Summary:
Paying off some technical debt in VectorOps, where I introduced a special
op for a fused accumulator into reduction to avoid some issues around
printing and parsing an optional accumulator. This CL merges the two
into one op again and does things the right way (still would be nice
to have "assemblyFormat" for optional operands though....).
Reviewers: nicolasvasilache, andydavis1, ftynse, rriddle
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, liufengdb, Joonsoo, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75699
Summary:
This revision removes all of the functionality related to successor operands on the core Operation class. This greatly simplifies a lot of handling of operands, as well as successors. For example, DialectConversion no longer needs a special "matchAndRewrite" for branching terminator operations.(Note, the existing method was also broken for operations with variadic successors!!)
This also enables terminator operations to define their own relationships with successor arguments, instead of the hardcoded "pass-through" behavior that exists today.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75318
This greatly simplifies the requirements for builders using this mechanism for managing variadic operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75317
The existing API for successor operands on operations is in the process of being removed. This revision simplifies a later one that completely removes the existing API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75316
This attribute details the segment sizes for operand groups within the operation. This revision add support for automatically populating this attribute in the declarative parser.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75315
This interface contains the necessary components to provide the same builtin behavior that terminators have. This will be used in future revisions to remove many of the hardcoded constraints placed on successors and successor operands. The interface initially contains three methods:
```c++
// Return a set of values corresponding to the operands for successor 'index', or None if the operands do not correspond to materialized values.
Optional<OperandRange> getSuccessorOperands(unsigned index);
// Return true if this terminator can have it's successor operands erased.
bool canEraseSuccessorOperand();
// Erase the operand of a successor. This is only valid to call if 'canEraseSuccessorOperand' returns true.
void eraseSuccessorOperand(unsigned succIdx, unsigned opIdx);
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75314
This allows for simplifying OpDefGen, as well providing specializing accessors for the different successor counts. This mirrors the existing traits for operands and results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75313
The current setup of the GPU dialect is to model both the host and
device side codegen. For cases (like IREE) the host side modeling
might not directly fit its use case, but device-side codegen is still
valuable. First step in accessing just the device-side functionality
of the GPU dialect is to allow just creating a gpu.func operation from
a gpu.launch operation. In addition this change also "inlines"
operations into the gpu.func op at time of creation instead of this
being a later step.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75287
Summary:
This patch adds support for translation of the OpenMP barrier construct to LLVM
IR. The OpenMP IRBuilder is used for this translation. In this patch the code
for translation is added to the existing LLVM dialect translation to LLVM IR.
The patch includes code changes and a testcase.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, nicolasvasilache, ftynse, rriddle, mehdi_amini
Reviewed By: ftynse, rriddle, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72962
output has zero rank.
While lowering to loops, no indices should be used in the load/store
operation if the buffer is zero-rank.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75391
This commit updates SPIR-V dialect to support integer signedness
by relaxing various checks for signless to just normal integers.
The hack for spv.Bitcast can now be removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75611
Summary:
The order of the operations has fallen out of sync as operations have been renamed and new ones have been added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75540
Recently introduced support for converting sequential reduction loops to
CFG of basic blocks in the Standard dialect makes it possible to perform
a staged conversion of parallel reduction loops into a similar CFG by
using sequential loops as an intermediate step. This is already the case
for parallel loops without reduction, so extend the pattern to support
an additional use case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75599
Summary: This allows for attaching the attribute to CmpF as a proper argument, and thus enables the removal of a bunch of c++ code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75539
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components.
Previous version of this patch broke depencies on TableGen
targets. This appears to be because it compiled all
libraries to OBJECT libraries (probably because cmake
is generating different target names). Avoiding object
libraries results in correct dependencies.
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
add_llvm_library and add_llvm_executable may need to create new targets with
appropriate dependencies. As a result, it is not sufficient in some
configurations (namely LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on) to only call
add_dependencies(). Instead, the explicit TableGen dependencies must
be passed to add_llvm_library() or add_llvm_executable() using the DEPENDS
keyword.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74930
In cmake, it is redundant to have a target list under target_link_libraries()
and add_dependency(). This patch removes the redundant dependency from
add_dependency().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74929
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
add_llvm_library and add_llvm_executable may need to create new targets with
appropriate dependencies. As a result, it is not sufficient in some
configurations (namely LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on) to only call
add_dependencies(). Instead, the explicit TableGen dependencies must
be passed to add_llvm_library() or add_llvm_executable() using the DEPENDS
keyword.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74930
In cmake, it is redundant to have a target list under target_link_libraries()
and add_dependency(). This patch removes the redundant dependency from
add_dependency().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74929
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
Instead of creating extra libraries we don't really need, collect a
list of all dialects and use that instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75221
This matches loops with a affine.min upper bound, limiting the trip
count to a constant, and rewrites them into two loops, one with constant
upper bound and one with variable upper bound. The assumption is that
the constant upper bound loop will be unrolled and vectorized, which is
preferable if this is the hot path.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75240
Summary:
This change does not add any functionality but merely exposes existing
static functions to make the associated transformations available
outside of their testing passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75232
Summary:
AffineApplyNormalizer provides common logic for folding affine maps that appear
in affine.apply into other affine operations that use the result of said
affine.apply. In the process, affine maps of both operations are composed.
During the composition `A.compose(B)` the symbols from the map A are placed
before those of the map B in a single concatenated symbol list. However,
AffineApplyNormalizer was ordering the operands of the operation being
normalized by iteratively appending the symbols into a single list accoridng to
the operand order, regardless of whether these operands are symbols of the
current operation or of the map that is being folded into it. This could lead
to wrong order of symbols and, when the symbols were bound to constant values,
to visibly incorrect folding of constants into affine maps as reported in
PR45031. Make sure symbols operands to the current operation are always placed
before symbols coming from the folded maps.
Update the test that was exercising the incorrect folder behavior. For some
reason, the order of symbol operands was swapped in the test input compared to
the previous operations, making it easy to assume the correct maps were
produced whereas they were swapping the symbols back due to the problem
described above.
Closes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45031
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75247
This commit handles folding spv.LogicalAnd/spv.LogicalOr when
one of the operands is constant true/false.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75195
This revision performs some basic refactoring towards more easily defining Linalg "named" ops. Such named ops form the backbone of operations that are ubiquitous in the ML application domain.
Affine dialect already has a map+operand simplification infrastructure in
place. Plug the recently added affine.min/max operations into this
infrastructure and add a simple test. More complex behavior of the simplifier
is already tested by other ops.
Addresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45008.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75058
aartbik