This commit adds tail call support to the MachineOutliner pass. This allows
the outliner to insert jumps rather than calls in areas where tail calling is
possible. Outlined tail calls include the return or terminator of the basic
block being outlined from.
Tail call support allows the outliner to take returns and terminators into
consideration while finding candidates to outline. It also allows the outliner
to save more instructions. For example, in the X86-64 outliner, a tail called
outlined function saves one instruction since no return has to be inserted.
llvm-svn: 297653
We don't need to check whether the fallback path is enabled to return
false. Just do that all the time on error cases, the caller knows (or
at least should know!) how to handle the failing case.
llvm-svn: 297535
The problem can occur in presence of subregs. If we are swapping two
instructions defining different subregs of the same register we will
get a new liveout from a block. We need to preserve value number for
block's liveout for successor block's livein to match.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30558
llvm-svn: 297534
Summary: No test case as none of the in-tree targets with GlobalISel support has this condition.
Reviewers: qcolombet, aditya_nandakumar, dsanders, t.p.northover, ab
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: dberris, rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30786
llvm-svn: 297512
Summary:
We don’t actually use LegalizerInfo in Legalizer pass, it’s just passed
as an argument.
In order to check if an instruction is legal or not, we need to get LegalizerInfo
by calling `MI.getParent()->getParent()->getSubtarget().getLegalizerInfo()`.
Instead, make LegalizerInfo accessible in LegalizerHelper.
Reviewers: qcolombet, aditya_nandakumar, dsanders, ab, t.p.northover, kristof.beyls
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: dberris, llvm-commits, rovka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30838
llvm-svn: 297491
Summary:
Depends on D30379
This improves the state of things for the sub class of operation.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30436
llvm-svn: 297482
Summary: As per title. This is extracted from D29872 and I threw SADDO in.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30379
llvm-svn: 297479
We currently have to insert bits via a temporary variable of the same size as the target with various shift/mask stages, resulting in further temporary variables, all of which require the allocation of memory for large APInts (MaskSizeInBits > 64).
This is another of the compile time issues identified in PR32037 (see also D30265).
This patch adds the APInt::insertBits() helper method which avoids the temporary memory allocation and masks/inserts the raw bits directly into the target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30780
llvm-svn: 297458
Summary: This essentially does the same transform as for ADC.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30417
llvm-svn: 297416
The good reason to do this is that static allocas are pretty simple to handle
(especially at -O0) and avoiding tracking DBG_VALUEs throughout the pipeline
should give some kind of performance benefit.
The bad reason is that the debug pipeline is an unholy mess of implicit
contracts, where determining whether "DBG_VALUE %reg, imm" actually implies a
load or not involves the services of at least 3 soothsayers and the sacrifice
of at least one chicken. And it still gets it wrong if the variable is at SP
directly.
llvm-svn: 297410
Summary: This essentially does the same transform as for SUBC.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30437
llvm-svn: 297404
As discussed in the review thread for rL297026, this is actually 2 changes that
would independently fix all of the test cases in the patch:
1. Return undef in FoldConstantArithmetic for div/rem by 0.
2. Move basic undef simplifications for div/rem (simplifyDivRem()) before
foldBinopIntoSelect() as a matter of efficiency.
I will handle the case of vectors with any zero element as a follow-up. That change
is the DAG sibling for D30665 + adding a check of vector elements to FoldConstantVectorArithmetic().
I'm deleting the test for PR30693 because it does not test for the actual bug any more
(dangers of using bugpoint).
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30741
llvm-svn: 297384
This commit changes the BumpPtrAllocator for suffix tree nodes to a SpecificBumpPtrAllocator.
Before, node construction was leaking memory because of the DenseMap in SuffixTreeNodes.
Changing this to a SpecificBumpPtrAllocator allows this memory to properly be released.
llvm-svn: 297319
This helps in cases involving bitfields where an AND is exposed by
legalization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30472
llvm-svn: 297249
Summary:
This will allow future patches to inspect the details of the LLT. The implementation is now split between
the Support and CodeGen libraries to allow TableGen to use this class without introducing layering concerns.
Thanks to Ahmed Bougacha for finding a reasonable way to avoid the layering issue and providing the version of this patch without that problem.
The problem with the previous commit appears to have been that TableGen was including CodeGen/LowLevelType.h instead of Support/LowLevelTypeImpl.h.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, ab, javed.absar
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle, mgorny, dberris, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30046
llvm-svn: 297241
We were calculating incorrect extract/insert offsets by trying to be too
tricksy with min/max. It's clearer to just split the logic up into "register
starts before this segment" vs "after".
llvm-svn: 297226
Some intrinsics take metadata parameters. These all need custom
handling of some form, and cannot possibly be lowered generically to
G_INTRINSIC calls with vreg operands.
Reject them, instead of hitting an assert later in getOrCreateVReg.
llvm-svn: 297209
When we translate a no-op (same type) bitcast, we try to be clever and
only emit a COPY if we already assigned a vreg to the defined value.
However, when we didn't, we tried to assign to a reference into the
ValToVReg DenseMap, even though the RHS of the assignment
(getOrCreateVReg) could potentially grow that DenseMap, invalidating the
reference.
Avoid that by getting the source vreg first.
I audited the rest of the translator; this is the only tricky case.
The test is quite unwieldy, as the problem is caused by the DenseMap
growing, which happens after the 47th mapped value.
llvm-svn: 297208
For vector operands, the `select` instruction supports both vector and
non-vector conditions. The MIR builder had an overly restrictive
assertion, that only accepted vector conditions for vector selects
(in effect implementing ISD::VSELECT).
Make it possible to express the full range of G_SELECTs.
llvm-svn: 297207
When computing the mapping for non-generic instructions, we skipped
%noreg operands, because we can't always reason about their banks.
Also skip them when applying the mapping. Otherwise, we could end
up with mappings that we can't apply.
While there, duplicate an assert to distinguish between the two
error conditions.
llvm-svn: 297201
When a dbg_value has a constant operand that isn't representable in MI,
there isn't much we can do. Use %noreg (0) for those situations.
This matches the SelectionDAG behavior.
llvm-svn: 297200
We cannot leave the identity copies 'select true, arg, undef' that this pass
inserts for arguments to simplify handling of values on swifterror arguments.
swifterror arguments have restrictions on their uses.
rdar://30839288
llvm-svn: 297197
More module problems. This time it only showed up in the stage 2 compile of
clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules-2 but not the stage 1 compile.
Somehow, this change causes the build to need Attributes.gen before it's been
generated.
llvm-svn: 297188
Summary:
This will allow future patches to inspect the details of the LLT. The implementation is now split between
the Support and CodeGen libraries to allow TableGen to use this class without introducing layering concerns.
Thanks to Ahmed Bougacha for finding a reasonable way to avoid the layering issue and providing the version of this patch without that problem.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, ab, javed.absar
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle, mgorny, dberris, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30046
llvm-svn: 297177
A bit more painful than G_INSERT because it was more widely used, but this
should simplify the handling of extract operations in most locations.
llvm-svn: 297100
This is known incomplete and not called in the right order relative to
other folds, but that's the current behavior. I'm just trying to clean
this up before making actual functional changes to make the patch smaller.
The logic here should mimic the IR equivalents that are in InstSimplify's
simplifyDivRem().
llvm-svn: 297086
Some late additions to DWARF v5 were not in Dwarf.def; also one form
was redefined. Add the new cases to relevant switches in different
parts of LLVM. Replace DW_FORM_ref_sup with DW_FORM_ref_sup[4,8].
I did not add support for DW_FORM_strx3/addrx3 other that defining the
constants. We don't have any infrastructure to support these.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D30664
llvm-svn: 297085
Jessica Paquette