The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Summary:
This patch is part of http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2181.
In-class initializers are appended to the CFG when CFGBuilder::addInitializer is called.
Reviewers: jordan_rose, rsmith
Reviewed By: jordan_rose
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D2370
llvm-svn: 238913
If the type isn't trivially moveable emplace can skip a potentially
expensive move. It also saves a couple of characters.
Call sites were found with the ASTMatcher + some semi-automated cleanup.
memberCallExpr(
argumentCountIs(1), callee(methodDecl(hasName("push_back"))),
on(hasType(recordDecl(has(namedDecl(hasName("emplace_back")))))),
hasArgument(0, bindTemporaryExpr(
hasType(recordDecl(hasNonTrivialDestructor())),
has(constructExpr()))),
unless(isInTemplateInstantiation()))
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 238601
These checks detect potential deadlocks caused by inconsistent lock
ordering. The checks are implemented under the -Wthread-safety-beta flag.
This patch also replaces calls to getAttrs() with calls to attrs() throughout
ThreadSafety.cpp, which fixes the earlier issue that cause assert failures.
llvm-svn: 228051
These checks detect potential deadlocks caused by inconsistent lock
ordering. The checks are implemented under the -Wthread-safety-beta flag.
llvm-svn: 227997
warns when a guarded variable is passed by reference as a function argument.
This is released as a separate warning flag, because it could potentially
break existing code that uses thread safety analysis.
llvm-svn: 218087
til::SExpr. This is a large patch, with many small changes to pretty printing
and expression lowering to make the new SExpr representation equivalent in
functionality to the old.
llvm-svn: 214089
The compilation pipeline doesn't actually need to know about the high-level
concept of diagnostic mappings, and hiding the final computed level presents
several simplifications and other potential benefits.
The only exceptions are opportunistic checks to see whether expensive code
paths can be avoided for diagnostics that are guaranteed to be ignored at a
certain SourceLocation.
This commit formalizes that invariant by introducing and using
DiagnosticsEngine::isIgnored() in place of individual level checks throughout
lex, parse and sema.
llvm-svn: 211005
which warns on compound conditionals that always evaluate to the same value.
For instance, (x > 5 && x < 3) will always be false since no value for x can
satisfy both conditions.
This patch also changes the CFG to use these tautological values for better
branch analysis. The test for -Wunreachable-code shows how this change catches
additional dead code.
Patch by Anders Rönnholm.
llvm-svn: 205665
Taking a hint from -Wparentheses, use an extra '()' as a sigil that
a dead condition is intentionally dead. For example:
if ((0)) { dead }
When this sigil is found, do not emit a dead code warning. When the
analysis sees:
if (0)
it suggests inserting '()' as a Fix-It.
llvm-svn: 205069
The exception is return statements that include control-flow,
which are clearly doing something "interesting".
99% of the cases I examined for -Wunreachable-code that fired
on return statements were not interesting enough to warrant
being in -Wunreachable-code by default. Thus the move to
include them in -Wunreachable-code-return.
This simplifies a bunch of logic, including removing the ad hoc
logic to look for std::string literals.
llvm-svn: 204307
Also relax unreachable 'break' and 'return' to not check for being
preceded by a call to 'noreturn'. That turns out to not be so
interesting in practice.
llvm-svn: 204000
Recent work on -Wunreachable-code has focused on suppressing uninteresting
unreachable code that center around "configuration values", but
there are still some set of cases that are sometimes interesting
or uninteresting depending on the codebase. For example, a dead
"break" statement may not be interesting for a particular codebase,
potentially because it is auto-generated or simply because code
is written defensively.
To address these workflow differences, -Wunreachable-code is now
broken into several diagnostic groups:
-Wunreachable-code: intended to be a reasonable "default" for
most users.
and then other groups that turn on more aggressive checking:
-Wunreachable-code-break: warn about dead break statements
-Wunreachable-code-trivial-return: warn about dead return statements
that return "trivial" values (e.g., return 0). Other return
statements that return non-trivial values are still reported
under -Wunreachable-code (this is an area subject to more refinement).
-Wunreachable-code-aggressive: supergroup that enables all these
groups.
The goal is to eventually make -Wunreachable-code good enough to
either be in -Wall or on-by-default, thus finessing these warnings
into different groups helps achieve maximum signal for more users.
TODO: the tests need to be updated to reflect this extra control
via diagnostic flags.
llvm-svn: 203994
This warning has a whole bunch of known false positives, much of them due
to code that is "sometimes unreachable". This can caused by code that
is conditionally generated by the preprocessor, branches that are defined
in terms of architecture-specific details (e.g., the size of a type), and
so on. While these are all good things to address one by one, the reality
is that this warning has received little love lately. By restricting
its purvue, we can focus on the top issues effecting main files, which
should be smaller, and then gradually widen the scope.
llvm-svn: 201607
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
In an expression like "new (a, b) Foo(x, y)", two things happen:
- Memory is allocated by calling a function named 'operator new'.
- The memory is initialized using the constructor for 'Foo'.
Currently the analyzer only models the second event, though it has special
cases for both the default and placement forms of operator new. This patch
is the first step towards properly modeling both events: it changes the CFG
so that the above expression now generates the following elements.
1. a
2. b
3. (CFGNewAllocator)
4. x
5. y
6. Foo::Foo
The analyzer currently ignores the CFGNewAllocator element, but the next
step is to treat that as a call like any other.
The CFGNewAllocator element is not added to the CFG for analysis-based
warnings, since none of them take advantage of it yet.
llvm-svn: 199123
This new warning detects when a function will recursively call itself on every
code path though that function. This catches simple recursive cases such as:
void foo() {
foo();
}
As well as more complex functions like:
void bar() {
if (test()) {
bar();
return;
} else {
bar();
}
return;
}
This warning uses the CFG. As with other CFG-based warnings, this is off
by default. Due to false positives, this warning is also disabled for
templated functions.
llvm-svn: 197853
to be treated as return values, and marked with the "returned_typestate"
attribute. Patch by chris.wailes@gmail.com; reviewed by delesley@google.com.
llvm-svn: 192932
Benjamin Kramer