After recent improvements which makes better use of LOC instead of IPM, the
TTI cost functions also needs to be updated to reflect this.
This involves sext, zext and xor of i1.
The tests were updated so that for z13 the new costs are expected, while the
old costs are still checked for on zEC12.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51339
llvm-svn: 342207
a generically extensible collection of extra info attached to
a `MachineInstr`.
The primary change here is cleaning up the APIs used for setting and
manipulating the `MachineMemOperand` pointer arrays so chat we can
change how they are allocated.
Then we introduce an extra info object that using the trailing object
pattern to attach some number of MMOs but also other extra info. The
design of this is specifically so that this extra info has a fixed
necessary cost (the header tracking what extra info is included) and
everything else can be tail allocated. This pattern works especially
well with a `BumpPtrAllocator` which we use here.
I've also added the basic scaffolding for putting interesting pointers
into this, namely pre- and post-instruction symbols. These aren't used
anywhere yet, they're just there to ensure I've actually gotten the data
structure types correct. I'll flesh out support for these in
a subsequent patch (MIR dumping, parsing, the works).
Finally, I've included an optimization where we store any single pointer
inline in the `MachineInstr` to avoid the allocation overhead. This is
expected to be the overwhelmingly most common case and so should avoid
any memory usage growth due to slightly less clever / dense allocation
when dealing with >1 MMO. This did require several ergonomic
improvements to the `PointerSumType` to reasonably support the various
usage models.
This also has a side effect of freeing up 8 bits within the
`MachineInstr` which could be repurposed for something else.
The suggested direction here came largely from Hal Finkel. I hope it was
worth it. ;] It does hopefully clear a path for subsequent extensions
w/o nearly as much leg work. Lots of thanks to Reid and Justin for
careful reviews and ideas about how to do all of this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50701
llvm-svn: 339940
Change
subreg_r32 -> subreg_h32
subreg_r64 -> subreg_h64
subreg_hr32 -> subreg_hh32
The subregisters subreg_r32 and subreg_r64 were added to emphasize the
fact that modifying these subregisters may clobber the entire register.
This is not necessarily the case for subreg_h32, et al.
However, the ability to compose subreg_h64 with subreg_r32, and with
subreg_h32 and subreg_l32 at the same time makes the compositions be
treated as non-overlapping (leading to problems when tracking subreg
liveness). See D50468 for more details.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50725
llvm-svn: 339778
This option is needed to enable subreg liveness tracking during register
allocation.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50779
llvm-svn: 339776
`MachineMemOperand` pointers attached to `MachineSDNodes` and instead
have the `SelectionDAG` fully manage the memory for this array.
Prior to this change, the memory management was deeply confusing here --
The way the MI was built relied on the `SelectionDAG` allocating memory
for these arrays of pointers using the `MachineFunction`'s allocator so
that the raw pointer to the array could be blindly copied into an
eventual `MachineInstr`. This creates a hard coupling between how
`MachineInstr`s allocate their array of `MachineMemOperand` pointers and
how the `MachineSDNode` does.
This change is motivated in large part by a change I am making to how
`MachineFunction` allocates these pointers, but it seems like a layering
improvement as well.
This would run the risk of increasing allocations overall, but I've
implemented an optimization that should avoid that by storing a single
`MachineMemOperand` pointer directly instead of allocating anything.
This is expected to be a net win because the vast majority of uses of
these only need a single pointer.
As a side-effect, this makes the API for updating a `MachineSDNode` and
a `MachineInstr` reasonably different which seems nice to avoid
unexpected coupling of these two layers. We can map between them, but we
shouldn't be *surprised* at where that occurs. =]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50680
llvm-svn: 339740
Remove the redundant check against zero when updating ProcResourceCounters in
nextGroup(), as pointed out in https://reviews.llvm.org/D50187.
Review: Ulrich Weigand.
llvm-svn: 339139
Some instructions expand to more than one decoder group.
This has been hitherto ignored, but is handled with this patch.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50187
llvm-svn: 338849
The DAG combiner logic to simplify AND masks in shift counts is invalid.
While it is true that the SystemZ shift instructions ignore all but the
low 6 bits of the shift count, it is still invalid to simplify the AND
masks while the DAG still uses the standard shift operators (which are
*not* defined to match the SystemZ instruction behavior).
Instead, this patch performs equivalent operations during instruction
selection. For completely removing the AND, this now happens via
additional DAG match patterns implemented by a multi-alternative
PatFrags. For simplifying a 32-bit AND to a 16-bit AND, the existing DAG
patterns were already mostly OK, they just needed an output XForm to
actually truncate the immediate value.
Unfortunately, the latter change also exposed a bug in TableGen: it
seems XForms are currently only handled correctly for direct operands of
the outermost operation node. This patch also fixes that bug by simply
recurring through the whole pattern. This should be NFC for all other
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50096
llvm-svn: 338521
Since z13, the max group size will be 2 if any μop has more than 3 register
sources.
This has been ignored sofar in the SystemZHazardRecognizer, but is now
handled by recognizing those instructions and adjusting the tracking of
decoding and the cost heuristic for grouping.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49847
llvm-svn: 338368
NFC changes to make scheduler TableGen files more readable, by using loops
instead of a lot of similar defs with just e.g. a latency value that changes.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49598
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Javed Abshar
llvm-svn: 337909
Two minor issues: The new MCD SchedWrite name does not contain "Unit" like
all the others, so a check is needed. Also, print "LSU" instead of "LS".
Review: Ulrich Weigand
llvm-svn: 337700
As a consequence of recent discussions
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123164.html), this patch
changes the SystemZ SchedModels so that the IssueWidth is 6, which is the
decoder capacity, and NumMicroOps become the number of decoder slots needed
per instruction.
In addition, the SchedWrite latencies now match the MachineInstructions
def-operand indexes, and ReadAdvances have been added on instructions with
one register operand and one memory operand.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D47008
llvm-svn: 337538
If we are only extracting vector elements via EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT(s) we may be able to use SimplifyDemandedVectorElts to avoid unnecessary vector ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49262
llvm-svn: 337258
A TableGen instruction record usually contains a DAG pattern that will
describe the SelectionDAG operation that can be implemented by this
instruction. However, there will be cases where several different DAG
patterns can all be implemented by the same instruction. The way to
represent this today is to write additional patterns in the Pattern
(or usually Pat) class that map those extra DAG patterns to the
instruction. This usually also works fine.
However, I've noticed cases where the current setup seems to require
quite a bit of extra (and duplicated) text in the target .td files.
For example, in the SystemZ back-end, there are quite a number of
instructions that can implement an "add-with-overflow" operation.
The same instructions also need to be used to implement just plain
addition (simply ignoring the extra overflow output). The current
solution requires creating extra Pat pattern for every instruction,
duplicating the information about which particular add operands
map best to which particular instruction.
This patch enhances TableGen to support a new PatFrags class, which
can be used to encapsulate multiple alternative patterns that may
all match to the same instruction. It operates the same way as the
existing PatFrag class, except that it accepts a list of DAG patterns
to match instead of just a single one. As an example, we can now define
a PatFrags to match either an "add-with-overflow" or a regular add
operation:
def z_sadd : PatFrags<(ops node:$src1, node:$src2),
[(z_saddo node:$src1, node:$src2),
(add node:$src1, node:$src2)]>;
and then use this in the add instruction pattern:
defm AR : BinaryRRAndK<"ar", 0x1A, 0xB9F8, z_sadd, GR32, GR32>;
These SystemZ target changes are implemented here as well.
Note that PatFrag is now defined as a subclass of PatFrags, which
means that some users of internals of PatFrag need to be updated.
(E.g. instead of using PatFrag.Fragment you now need to use
!head(PatFrag.Fragments).)
The implementation is based on the following main ideas:
- InlinePatternFragments may now replace each original pattern
with several result patterns, not just one.
- parseInstructionPattern delays calling InlinePatternFragments
and InferAllTypes. Instead, it extracts a single DAG match
pattern from the main instruction pattern.
- Processing of the DAG match pattern part of the main instruction
pattern now shares most code with processing match patterns from
the Pattern class.
- Direct use of main instruction patterns in InferFromPattern and
EmitResultInstructionAsOperand is removed; everything now operates
solely on DAG match patterns.
Reviewed by: hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48545
llvm-svn: 336999
This is needed to get CC operand in right place, as expected by the
SchedModel.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D47820
llvm-svn: 334161
On targets like Arm some relaxations may only be performed when certain
architectural features are available. As functions can be compiled with
differing levels of architectural support we must make a judgement on
whether we can relax based on the MCSubtargetInfo for the function. This
change passes through the MCSubtargetInfo for the function to
fixupNeedsRelaxation so that the decision on whether to relax can be made
per function. In this patch, only the ARM backend makes use of this
information. We must also pass the MCSubtargetInfo to applyFixup because
some fixups skip error checking on the assumption that relaxation has
occurred, to prevent code-generation errors applyFixup must see the same
MCSubtargetInfo as fixupNeedsRelaxation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44928
llvm-svn: 334078
With this we gain a little flexibility in how the generic object
writer is created.
Part of PR37466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47045
llvm-svn: 332868
To make this work I needed to add an endianness field to MCAsmBackend
so that writeNopData() implementations know which endianness to use.
Part of PR37466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47035
llvm-svn: 332857
Sorry, the commit comment for r332703 is completely broken.
My mind slipped - the right description would be:
In SystemZDAGToDAGISel::Select(), in the handling for SELECT_CCMASK:
Check if UpdateNodeOperands() returns a different SDNode and in that
case call ReplaceNode.
Review: Ulrich Weigand.
llvm-svn: 332706
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
Because we create a new kind of debug instruction, DBG_LABEL, we need to
check all passes which use isDebugValue() to check MachineInstr is debug
instruction or not. When expelling debug instructions, we should expel
both DBG_VALUE and DBG_LABEL. So, I create a new function,
isDebugInstr(), in MachineInstr to check whether the MachineInstr is
debug instruction or not.
This patch has no new test case. I have run regression test and there is
no difference in regression test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45342
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331844
Inspired by r331508, I did a grep and found these.
Mostly just change from dyn_cast to cast. Some cases also showed a dyn_cast result being converted to bool, so those I changed to isa.
llvm-svn: 331577
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
This provides an optimized implementation of SADDO/SSUBO/UADDO/USUBO
as well as ADDCARRY/SUBCARRY on top of the new CC implementation.
In particular, multi-word arithmetic now uses UADDO/ADDCARRY instead
of the old ADDC/ADDE logic, which means we no longer need to use
"glue" links for those instructions. This also allows making full
use of the memory-based instructions like ALSI, which couldn't be
recognized due to limitations in the DAG matcher previously.
Also, the llvm.sadd.with.overflow et.al. intrinsincs now expand to
directly using the ADD instructions and checking for a CC 3 result.
llvm-svn: 331203
Currently, an instruction setting the condition code is linked to
the instruction using the condition code via a "glue" link in the
SelectionDAG. This has a number of drawbacks; in particular, it
means the same CC cannot be used by multiple users. It also makes
it more difficult to efficiently implement SADDO et. al.
This patch changes the back-end to represent CC dependencies as
normal values during SelectionDAG matching, along the lines of
how this is handled in the X86 back-end already.
In addition to the core mechanics of updating all relevant patterns,
this requires a number of additional changes:
- We now need to be able to spill/restore a CC value into a GPR
if necessary. This means providing a copyPhysReg implementation
for moves involving CC, and defining getCrossCopyRegClass.
- Since we still prefer to avoid such spills, we provide an override
for IsProfitableToFold to avoid creating a merged LOAD / ICMP if
this would result in multiple users of the CC.
- combineCCMask no longer requires a single CC user, and no longer
need to be careful about preventing invalid glue/chain cycles.
- emitSelect needs to be more careful in marking CC live-in to
the basic block it generates. Also, we can now optimize the
case of multiple subsequent selects with the same condition
just like X86 does.
llvm-svn: 331202
In patterns where we need to specify a result VT, prefer
[(set (tr.vt tr.op:$V1), (operator ...))]
over
[(set tr.op:$V1, (tr.vt (operator ...)))]
This is NFC now, but simplifies some future changes.
llvm-svn: 331192
If we have LOCR instructions, select them directly from SelectionDAG
instead of first going through a pseudo instruction and then using
the custom inserter to emit the LOCR.
Provide Select pseudo-instructions for VR32/VR64 if we have vector
instructions, to avoid having to go through the first 16 FPRs
unnecessarily.
If we do not have LOCFHR, prefer using LOCR followed by a move
over a conditional branch.
llvm-svn: 331191
If the MachineInstr uses a custom inserter and is then erased after
instruction selection, there is no use for mapping it to a sched class.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
llvm-svn: 331040
While not necessary for correctness, it is preferable for
performance reasons on all architectures we currently support
to align functions to 16-byte boundaries by default.
llvm-svn: 330718
The TargetSchedModel is always initialized using the TargetSubtargetInfo's
MCSchedModel and TargetInstrInfo, so we don't need to extract those and
pass 3 parameters to init().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44789
llvm-svn: 329540
Makes it easier to see mistakes such as the one fixed in r329178 and makes
the different target CMakeLists more consistent.
Also remove some stale-looking comments from the Nios2 target cmakefile.
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 329181
As in SystemZ backend, correctly propagate node ids when inserting new
unselected nodes into the DAG during instruction Seleciton for X86
target.
Fixes PR36865.
Reviewers: jyknight, craig.topper
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44797
llvm-svn: 328233
Summary:
The docs already claim that this happens, but so far it hasn't. As a
consequence, existing TableGen files get this wrong a lot, but luckily
the fixes are all reasonably straightforward.
To make this work with all the existing forms of self-references (since
the true type of a record is only built up over time), the lookup of
self-references in !cast is delayed until the final resolving step.
Change-Id: If5923a72a252ba2fbc81a889d59775df0ef31164
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44475
llvm-svn: 327849
If DoneMBB becomes empty it must have CC added to its live-in list, since it
will fall-through into EndMBB. This happens when the CLC loop does the
complete range.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
llvm-svn: 327834
This is similar to the check later when we remap some of the instructions from one class to a new one. But if we reuse the class we don't get to do that check.
So many CPUs have violations of this check that I had to add a flag to the SchedMachineModel to allow it to be disabled. Hopefully we can get those cleaned up quickly and remove this flag.
A lot of the violations are due to overlapping regular expressions, but that's not the only kind of issue it found.
llvm-svn: 327808
Jonas Paulsson