- Teaches the ValueTracker in the PeepholeOptimizer to look through PHI
instructions.
- Add findNextSourceAndRewritePHI method to lookup into multiple sources
returnted by the ValueTracker and rewrite PHIs with new sources.
With these changes we can find more register sources and rewrite more
copies to allow coaslescing of bitcast instructions. Hence, we eliminate
unnecessary VR64 <-> GR64 copies in x86, but it could be extended to
other archs by marking "isBitcast" on target specific instructions. The
x86 example follows:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
C:
movd %r9, %mm0
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Becomes:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
C:
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11197
rdar://problem/20404526
llvm-svn: 242295
- Create a new CopyRewriter for Uncoalescable copy-like instructions
- Change the ValueTracker to return a ValueTrackerResult
This makes optimizeUncoalescable looks more like optimizeCoalescable and
use the CopyRewritter infrastructure.
This is also the preparation for looking up into PHI nodes in the
ValueTracker.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11195
llvm-svn: 242294
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
All of the cases were just appending from random access iterators to a
vector. Using insert/append can grow the vector to the perfect size
directly and moves the growing out of the loop. No intended functionalty
change.
llvm-svn: 230845
Peephole optimizer is scanning a basic block forward. At some point it
needs to answer the question "given a pointer to an MI in the current
BB, is it located before or after the current instruction".
To perform this, it keeps a set of the MIs already seen during the scan,
if a MI is not in the set, it is assumed to be after.
It means that newly created MIs have to be inserted in the set as well.
This commit passes the set as an argument to the target-dependent
optimizeSelect() so that it can properly update the set with the
(potentially) newly created MIs.
llvm-svn: 225772
Peephole optimization that generates a single conditional branch
for csinc-branch sequences like in the examples below. This is
possible when the csinc sets or clears a register based on a condition
code and the branch checks that register. Also the condition
code may not be modified between the csinc and the original branch.
Examples:
1. Convert csinc w9, wzr, wzr, <CC>;tbnz w9, #0, 0x44
to b.<invCC>
2. Convert csinc w9, wzr, wzr, <CC>; tbz w9, #0, 0x44
to b.<CC>
rdar://problem/18506500
llvm-svn: 219742
and TargetRegisterInfo in the peephole optimizer. This
makes it easier to grab subtarget dependent variables off
of the MachineFunction rather than the TargetMachine.
llvm-svn: 219669
The advanced copy optimization does not yield any difference on the whole llvm
test-suite + SPECs, either in compile time or runtime (binaries are identical),
but has a big potential when data go back and forth between register files as
demonstrated with test/CodeGen/ARM/adv-copy-opt.ll.
Note: This was measured for both Os and O3 for armv7s, arm64, and x86_64.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 216236
advanced copy optimization.
This is the final step patch toward transforming:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
bx lr
into:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
bx lr
Indeed, thanks to this patch, this optimization is able to look through
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
and is able to rewrite the following sequence:
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
into simple generic GPR copies that the coalescer managed to remove.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 216144
advanced copy optimization.
This patch is a step toward transforming:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
bx lr
into:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
bx lr
Indeed, thanks to this patch, this optimization is able to look through
vmov r0, r1, d16
but it does not understand yet
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
Comming patches will fix that and update the related test case.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 216136
the isRegSequence property.
This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the
isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM.
Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able
to optimize the following sequence:
vmov d0, r2, r3
vmov d1, r0, r1
vmov r0, s0
vmov r1, s2
udiv r0, r1, r0
vmov r1, s1
vmov r2, s3
udiv r1, r2, r1
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
bx lr
into:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
bx lr
This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole
optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that
replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register
file), copy.
With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations:
1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies:
PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy.
2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies:
PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy.
The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the
operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction
and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s).
Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100.
The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the
TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we
switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register
(virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with
register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo.
Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the
rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1).
Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole
optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting.
This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874
llvm-svn: 216088
That broke the build:
/data/buildslave/clang-amd64-freebsd/src-llvm/lib/CodeGen/PeepholeOptimizer.cpp:729:46: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'SmallPtrSet<[...], 8>' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'SmallPtrSet<[...], 16>'
Changed |= optimizeExtInstr(MI, MBB, LocalMIs);
^~~~~~~~
/data/buildslave/clang-amd64-freebsd/src-llvm/lib/CodeGen/PeepholeOptimizer.cpp:265:49: note: passing argument to parameter 'LocalMIs' here
SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*, 8> &LocalMIs) {
^
llvm-svn: 215341
copies.
This patch extends the peephole optimization introduced in r190713 to produce
register-coalescer friendly copies when possible.
This extension taught the existing cross-bank copy optimization how to deal
with the instructions that generate cross-bank copies, i.e., insert_subreg,
extract_subreg, reg_sequence, and subreg_to_reg.
E.g.
b = insert_subreg e, A, sub0 <-- cross-bank copy
...
C = copy b.sub0 <-- cross-bank copy
Would produce the following code:
b = insert_subreg e, A, sub0 <-- cross-bank copy
...
C = copy A <-- same-bank copy
This patch also introduces a new helper class for that: ValueTracker.
This class implements the logic to look through the copy related instructions
and get the related source.
For now, the advanced rewriting is disabled by default as we are lacking the
semantic on target specific instructions to catch the motivating examples.
Related to <rdar://problem/12702965>.
llvm-svn: 212100
define below all header includes in the lib/CodeGen/... tree. While the
current modules implementation doesn't check for this kind of ODR
violation yet, it is likely to grow support for it in the future. It
also removes one layer of macro pollution across all the included
headers.
Other sub-trees will follow.
llvm-svn: 206837
I should have read that comment a little more carefully. ;)
Regression test in the works, committing in the mean time to un-break people.
llvm-svn: 205511
operator* on the by-operand iterators to return a MachineOperand& rather than
a MachineInstr&. At this point they almost behave like normal iterators!
Again, this requires making some existing loops more verbose, but should pave
the way for the big range-based for-loop cleanups in the future.
llvm-svn: 203865
This patch fixes the bug in peephole optimization that folds a load which defines one vreg into the one and only use of that vreg. With debug info, a DBG_VALUE that referenced the vreg considered to be a use, preventing the optimization. The fix is to ignore DBG_VALUE's during the optimization, and undef a DBG_VALUE that references a vreg that gets removed.
Patch by Trevor Smigiel!
llvm-svn: 203829
The old system was fairly convoluted:
* A temporary label was created.
* A single PROLOG_LABEL was created with it.
* A few MCCFIInstructions were created with the same label.
The semantics were that the cfi instructions were mapped to the PROLOG_LABEL
via the temporary label. The output position was that of the PROLOG_LABEL.
The temporary label itself was used only for doing the mapping.
The new CFI_INSTRUCTION has a 1:1 mapping to MCCFIInstructions and points to
one by holding an index into the CFI instructions of this function.
I did consider removing MMI.getFrameInstructions completelly and having
CFI_INSTRUCTION own a MCCFIInstruction, but MCCFIInstructions have non
trivial constructors and destructors and are somewhat big, so the this setup
is probably better.
The net result is that we don't create temporary labels that are never used.
llvm-svn: 203204
By definition copies across register banks are not coalescable. Still, it may be
possible to get rid of such a copy when the value is available in another
register of the same register file.
Consider the following example, where capital and lower letters denote different
register file:
b = copy A <-- cross-bank copy
...
C = copy b <-- cross-bank copy
This could have been optimized this way:
b = copy A <-- cross-bank copy
...
C = copy A <-- same-bank copy
Note: b and C's definitions may be in different basic blocks.
This patch adds a peephole optimization that looks through a chain of copies
leading to a cross-bank copy and reuses a source that is on the same register
file if available.
This solution could also be used to get rid of some copies (e.g., A could have
been used instead of C). However, we do not do so because:
- It may over constrain the coloring of the source register for coalescing.
- The register allocator may not be able to find a nice split point for the
longer live-range, leading to more spill.
<rdar://problem/14742333>
llvm-svn: 190713
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Increment the MBB iterator at the top of the loop to properly handle the
current (and previous) instructions getting erased.
This fixes PR13625.
llvm-svn: 162099
Select instructions pick one of two virtual registers based on a
condition, like x86 cmov. On targets like ARM that support predication,
selects can sometimes be eliminated by predicating the instruction
defining one of the operands.
Teach PeepholeOptimizer to recognize select instructions, and ask the
target to optimize them.
llvm-svn: 162059
Add more comments and use early returns to reduce nesting in isLoadFoldable.
Also disable folding for V_SET0 to avoid introducing a const pool entry and
a const pool load.
rdar://10554090 and rdar://11873276
llvm-svn: 161207
Machine CSE and other optimizations can remove instructions so folding
is possible at peephole while not possible at ISel.
This patch is a rework of r160919 and was tested on clang self-host on my local
machine.
rdar://10554090 and rdar://11873276
llvm-svn: 161152
Machine CSE and other optimizations can remove instructions so folding
is possible at peephole while not possible at ISel.
rdar://10554090 and rdar://11873276
llvm-svn: 160919
The PPC::EXTSW instruction preserves the low 32 bits of its input, just
like some of the x86 instructions. Use it to reduce register pressure
when the low 32 bits have multiple uses.
This requires a small change to PeepholeOptimizer since EXTSW takes a
64-bit input register.
This is related to PR5997.
llvm-svn: 158743
The commit is intended to fix rdar://11540023.
It is implemented as part of peephole optimization. We can actually implement
this in the SelectionDAG lowering phase.
llvm-svn: 158122
Bruno Cardoso Lopes