Summary:
This protects calls to longjmp from transferring control to arbitrary
program points. Instead, longjmp calls are limited to the set of
registered setjmp return addresses.
This also implements /guard:nolongjmp to allow users to link in object
files that call setjmp that weren't compiled with /guard:cf. In this
case, the linker will approximate the set of address taken functions,
but it will leave longjmp unprotected.
I used the following program to test, compiling it with different -guard
flags:
$ cl -c t.c -guard:cf
$ lld-link t.obj -guard:cf
#include <setjmp.h>
#include <stdio.h>
jmp_buf buf;
void g() {
printf("before longjmp\n");
fflush(stdout);
longjmp(buf, 1);
}
void f() {
if (setjmp(buf)) {
printf("setjmp returned non-zero\n");
return;
}
g();
}
int main() {
f();
printf("hello world\n");
}
In particular, the program aborts when the code is compiled *without*
-guard:cf and linked with -guard:cf. That indicates that longjmps are
protected.
Reviewers: ruiu, inglorion, amccarth
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43217
llvm-svn: 325047
Also make a drive-by-fix of a bug in the subregister scan code that
only triggers with an incomplete or otherwise very irregular machine
description.
rdar://problem/37404493
This re-applies r324972 with an early exit in the case of a complete
failure to make this commit NFC again as intended.
llvm-svn: 325041
The InstCombine integer mul test file had tests that belong in InstSimplify
(including fmul tests). Move things to where they belong and auto-generate
complete checks for everything.
llvm-svn: 325037
If a function doesn't have an exact definition, don't apply debugify
metadata as it triggers a DIVerifier failure.
The issue is that it's invalid to have DILocations inside a DISubprogram
which isn't a definition ("scope points into the type hierarchy!").
llvm-svn: 325036
According to `llvm-dwarfdump --statistics` this salvages 43 additional
unique source variables in a stage2 build of clang. It increases the
size of the .debug_loc section by 0.002% (or 2864 bytes).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43220
llvm-svn: 325035
It caused "Cannot select: t33: f64 = AArch64ISD::FMOV Constant:i32<0>"
in Chromium builds. See PR36369.
> Get rid of icky goto loops and make the code easier to maintain (NFC).
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42723
llvm-svn: 325034
Summary:
If the and has an additional use we shouldn't invert it. That creates an additional instruction.
While there add a one use check to the transform above that looked similar.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43225
llvm-svn: 325019
Change ARMConstantIslandPass to:
- accept f16 literals as litpool entries,
- if the litpool needs to be inserted in the middle of a big block, then we
need to 4-byte align the next instruction in ARM mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42784
llvm-svn: 325012
The bug has been lying dormant, but apparently was never exposed, until
after rL324941 because we didn't return the correct result
for shifts with undef operands.
llvm-svn: 325010
Due to a typo in D41565, mutable TBAA tags created with
createMutableTBAAAccessTag() lose their base types. This patch
fixes that typo and updates tests respectively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42364
llvm-svn: 325008
For basic blocks with instructions between the beginning of the block
and a call we have to duplicate the instructions before the call in all
split blocks and add PHI nodes for uses of the duplicated instructions
after the call.
Currently, the threshold for the number of instructions before a call
is quite low, to keep the impact on binary size low.
Reviewers: junbuml, mcrosier, davidxl, davide
Reviewed By: junbuml
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41860
llvm-svn: 325001
In cases where the OuterMostLoopLatchBI only has a single successor,
accessing the second successor will fail.
This fixes a failure when building the test-suite with loop-interchange
enabled.
Reviewers: mcrosier, karthikthecool, davide
Reviewed by: karthikthecool
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42906
llvm-svn: 324994
We already try to salvage debug values from no-op bitcasts and inttoptr
instructions: we should handle ptrtoint instructions as well.
This saves an additional 24,444 debug values in a stage2 build of clang,
and (according to llvm-dwarfdump --statistics) provides an additional
289 unique source variables.
llvm-svn: 324982
Seeing some inlining missing in internal uses of symbolizer. I'll work
on a reproduction, tests, improvements & recommit as soon as possible.
(Chandler would like it to be known that this improvement did make
check-llvm 4x faster... - so there's certainly some fairly good
motivation to push on fixing/figuring this out & getting it back in)
This reverts commit r321345.
llvm-svn: 324981
Here are the number of additional debug values salvaged in a stage2
build of clang:
63 SALVAGE: MUL
1250 SALVAGE: SDIV
(No values were salvaged from `srem` instructions in this experiment,
but it's a simple case to handle so we might as well.)
llvm-svn: 324976
Here are the number of additional debug values salvaged in a stage2
build of clang:
1912 SALVAGE: ASHR
405 SALVAGE: LSHR
249 SALVAGE: SHL
llvm-svn: 324975
Also make a drive-by-fix of a bug in the subregister scan code that
only triggers with an incomplete or otherwise very irregular machine
description.
rdar://problem/37404493
llvm-svn: 324972
These intrinsic folds were added with D41381, but only allowed with isFast().
That's more than necessary because FMF has 'reassoc' to apply to these
kinds of folds after D39304, and that's all we need in these cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43160
llvm-svn: 324967
The diff to use 'reassoc' is part of D43160; it should not have
been made with rL324961. Reverting that part here, so we'll
see the intended diff with the code change.
llvm-svn: 324963
Summary:
This patch makes postdominators always recalculate the tree when an update causes to change the tree roots.
As @dmgreen noticed in [[ https://reviews.llvm.org/D41298 | D41298 ]], the previous implementation was not conservative enough and it was possible to end up with a PostDomTree that was different than a freshly computed one.
The patch also compares postdominators with a freshly computed tree at the end of full verification to make sure we don't hit similar issues in the future.
This should (ideally) be also backported to 6.0 before the release, although I don't have any reports of this causing an observable error. It should be safe to do it even if it's late in the release, as the change only makes the current behavior more conservative.
Reviewers: dmgreen, dberlin, davide, brzycki, grosser
Reviewed By: brzycki, grosser
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43140
llvm-svn: 324962
Some tests didn't add much value because we already show stronger
constraints for the folds in other tests, so the weaker versions
were deleted.
Moved the remaining tests into 1 file because the folds are
very similar and handled from 1 place in the code.
llvm-svn: 324961
Reid Kleckner