Fixes llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian failure with 2f497ec3.
expandAtomicStore always modifies the function, so make sure we set
MadeChange unconditionally. Not sure how nobody else has stumbled over
this before.
When generating a all-one mask value whose bitwidth is larger than 64, signed extension should be used rather then zero extension.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120865
Produce remarks when atomic instructions are expanded into hardware instructions
in SIISelLowering.cpp. Currently, these remarks are only emitted for atomic fadd
instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108150
This patch uses AtomicExpandPass to implement quadword lock free atomic operations. It adopts the method introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/D47882, which expand atomic operations post RA to avoid spilling that might prevent LL/SC progress.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103614
If we're not emitting separate fences for the success/failure cases, we
need to pass the merged ordering to the target so it can emit the
correct instructions.
For the PowerPC testcase, we end up with extra fences, but that seems
like an improvement over missing fences. If someone wants to improve
that, the PowerPC backed could be taught to emit the fences after isel,
instead of depending on fences emitted by AtomicExpand.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33332 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103342
Follow the same strategy used for atomic loads/stores by converting the operands to equally-sized integer types.
This change prevents the atomic expansion pass from generating illegal LL/SC pairs when targeting AArch64: `expand-atomicrmw-xchg-fp.ll` would previously instantiate intrinsics such as `llvm.aarch64.ldaxr.p0f32` that cannot be lowered.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103232
And then push those change throughout LLVM.
Keep the old signature in Clang's CGBuilder for now -- that will be
updated in a follow-on patch (D97224).
The MLIR LLVM-IR dialect is not updated to support the new alignment
attribute, but preserves its existing behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97223
I recently modified this pass to better support CHERI-RISC-V and while
doing so I noticed that this pass was calling M->getOrInsertFunction()
with the result of TLI->getLibcallName(RTLibType). However, AMDGPU fills
the libcalls array with nullptr, so this creates an anonymous function
instead. This patch changes expandAtomicOpToLibcall to return false in
case the libcall does not exist and changes the assert() in the callees to
a report_fatal_error() instead.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88800
In cases where the alignment of the datatype is smaller than
expected by the instruction, the address is aligned. The aligned
address is used for the load, but wasn't used for the store
conditional, which resulted in a run-time alignment exception.
This is a followup on D78403.
I'm unsure about `getAtomicOpAlign` overloads that take `AtomicRMWInst` and `AtomicCmpXchgInst`, shouldn't `getAlign` provide the correct answer already?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81369
This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of recompilation.
I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the
number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits
multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the
current checkout:
recompiles touches affected_files header
342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h
314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h
162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h
158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h
131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files
to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in
an incremental rebuild.
Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
In preparation for supporting ILP32 on AArch64, this modifies the SelectionDAG
builder code so that pointers are allowed to have a larger type when "live" in
the DAG compared to memory.
Pointers get zero-extended whenever they are loaded, and truncated prior to
stores. In addition, a few not quite so obvious locations need updating:
* A GEP that has not been marked inbounds needs to enforce the IR-documented
2s-complement wrapping at the memory pointer size. Inbounds GEPs are
undefined if they overflow the address space, so no additional operations
are needed.
* Signed comparisons would give incorrect results if performed on the
zero-extended values.
This shouldn't affect CodeGen for now, but will become active when the AArch64
ILP32 support is committed.
llvm-svn: 359676
Add tests for wider atomic loads and stores. In the process, fix a crasher where we appearently handled unorder stores, but not loads, when lowering to cmpxchg idioms.
llvm-svn: 356482
Restore a reverted commit, with the silly mistake fixed. Sorry for the previous breakage.
Be consistent about how we treat atomics in non-zero address spaces. If we get to the backend, we tend to lower them as if in address space 0. Do the same if we need to insert a libcall instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58760
llvm-svn: 355540
Be consistent about how we treat atomics in non-zero address spaces. If we get to the backend, we tend to lower them as if in address space 0. Do the same if we need to insert a libcall instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58760
llvm-svn: 355453
This cleans up all LoadInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass the
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57172
llvm-svn: 352911
Recommit r352791 after tweaking DerivedTypes.h slightly, so that gcc
doesn't choke on it, hopefully.
Original Message:
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352827
This reverts commit f47d6b38c7 (r352791).
Seems to run into compilation failures with GCC (but not clang, where
I tested it). Reverting while I investigate.
llvm-svn: 352800
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352791
This broke the RISCV build, and even with that fixed, one of the RISCV
tests behaves surprisingly differently with asserts than without,
leaving there no clear test pattern to use. Generally it seems bad for
hte IR to differ substantially due to asserts (as in, an alloca is used
with asserts that isn't needed without!) and nothing I did simply would
fix it so I'm reverting back to green.
This also required reverting the RISCV build fix in r351782.
llvm-svn: 351796
Eli Friedman