This commit adds tail call support to the MachineOutliner pass. This allows
the outliner to insert jumps rather than calls in areas where tail calling is
possible. Outlined tail calls include the return or terminator of the basic
block being outlined from.
Tail call support allows the outliner to take returns and terminators into
consideration while finding candidates to outline. It also allows the outliner
to save more instructions. For example, in the X86-64 outliner, a tail called
outlined function saves one instruction since no return has to be inserted.
llvm-svn: 297653
For AVX-512 we force the input to zero if the input is undef or the mask is all ones to break an execution dependency. This patch brings the same behavior to AVX2.
llvm-svn: 297652
We were already forcing undef inputs to become a zero vector, this now catches an all ones mask too.
Ideally we'd use undef and let execution dep fix handle picking the best register/clearance for the undef, but I don't think it can handle the early clobber today.
llvm-svn: 297651
Previously we could round-trip type records from PDB -> Yaml ->
PDB, but for symbols we could only go from PDB -> Yaml. This
completes the round-tripping for symbols as well.
llvm-svn: 297625
If raw_fd_ostream is constructed with the path of "-", it claims
ownership of the stdout file descriptor. This means that it closes
stdout when it is destroyed. If there are multiple users of
raw_fd_ostream wrapped around stdout, then a crash can occur because
of operations on a closed stream.
An example of this would be running something like "clang -S -o - -MD
-MF - test.cpp". Alternatively, using outs() (which creates a local
version of raw_fd_stream to stdout) anywhere combined with such a
stream usage would cause the crash.
The fix duplicates the stdout file descriptor when used within
raw_fd_ostream, so that only that particular descriptor is closed when
the stream is destroyed.
Patch by James Henderson!
llvm-svn: 297624
We used to hit an unreachable in getRegBankFromRegClass when dealing with the
stack pointer. This commit adds support for the GPRsp reg class.
llvm-svn: 297621
This commit is a follow-up on r297580. It fixes the FIXME added temporarily
by that commit to keep the removal of Unroller's specialized version of
scalarizeInstruction() an NFC. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D30715 for details.
llvm-svn: 297610
Loop over the ARM decode tables; this is a clean-up to reduce some code
duplication.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30814
llvm-svn: 297608
The immediate should be 1 or 2, not 0 or 1. This was found while adding bounds checking to clang. In fact the existing clang builtin test failed if we ran it all the way to assembly.
llvm-svn: 297591
I noticed unnecessary 'sbb' instructions in D30472 and while looking at 'ptest' codegen recently.
This happens because we were transforming any 'setb' - even when we only wanted a single-bit result.
This patch moves those transforms under visitAdd/visitSub, so we we're only creating sbb/adc when it
is a win. I don't know why we need a SETCC_CARRY node type, but I'm not proposing to change that
existing behavior in this patch.
Also, I'm skeptical that sbb/adc are a win for all micro-arches, so I added comments to the test files
where this transform still fires.
The test changes here are all cases where we no longer produce sbb/adc. Avoiding partial register
stalls (generating an xor to clear a register) is not handled in some cases, but that's a separate
issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30611
llvm-svn: 297586
Summary:
A53 scheduler causes an assertion failure on all CRC instructions:
include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstr.h:280: const llvm::MachineOperand
&llvm::MachineInstr::getOperand(unsigned int) const: Assertion `i <
getNumOperands() && "getOperand() out of range!"' failed.
The case statements corresponding to CRC instructions are incorrect and should
be removed.
Also adding a testcase while on this.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, javed.absar, apazos, rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: evandro, aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30274
llvm-svn: 297582
Unroller's specialized scalarizeInstruction() is mostly duplicating Vectorizer's
variant. OTOH Vectorizer's scalarizeInstruction() already supports the special
case of VF==1 except for avoiding mask-bit extraction in that case. This patch
removes Unroller's specialized version in favor of a unified method.
The only functional difference between the two variants seems to be setting
memcheck metadata for loads and stores only in Vectorizer's variant, which is a
bug in Unroller. To keep this patch an NFC the unified method doesn't set
memcheck metadata for VF==1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30715
llvm-svn: 297580
I'm pretty sure there are more problems lurking here. But I think this fixes PR32241.
I've added the test case from that bug and added asserts that will fail if we ever try to copy between high registers and mask registers again.
llvm-svn: 297574
Without SSE41 (pextrb) we currently extract byte elements from a vector by spilling to stack and reloading the byte.
This patch is an initial attempt at using MOVD/PEXTRW to extract the relevant DWORD/WORD from the vector and then shift+truncate to collect the correct byte.
Extraction of multiple bytes this way would result in code bloat, but as explained in the patch we could probably afford to be more aggressive with the supported extractions before again falling back on spilling - possibly through counting the number of extracts and which DWORD/WORD they originate?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29841
llvm-svn: 297568
Since v_max_f32_e64/v_max_f16_e64 can be folded if the target
instruction supports the clamp bit, we also need to maintain
modifiers when converting v_mac to v_mad.
This fixes a rendering issue with Dirt Rally because a v_mac
instruction with the clamp bit set was converted to a v_mad
but that bit was lost during the conversion.
Fixes: e184e01dd79 ("AMDGPU: Fold FP clamp as modifier bit")
Patch by Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 297556
Summary:
Ths "cases" support was not quite finished, is unused, and is really just debug counters.
(well, almost, debug counters are slightly more powerful, in that they can skip things at the start, too).
Note, opt-bisect itself could also be implemented as a wrapper around
debug counters, but not sure it's worth it ATM.
I'll shove it on a todo list if we think it is.
Reviewers: MatzeB, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30856
llvm-svn: 297542
Summary:
This change solves the same problem as D30726, except that this only
throws out the bathwater.
AST was not correctly tracking and deleting UnknownInstructions via
handles. The existing code only tracks "pointers" in its
`ASTCallbackVH`, so an UnknownInstruction (that isn't also def'ing a
pointer used by another memory instruction) never gets a
`ASTCallbackVH`.
There are two other ways to solve this problem:
- Use the `PointerRec` scheme for both known and unknown instructions.
- Use a `CallbackVH` that erases the offending Instruction from the
UnknownInstruction list.
Both of the above changes seemed to be significantly (and unnecessarily
IMO) more complex than this.
Reviewers: chandlerc, dberlin, hfinkel, reames
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30849
llvm-svn: 297539
This method inverts the Reason field of a scheduling candidate.
It does right comparison between RegCritical and RegExcess, but
everything else is broken. In fact it can prefer less strong reason
such as Weak over RegCritical because Weak > -RegCritical.
The CandReason enum is properly sorted, so just remove artificial
ranking.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30557
llvm-svn: 297536
We don't need to check whether the fallback path is enabled to return
false. Just do that all the time on error cases, the caller knows (or
at least should know!) how to handle the failing case.
llvm-svn: 297535
The problem can occur in presence of subregs. If we are swapping two
instructions defining different subregs of the same register we will
get a new liveout from a block. We need to preserve value number for
block's liveout for successor block's livein to match.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30558
llvm-svn: 297534
Matt Arsenault