Two reasons for that:
* the declaration is not used. the LLDB_SOURCE_DIR is provided as the first argument in the script ($1) (called SRC_ROOT in the source code)
* add_custom_command is quoting the first argument of the command. Usually, it is the script itself (and then the full path to the script) but, here, it is the declaration of a variable.
It was failing with:
cd "/llvm-toolchain-3.3~svn179457/build-llvm/tools/lldb/scripts" && "SRCROOT=/llvm-toolchain-3.3~svn179457/tools/lldb" /llvm-toolchain-3.3~svn179457/tools/lldb/scripts/build-swig-wrapper-classes.sh /llvm-toolchain-3.3~svn179457/tools/lldb /llvm-toolchain-3.3~svn179457/build-llvm/tools/lldb/scripts /llvm-toolchain-3.3~svn179457/build-llvm/tools/lldb/scripts /llvm-toolchain-3.3~svn179457/build-llvm -m
/bin/sh: 1: SRCROOT=/llvm-toolchain-3.3~svn179457/tools/lldb: not found
llvm-svn: 179459
This is basically the same fix in three different places. We use a set to avoid
walking the whole tree of a big ConstantExprs multiple times.
For example: (select cmp, (add big_expr 1), (add big_expr 2))
We don't want to visit big_expr twice here, it may consist of thousands of
nodes.
The testcase exercises this by creating an insanely large ConstantExprs out of
a loop. It's questionable if the optimizer should ever create those, but this
can be triggered with real C code. Fixes PR15714.
llvm-svn: 179458
For functions that need to spill CRs, and have dynamic stack allocations, the
value of the SP during the restore is not what it was during the save, and so
we need to use the FP in these cases (as for all of the other spills and
restores, but the CR restore has a special code path because its reserved slot,
like the link register, is specified directly relative to the adjusted SP).
llvm-svn: 179457
The initial values were arbitrary. I want them to be more
conservative. This represents the number of latency cycles hidden by
OOO execution. In practice, I think it should be within a small factor
of the complex floating point operation latency so the scheduler can
make some attempt to hide latency even for smallish blocks.
These are by no means the best values, just a starting point for
tuning heuristics. Some benchmarks such as TSVC run faster with this
lower value for SandyBridge. I haven't run anything on Haswell, but
it's shouldn't be 2x SB.
llvm-svn: 179450
The register allocator expects minimal physreg live ranges. Schedule
physreg copies accordingly. This is slightly tricky when they occur in
the middle of the scheduling region. For now, this is handled by
rescheduling the copy when its associated instruction is
scheduled. Eventually we may instead bundle them, but only if we can
preserve the bundles as parallel copies during regalloc.
llvm-svn: 179449
I need to handle this for the test case in my following scheduler
commit.
Work is already under way to redesign the mechanism for node order
propagation because this case by case approach is unmaintainable.
llvm-svn: 179448
lets a ValueObject's contents be set from raw
data. This has certain limitations (notably,
registers can only be set to data that is as
large as the register) but will be useful for
the new Materializer.
I also exposed this interface through SBValue.
I have added a testcase that exercises various
special cases of SBValue::SetData().
llvm-svn: 179437
Use an newly introduce ASTContext::getBaseObjCCategoriesAfterInterface() which caches its
results instead of re-calculating the categories multiple times.
llvm-svn: 179436
The main benefit is to speed-up SourceManager::isBeforeInTranslationUnit which is common to query
the included/expanded location of the same FileID multiple times.
llvm-svn: 179435
defines a Return Address register (e.g. lr on arm) but the RA register
hasn't been saved anywhere yet -- it is still in a live reg.
<rdar://problem/13503130>
llvm-svn: 179431
implementation of C99's attempt to control the C++ standard. *sigh*
The C99 standard says that certain macros in <stdint.h>, such as SIZE_MAX,
should not be defined when the header is included in C++ mode, unless
__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS and __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS are defined. The C++11 standard
says "Thanks, but no thanks" and C11 removed this rule, but various C library
implementations (such as glibc) follow C99 anyway.
g++ prior to 4.8 worked around the C99 / glibc behavior by defining
__STDC_*_MACROS in <cstdint>, which was incorrect, because <stdint.h> is
supposed to provide these macros too. g++ 4.8 works around it by defining
__STDC_*_MACROS in its builtin <stdint.h> header.
This change makes Clang act like g++ 4.8 in this regard: our <stdint.h> now
countermands any attempt by the C library to implement the undesired C99 rules,
by defining the __STDC_*_MACROS first. Unlike g++, we do this even in C++98
mode, since that was the intent of the C++ committee, matches the behavior
required in C11, and matches our built-in implementation of <stdint.h>.
llvm-svn: 179419
for variables in the new Materializer. This is
much easier now that the ValueObject API is solid.
I still have to implement reading bytes into a
ValueObject, but committing what I have so far.
This code is not yet used, so there will be fixes
when I switch the expression parser over to use the
new Materializer.
llvm-svn: 179416
Howard Hinnant