 166085
into the enclosing scope; this is a more accurate model but is
(I believe) unnecessary in my test case due to other flaws.
However, one of those flaws is now intentional: blocks which
appear in return statements can be trivially observed to not
extend in lifetime past the return, and so we can allow a jump
past them. Do the necessary magic in IR-generation to make
this work.
llvm-svn: 164589
literal helper functions. All helper functions (global
and locals) use block_invoke as their prefix. Local literal
helper names are prefixed by their enclosing mangled function
names. Blocks in non-local initializers (e.g. a global variable
or a C++11 field) are prefixed by their mangled variable name.
The descriminator number added to end of the name starts off
with blank (for first block) and _<N> (for the N+2-th block).
llvm-svn: 159206
initializer need be null initialized before initializer takes
hold, just like any other initialized retainable object pointer.
// rdar://11016025
llvm-svn: 158738
need to provide a 'dominating IP' which is guaranteed to
dominate the (de)activation point but which cannot be avoided
along any execution path from the (de)activation point to
the push-point of the cleanup. Using the entry block is
bad mojo.
llvm-svn: 144276
a previously-inactive cleanup, not only do we need a
flag variable, but we should also force the cleanup to
query the flag variable. However, we only need to do
this when we're activating in a context that's
conditionally executed; otherwise, we may safely
assume that the cleanup is dominated by the activation
point.
llvm-svn: 144271
full-expression. Naturally they're inactive before we enter
the block literal expression. This restores the intended
behavior that blocks belong to their enclosing scope.
There's a useful -O0 / compile-time optimization that we're
missing here with activating cleanups following straight-line
code from their inactive beginnings.
llvm-svn: 144268
block-typed __block variables using objc_retainBlock
and objc_dispose. Previously we were using
_Block_object_assign and _Block_object_destroy
with BLOCK_BYREF_CALLER, which causes the runtime
to completely ignore the retain and release.
In most cases this doesn't cause catastrophe
because the retain/release are balanced and
because the block in the variable was copied
upon assignment there. However, the stack
copy of the variable will be released when
it goes out of scope, which is a problem if
that value was released due to an assignment
to the heap copy. Similarly, a leak can occur
if the variable is assigned after the copy to
the heap.
llvm-svn: 144162
Arnaud A. de Grandmaison