(__is_pod, __is_signed, etc.) to normal identifiers if they are
encountered in certain places in the grammar where we know that prior
versions of libstdc++ or libc++ use them, to still allow the use of
these keywords as type traits. Fixes <rdar://problem/9836262> and PR10184.
llvm-svn: 162937
as a keyword for the __is_signed type trait. Cope with this conflict
via some hackish recovery: if we see a declaration of the form
static const bool __is_signed
then we stop treating __is_signed as a keyword and instead treat it as
an identifier. It's ugly, but it's better than making the __is_signed
type trait conditional on some language flag. Fixes PR9804.
llvm-svn: 130399
<tr1/hashtable> header, where a friend class template
std::tr1::__detail::_Map_base is declared with the wrong template
parameters. GCC doesn't catch the problem, so Clang does a little
back-flip to avoid diagnosing just this one instance of the problem.
llvm-svn: 100790
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
The problem this change addresses is that we treat __is_pod and
__is_empty as keywords in C++, because they are built-in type traits
in GCC >= 4.3. However, GNU libstdc++ 4.2 (and possibly earlier
versions) define implementation-detail struct templates named __is_pod
and __is_empty.
This commit solves the problem by recognizing
struct __is_pod
and
struct __is_empty
as special token sequences. When one of these token sequences is
encountered, the keyword (__is_pod or __is_empty) is implicitly
downgraded to an identifier so that parsing can continue. This is an
egregious hack, but it has the virtue of "just working" whether
someone is using libstdc++ 4.2 or not, without the need for special
flags.
llvm-svn: 80988
Douglas Gregor