The most common (non-buggy) case are where such objects are used as
return expressions in bool-returning functions or as boolean function
arguments. In those cases I've used (& added if necessary) a named
function to provide the equivalent (or sometimes negative, depending on
convenient wording) test.
DiagnosticBuilder kept its implicit conversion operator owing to the
prevalent use of it in return statements.
One bug was found in ExprConstant.cpp involving a comparison of two
PointerUnions (PointerUnion did not previously have an operator==, so
instead both operands were converted to bool & then compared). A test
is included in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp for the fix
(adding operator== to PointerUnion in LLVM).
llvm-svn: 181869
This is similar to how we divide up the StaticAnalyzer libraries to separate
core functionality to what is clearly associated with Frontend actions.
llvm-svn: 163050
isWritten() returns false, if shouldVisitImplicitCode() returns true.
Previously those CXXCtorInitializers were always skipped.
In order to make this change easier to test, this patch also extends the
test class template ExpectedLocationVisitor to support arbitrary numbers
of expected matches and disallowed matches.
llvm-svn: 162544
ASTMatchers have the same name as the corresponding AST nodes
but are lower case. The only exceptions are the "CXX" prefixes
which are not copied over to the matcher names as the goal is to
actually remove these prefixes from the AST node names.
llvm-svn: 162536
used with classes that generate ASTConsumers; this allows decoupling
the ASTConsumer generation from the Frontend library (like, for example,
the MatchFinder in the upcoming ASTMatcher patch).
llvm-svn: 159760
The fundamental change is to put a CMakeLists.txt file in the unittest
directory, with a single test binary produced from it. This has several
advantages.
Among other fundamental advantages, we start to get the checking logic
for when a file is missing from the CMake build, and this caught one
missing file already! More fun details in the LLVM commit corresponding
to this one.
Note that the LLVM commit and this one most both be applied, or neither.
Sorry for any skew issues.
llvm-svn: 158910
That commit added a new library just to hold the RawCommentList. I've
started a discussion on the commit thread about whether that is really
meritted -- it certainly doesn't seem necessary at this stage.
However, the immediate problem is that the AST library has a hard
dependency on the Comment library, but the dependencies were set up
completely backward. In addition to the layering violation, this had an
unfortunate effect if scattering the Comments library dependency
throughout the build system, but inconsistently so -- several parts of
the CMake dependencies were missing and only showed up due to transitive
deps or the fact that the target wasn't being built by tho bots.
It turns out that the Comments library can't (currently) be a well
formed layer *below* the AST library either, as it has an API that
accepts an ASTContext. That parameter is currently unused, so maybe that
was a mistake?
Anyways, it really seems like this is logically part of the AST --
that's the whole point of the ASTContext providing access to it as far
as I can tell -- so I've merged it into the AST library to solve the
immediate layering violation problems and remove some of the churn from
our library dependencies.
llvm-svn: 158807
* Retain comments in the AST
* Serialize/deserialize comments
* Find comments attached to a certain Decl
* Expose raw comment text and SourceRange via libclang
llvm-svn: 158771
Fix RecursiveASTVisitor to visit CXXForRangeStmts accordingly to visit
implicit or explicit code.
The key bug that inspired this was the Visitor not visiting the range
initializer of such a loop, which is explicit code.
llvm-svn: 158395
David Blaikie