The checker was trying to analyze the body of every method in Objective-C
@implementation clause but the sythesized accessor stubs that were introduced
into it by 2073dd2d have no bodies.
While analyzing code `memcmp(a, NULL, n);', where `a' has an unconstrained
symbolic value, the analyzer was emitting a warning about the *first* argument
being a null pointer, even though we'd rather have it warn about the *second*
argument.
This happens because CStringChecker first checks whether the two argument
buffers are in fact the same buffer, in order to take the fast path.
This boils down to assuming `a == NULL' to true. Then the subsequent check
for null pointer argument "discovers" that `a' is null.
Don't take the fast path unless we are *sure* that the buffers are the same.
Otherwise proceed as normal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71322
Fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44236. This code was
originally introduced in rG36512330041201e10f5429361bbd79b1afac1ea1.
However, the attribute copying was done in the wrong place (in general
call replacement, not thunk generation) and a proper fix was
implemented in D12581.
Previously this code was just unnecessary but harmless (because
FunctionComparator ensured that the attributes of the two functions
are exactly the same), but since byval was changed to accept a type
this copying is actively wrong and may result in malformed IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71173
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets
to show the problem more generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some
value is free to negate, but that use count can change as we
rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression(). So something
that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation
phase becomes not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or
the inverse - something that was not free becomes free).
This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that
everything in an expression that is negatible to be handled
in the corresponding code within getNegatedExpression().
This patch skips the use check during the rewrite phase.
So we determine that some expression isNegatibleForFree
(identically to without this patch), but during the rewrite,
don't rely on use counts to decide how to create the optimal
expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
directive.
Fixed capturing of the if condition if no modifer was specified in this
condition. Previously could capture it only in outer region and it could
lead to a compiler crash.
When writing out a profile, avoid allocating a page on the stack for the
purpose of writing out zeroes, as some embedded environments do not have
enough stack space to accomodate this.
Instead, use a small, fixed-size zero buffer that can be written
repeatedly.
For a synthetic file with >100,000 functions, I did not measure a
significant difference in profile write times. We are removing a
page-length zero-fill `memset()` in favor of several smaller buffered
`fwrite()` calls: in practice, I am not sure there is much of a
difference. The performance impact is only expected to affect the
continuous sync mode (%c) -- zero padding is less than 8 bytes in all
other cases.
rdar://57810014
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71323
According to OpenMP 5.0, if clause can be used in for simd directive. If
condition in the if clause if false, the non-vectorized version of the
loop must be executed.
This is a half-implemented feature that as far as we can tell was
never used by anything since its original inclusion in 2014. This
patch removes it to make remaining the code easier to understand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71310
Summary:
The current da printer shows the dependence without indicating
which instructions are being considered as the src vs dst. It
also silently ignores call instructions, despite the fact that
they create confused dependence edges to other memory
instructions. This patch addresses these two issues plus a
couple of minor non-functional improvements.
Authored By: bmahjour
Reviewer: dmgreen, fhahn, philip.pfaffe, chandlerc
Reviewed By: dmgreen, fhahn
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71088
AMDGPU was the last in tree target to use this tablegen mode. I plan to
split up the global intrinsic enum similar to the way that clang
diagnostics are split up today. I don't plan to build on this mode.
Reviewers: arsenm, echristo, efriedma
Reviewed By: echristo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71318
Before z14, we did not have any FMA instruction for 128-bit
floating-point, so the @llvm.fma.f128 intrinsic needs to be
expanded to a libcall on those platforms.
This worked correctly for regular FMA, but was implemented
incorrectly for the strict version. This was not noticed
because we did not have test coverage for this case.
This patch fixes that incorrect expansion and adds the
missing test cases.
Summary:
This patch adds a method to determine if a loop is in rotated form (the latch is
an exiting block). It also modifies the getLoopGuardBranch method to use this
new method. This method can also be used in Loopfusion. Once this patch lands I
will make the corresponding changes there.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, Meinersbur, dmgreen, etiotto, Whitney, fhahn, hfinkel
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65958
This simplifies code where no extra details are required
Also don't write out detail when it is empty.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71347
There are a few places that check specific string attributes have
particular values, and assert if they are something else. The verifier
should catch these kinds of cases.
Sometimes the return value of a comparison operator call is
`UnkownVal`. Since no assumptions can be made on `UnknownVal`,
this leeds to keeping impossible execution paths in the
exploded graph resulting in poor performance and false
positives. To overcome this we replace unknown results of
iterator comparisons by conjured symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70244
On some edge cases such as Chromium compiled with full instrumentation we
have a .text section over twice the size of the maximum branch range and
the instrumented code generation containing many examples of the erratum
sequence. The combination of Thunks and many erratum sequences causes
finalizeAddressDependentContent() to not converge. We end up with:
start
- Thunk Creation (disturbs addresses after thunks, creating more patches)
- Patch Creation (disturbs addresses after patches, creating more thunks)
- goto start
In most images with few thunks and patches the mutual disturbance does not
cause convergence problems. As the .text size and number of patches go up
the risk increases.
A way to prevent the thunk creation from interfering with patch creation is
to round up the size of the thunks to a 4KiB boundary when the
erratum patch is enabled. As the erratum sequence only triggers when an
instruction sequence starts at 0xff8 or 0xffc modulo (4 KiB) by making the
thunks not affect addresses modulo (4 KiB) we prevent thunks from
interfering with the patch.
The patches themselves could be aggregated in the same way that Thunks are
within ThunkSections and we could round up the size in the same way. This
would reduce the number of patches created in a .text section size >
128 MiB but would not likely help convergence problems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71281
fixes (remaining part of) pr44071, other part in D71242
The code to insert patch section merges them with a comparison function that
uses logic of the form:
return (isa<PatchSection>(a) && !isa<PatchSection>(b));
If the PatchSections don't implement classof this check fails if b is also
a SyntheticSection. This can result in the patches being out of range if
the SyntheticSection is big, for example a ThunkSection with lots of thunks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71242
fixes (part of) pr44071
HasMetadata checks if our metadata map knows the given object. GetMetadata
also does this check and then does another search to actually retrieve
the value. This can all just be one lookup.
In some cases, we can rename a store operand, in order to enable pairing
of stores. For store pairs, that cannot be merged because the first
tored register is defined in between the second store, we try to find
suitable rename register.
First, we check if we can rename the given register:
1. The first store register must be killed at the store, which means we
do not have to rename instructions after the first store.
2. We scan backwards from the first store, to find the definition of the
stored register and check all uses in between are renamable. Along
they way, we collect the minimal register classes of the uses for
overlapping (sub/super)registers.
Second, we try to find an available register from the minimal physical
register class of the original register. A suitable register must not be
1. defined before FirstMI
2. between the previous definition of the register to rename
3. a callee saved register.
We use KILL flags to clear defined registers while scanning from the
beginning to the end of the block.
This triggers quite often, here are the top changes for MultiSource,
SPEC2000, SPEC2006 compiled with -O3 for iOS:
Metric: aarch64-ldst-opt.NumPairCreated
Program base patch diff
test-suite...nch/fourinarow/fourinarow.test 2.00 39.00 1850.0%
test-suite...s/ASC_Sequoia/IRSmk/IRSmk.test 46.00 80.00 73.9%
test-suite...chmarks/Olden/power/power.test 70.00 96.00 37.1%
test-suite...cations/hexxagon/hexxagon.test 29.00 39.00 34.5%
test-suite...nchmarks/McCat/05-eks/eks.test 100.00 132.00 32.0%
test-suite.../Trimaran/enc-rc4/enc-rc4.test 46.00 59.00 28.3%
test-suite...T2006/473.astar/473.astar.test 160.00 200.00 25.0%
test-suite.../Trimaran/enc-md5/enc-md5.test 8.00 10.00 25.0%
test-suite...telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm.test 113.00 139.00 23.0%
test-suite...ediabench/gsm/toast/toast.test 113.00 139.00 23.0%
test-suite...Source/Benchmarks/sim/sim.test 91.00 111.00 22.0%
test-suite...C/CFP2000/179.art/179.art.test 41.00 49.00 19.5%
test-suite...peg2/mpeg2dec/mpeg2decode.test 245.00 279.00 13.9%
test-suite...marks/Olden/health/health.test 16.00 18.00 12.5%
test-suite...ks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl.test 90.00 101.00 12.2%
test-suite...fice-ispell/office-ispell.test 91.00 100.00 9.9%
test-suite...oxyApps-C/miniGMG/miniGMG.test 430.00 465.00 8.1%
test-suite...lowfish/security-blowfish.test 39.00 42.00 7.7%
test-suite.../Applications/spiff/spiff.test 42.00 45.00 7.1%
test-suite...arks/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 2473.00 2646.00 7.0%
test-suite.../VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes.test 29.00 31.00 6.9%
test-suite...nch/beamformer/beamformer.test 220.00 235.00 6.8%
test-suite...CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa.test 2110.00 2252.00 6.7%
test-suite...ve-susan/automotive-susan.test 109.00 116.00 6.4%
test-suite...s-C/unix-smail/unix-smail.test 65.00 69.00 6.2%
test-suite...CI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.test 1194.00 1265.00 5.9%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/nbench/nbench.test 472.00 500.00 5.9%
test-suite...oxyApps-C/miniAMR/miniAMR.test 248.00 262.00 5.6%
test-suite...quoia/CrystalMk/CrystalMk.test 18.00 19.00 5.6%
test-suite...rks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4.test 7331.00 7710.00 5.2%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.test 5651.00 5938.00 5.1%
test-suite...ternal/HMMER/hmmcalibrate.test 750.00 788.00 5.1%
test-suite...T2006/456.hmmer/456.hmmer.test 764.00 802.00 5.0%
test-suite...ications/JM/ldecod/ldecod.test 1028.00 1079.00 5.0%
test-suite...CFP2006/444.namd/444.namd.test 1368.00 1434.00 4.8%
test-suite...marks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 4471.00 4685.00 4.8%
test-suite...6/464.h264ref/464.h264ref.test 3122.00 3271.00 4.8%
test-suite...pplications/oggenc/oggenc.test 1497.00 1565.00 4.5%
test-suite...T2000/300.twolf/300.twolf.test 742.00 774.00 4.3%
test-suite.../Prolangs-C/loader/loader.test 24.00 25.00 4.2%
test-suite...0.perlbench/400.perlbench.test 1983.00 2058.00 3.8%
test-suite...ications/JM/lencod/lencod.test 4612.00 4785.00 3.8%
test-suite...yApps-C++/PENNANT/PENNANT.test 995.00 1032.00 3.7%
test-suite...arks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms.test 54.00 56.00 3.7%
Reviewers: efriedma, thegameg, samparker, dmgreen, paquette, evandro
Reviewed By: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70450
A number of the --debug-* options in llvm-dwarfdump are not particularly
well tested. In some cases, the option is only tested as part of testing
another feature, or a specific part of the section that the options
dump. This change adds four new tests to address some of these holes. It
is not aiming to address every hole however.
I kept the --debug-line switch test separate to X86/brief.s because the
latter only considers the parts of the line table that are affected by
verbose printing, thus missing out things like the header and different
values for things like the Line, Column etc registers.
Reviewed by: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71276
The Isa register is a uint8_t, but at least on Windows this is
internally an unsigned char, which meant that prior to this patch it got
formatted as an ASCII character, rather than a decimal number. This
patch fixes this by casting it to a uint64_t before printing. I did it
this way instead of using a uint8_t formatter because a) it is simpler,
and b) it allows us to change the internal type of Isa in the future
without this code breaking.
I also took the opportunity to test the printing of the other standard
opcodes.
Reviewed by: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71274
Summary: Rollback of parts of D71213. After digging more into the code I think we should leave 0 when creating the instructions (CreateMemcpy, CreateMaskedStore, CreateMaskedLoad). It's probably fine for MemorySanitizer because Alignement is resolved but I'm having a hard time convincing myself it has no impact at all (although tests are passing).
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71332
Debugging the Iterator Modeling checker or any of the iterator checkers
is difficult without being able to see the relations between the
iterator variables and their abstract positions, as well as the abstract
symbols denoting the begin and the end of the container.
This patch adds the checker-specific part of the Program State printing
to the Iterator Modeling checker.
Summary:
Add host predefined macros to compilation for SYCL device, which is
required for pre-processing host specific includes (e.g. system
headers).
Reviewers: ABataev, jdoerfert
Subscribers: ebevhan, Anastasia, cfe-commits, keryell, Naghasan, Fznamznon
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71286
Signed-off-by: Alexey Bader <alexey.bader@intel.com>
Summary:
Attribute annotations are recorded in a special global composite variable
that points to annotation strings and the annotated objects.
As a restriction of the LLVM IR type system, those pointers are all
pointers to address space 0, so let's insert an addrspacecast when the
annotated global is in a non-0 address space.
Since this addrspacecast is only reachable from the global annotations
object, this should allow us to represent annotations on all globals
regardless of which addrspacecasts are usually legal for the target.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71208
Danila Kutenin