Also remove some bogus `std::forward`s. My impression is that these
forwards were actually harmless, because `ranges::begin(FWD(t))` is
always identical to `ranges::begin(t)` (except when it's ill-formed,
and that can't happen in this case). However, they're also superfluous
and don't reflect the wording in the standard, so let's eliminate them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117043
On Apple platforms, arc4random is faster than /dev/urandom, and it is
the recommended user-space RNG according to Apple's own OS folks.
This commit adds an ABI switch to guard ABI-break-protections in
std::random_device, and starts using arc4random instead of /dev/urandom
to implement std::random_device on Apple platforms.
Note that previously, `std::random_device` would allow passing a custom
token to its constructor, and that token would be interpreted as the name
of a file to read entropy from. This was implementation-defined and
undocumented. After this change, Apple platforms will be using arc4random()
instead, and any custom token passed to the constructor will be ignored.
This behavioral change will also impact other platforms that use the
arc4random() implementation, such as OpenBSD. This should be fine since
that is effectively a relaxation of the constructor's requirements.
rdar://86638350
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116045
Introduce `__fits_in_sso()` to put the constexpr tests into a central place.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116487
There are a lot of
```
#if _LIBCPP_DEBUG_LEVEL == 2
__get_db()->__insert_c(this);
#endif
```
This patch introduces `__debug_db_insert_c()` to put the `#if` in one central place.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116947
The NFC part of D116809. We still want to enforce this in CI,
but the mechanism for that is still to-be-determined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116809
Before this patch, the user needed to specialize both of
`is_placeholder<MyType>` and `is_placeholder<const MyType>`.
After this patch, only the former is needed (although the
latter is harmless if provided).
The new tests don't actually fail unless return type deduction
is used, which is a C++14 feature. Specializing `is_placeholder`
is still allowed in C++11, though.
Fixes#51095.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116388
The reason for those nested namespaces is explained in D115315:
> AIUI, this keeps the CPO's own type from ADL'ing into the `std::ranges`
> namespace; e.g. `foobar(std::ranges::uninitialized_default_construct)`
> should not consider `std::ranges::foobar` a candidate, even if
> `std::ranges::foobar` is not a CPO itself. Also, of course, consistency
> (Chesterton's Fence, the economist's hundred-dollar bill): if it were
> safe to omit the namespace, we'd certainly want to do it everywhere,
> not just here.
This makes these three niebloids more consistent with the other Ranges
niebloids we've already implemented, such as the `ranges::begin` group
and the `ranges::uninitialized_default_construct` group.
FWIW, we still have three different indentation-and-comment styles
among these three groups.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116569
This reverts commit 640beb38e7.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ibf8e397df94001f248fba609f072088a46abae08
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115960
Change-Id: Id169459ce4dfffa857d5645a0af50b0063ce1105
The fix in D116381 makes an existing exception message wrong. This
improves the message and fixes the associated unit tests.
Note other message can be also be improved, but that will be done later.
Changing these messages may cause merge conflicts with other patches
that are under review or WIP.
Depends on D116381
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116495
@CaseyCarter reported that the tests for the std-format-spec rejects leading
zeroes for precision, which the Standard does not require. The Standard allows
them. Only for precision, not for the width or an arg-id.
Fixes the precision parser and adds some test for the arg-id since they
were missing.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116381
Remove duplicate header includes from `<algorithm>` and reorder the includes
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, Mordante, #libc, jloser
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116507
`__cpp_lib_type_identity` was implemented way back in cf49ccd0 (Clang 8),
probably before the feature-test macro had been settled on.
`__cpp_lib_string_resize_and_overwrite` will be added by D113013 so I didn't add it here.
Fixes#46605.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116433
For example, `std::ranges::range<Holder<Incomplete>*>` should be
well-formed false, not a hard error at compile time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116239
The big change here is that they now work as intended for rvalues,
e.g. `ranges::cbegin(std::string_view("hello"))`.
Also, add tests verifying their return types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116199
If `__first == __middle`, then `partial_sort` is a no-op; don't
bother to iterate all the way from `__middle` to `__end`.
Fixes#49431.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116296
Some headers which require the version header depend on other headers to
provide it. Include the version header in all top-level headers to make
sure a header cleanup can't remove the version header.
Note this doesn't add the version header to the c headers.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116172
Use the zx_cprng_draw system call directly rather than going
through the libc getentropy function. The libc function is a
trivial wrapper around the system call, and is not a standard C
function. Avoiding it reduces the Fuchsia libc ABI surface that
libc++ depends on.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116498
We didn't support noop_coroutine for GCC in previous conforming patch.
So that GCC couldn't use noop_coroutine() defined in <coroutine>. And
after this patch, GCC should be able to compile the whole <coroutine>
header.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116144
It was missing the cast to `bool` in `bool(__t.empty())`.
It was wrongly using `std::forward` in some places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115312
During the review of D115991 @vitaut pointed out the enum shouldn't
depend on whether or not _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INT128 is defined. The current
implementation lets the enum's ABI depend on this configuration option
without a good cause.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116120
These headers have stabilized; we don't expect anyone to be
blindly clang-formatting them anymore.
Leave the comments in `__format/*.h` for Mark to remove at his leisure.
Clang is gaining `auto(x)` support in D113393; sadly there
seems to be no feature-test macro for it. Zhihao is opening
a core issue for that macro.
Use `_LIBCPP_AUTO_CAST` where C++20 specifies we should use `auto(x)`;
stop using `__decay_copy(x)` in those places.
In fact, remove `__decay_copy` entirely. As of C++20, it's purely
a paper specification tool signifying "Return just `x`, but it was
perfect-forwarded, so we understand you're going to have to call
its move-constructor sometimes." I believe there's no reason we'd
ever need to do its operation explicitly in code.
This heisenbugs away a test failure on MinGW; see D112214.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115686
As discussed with ldionne. The problem with this static_assert
is that it makes ranges::begin a pitfall for anyone ever to use
inside a constraint or decltype. Many Ranges things, such as ranges::size,
are specified as "Does X if X is well-formed, or else Y if Y is well-formed,
or else `ranges::end(t) - ranges::begin(t)` if that is well-formed, or else..."
And if there's a static_assert hidden inside `ranges::begin(t)`, then you get
a hard error as soon as you ask the question -- even if the answer would have
been "no, that's not well-formed"!
Constraining on `requires { t + 0; }` or `requires { t + N; }` is verboten
because of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103700 . For ranges::begin,
we can just decay to a pointer even in the incomplete-type case. For ranges::end,
we can safely constrain on `sizeof(*t)`. Yes, this means that an array of incomplete
type has a `ranges::begin` but no `ranges::end`... just like an unbounded array of
complete type. This is a valid manifestation of IFNDR.
All of the new libcxx/test/std/ cases are mandatory behavior, as far as I'm aware.
Tests for the IFNDR cases in ranges::begin and ranges::end remain in `libcxx/test/libcxx/`.
The similar tests for ranges::empty and ranges::data were simply wrong, AFAIK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115838
Arthur O'Dwyer