This patch fixes the non-determinism caused due to iterating SmallPtrSet's
which was uncovered due to the experimental "reverse iteration order " patch:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26718
The following unit tests failed because of the undefined order of iteration.
LLVM :: Transforms/Util/MemorySSA/cyclicphi.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/Util/MemorySSA/many-dom-backedge.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/Util/MemorySSA/many-doms.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/Util/MemorySSA/phi-translation.ll
Reviewers: dberlin, mgrang
Subscribers: dberlin, llvm-commits, david2050
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26704
llvm-svn: 287563
This patch updates MemorySSA's use-optimizing walker to be more
accurate and, in some cases, faster.
Essentially, this changed our core walking algorithm from a
cache-as-you-go DFS to an iteratively expanded DFS, with all of the
caching happening at the end. Said expansion happens when we hit a Phi,
P; we'll try to do the smallest amount of work possible to see if
optimizing above that Phi is legal in the first place. If so, we'll
expand the search to see if we can optimize to the next phi, etc.
An iteratively expanded DFS lets us potentially quit earlier (because we
don't assume that we can optimize above all phis) than our old walker.
Additionally, because we don't cache as we go, we can now optimize above
loops.
As an added bonus, this patch adds a ton of verification (if
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS are enabled), so finding bugs is easier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21777
llvm-svn: 275940
Add support for the new pass manager to MemorySSA pass.
Change MemorySSA to be computed eagerly upon construction.
Change MemorySSAWalker to be owned by the MemorySSA object that creates
it.
Reviewers: dberlin, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19664
llvm-svn: 271432
This patch teaches the caching MemorySSA walker a few things:
1. Not to walk Phis we've walked before. It seems that we tried to do
this before, but it didn't work so well in cases like:
define void @foo() {
%1 = alloca i8
%2 = alloca i8
br label %begin
begin:
; 3 = MemoryPhi({%0,liveOnEntry},{%end,2})
; 1 = MemoryDef(3)
store i8 0, i8* %2
br label %end
end:
; MemoryUse(?)
load i8, i8* %1
; 2 = MemoryDef(1)
store i8 0, i8* %2
br label %begin
}
Because we wouldn't put Phis in Q.Visited until we tried to visit them.
So, when trying to optimize MemoryUse(?):
- We would visit 3 above
- ...Which would make us put {%0,liveOnEntry} in Q.Visited
- ...Which would make us visit {%0,liveOnEntry}
- ...Which would make us put {%end,2} in Q.Visited
- ...Which would make us visit {%end,2}
- ...Which would make us visit 3
- ...Which would realize we've already visited everything in 3
- ...Which would make us conservatively return 3.
In the added test-case, (@looped_visitedonlyonce) this behavior would
cause us to give incorrect results. Specifically, we'd visit 4 twice
in the same query, but on the second visit, we'd skip while.cond because
it had been visited, visit if.then/if.then2, and cache "1" as the
clobbering def on the way back.
2. If we try to walk the defs of a {Phi,MemLoc} and see it has been
visited before, just hand back the Phi we're trying to optimize.
I promise this isn't as terrible as it seems. :)
We now insert {Phi,MemLoc} pairs just before walking the Phi's upward
defs. So, we check the cache for the {Phi,MemLoc} pair before checking
if we've already walked the Phi.
The {Phi,MemLoc} pair is (almost?) always guaranteed to have a cache
entry if we've already fully walked it, because we cache as we go.
So, if the {Phi,MemLoc} pair isn't in cache, either:
(a) we must be in the process of visiting it (in which case, we can't
give a better answer in a cache-as-we-go DFS walker)
(b) we visited it, but didn't cache it on the way back (...which seems
to require `ModifyingAccess` to not dominate `StartingAccess`,
so I'm 99% sure that would be an error. If it's not an error, I
haven't been able to get it to happen locally, so I suspect it's
rare.)
- - - - -
As a consequence of this change, we no longer skip upward defs of phis,
so we can kill the `VisitedOnlyOne` check. This gives us better accuracy
than we had before, at the cost of potentially doing a bit more work
when we have a loop.
llvm-svn: 264814
There are a few bugs in the walker that this patch addresses.
Primarily:
- Caching can break when we have multiple BBs without phis
- We weren't optimizing some phis properly
- Because of how the DFS iterator works, there were times where we
wouldn't cache any results of our DFS
I left the test cases with FIXMEs in, because I'm not sure how much
effort it will take to get those to work (read: We'll probably
ultimately have to end up redoing the walker, or we'll have to come up
with some creative caching tricks), and more test coverage = better.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18065
llvm-svn: 264180
Please see include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/MemorySSA.h for a description
of MemorySSA, and what it does.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7864
llvm-svn: 259595
Mandeep Singh Grang