Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Fangrui Song 024bf27ddf [ELF][ARM] Allow PT_LOAD to have overlapping p_offset ranges on EM_ARM
Port the D64906 technique to ARM. It deletes 3 alignments at
PT_LOAD boundaries for the default case: the size of an arm binary
decreases by at most 12kb.

Reviewed By: grimar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66749

llvm-svn: 370049
2019-08-27 11:52:36 +00:00
Fangrui Song fdbc2bd2aa [ELF][ARM] Add --no-show-raw-insn and -soname to some ARM tests
Delete some insignificant addresses to make it simpler for layout
changes.

llvm-svn: 370048
2019-08-27 11:50:27 +00:00
Fangrui Song 07f8daf05e [ELF] Simplify RelRo, TLS, NOBITS section ranks and make RW PT_LOAD start with RelRo
Old: PT_LOAD(.data | PT_GNU_RELRO(.data.rel.ro .bss.rel.ro) | .bss)
New: PT_LOAD(PT_GNU_RELRO(.data.rel.ro .bss.rel.ro) | .data .bss)

The placement of | indicates page alignment caused by PT_GNU_RELRO. The
new layout has simpler rules and saves space for many cases.

Old size: roundup(.data) + roundup(.data.rel.ro)
New size: roundup(.data.rel.ro + .bss.rel.ro) + .data

Other advantages:

* At runtime the 3 memory mappings decrease to 2.
* start(PT_TLS) = start(PT_GNU_RELRO) = start(RW PT_LOAD). This
  simplifies binary manipulation tools.
  GNU strip before 2.31 discards PT_GNU_RELRO if its
  address is not equal to the start of its associated PT_LOAD.
  This has been fixed by https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f2731e0c374e5323ce4cdae2bcc7b7fe22da1a6f
  But with this change, we will be compatible with GNU strip before 2.31
* Before, .got.plt (non-relro by default) was placed before .got (relro
  by default), which made it impossible to have _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
  (start of .got.plt on x86-64) equal to the end of .got (R_GOT*_FROM_END)
  (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36555). With the new ordering, we
  can improve on this regard if we'd like to.

Reviewers: ruiu, espindola, pcc

Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits, joerg, jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56828

llvm-svn: 356117
2019-03-14 03:47:45 +00:00
Fangrui Song b6772b86e2 [ELF] Move `// REQUIRES:` line to the top
llvm-svn: 335676
2018-06-26 22:20:04 +00:00
Rafael Espindola 97c57b9e7b Don't create a dummy __tls_get_addr.
We just don't need one with the current setup.

We only error on undefined references that are used by some
relocation.

If we managed to relax all uses of __tls_get_addr, no relocation uses
it and we don't produce an error.

This is less code and fixes the case were we fail to relax. Before we
would produce a broken output, but now we produce an error.

llvm-svn: 315334
2017-10-10 17:27:34 +00:00
George Rimar d46753e421 [ELF] - Do --hash-style=both by default.
Its PR34712,

GNU linkers recently changed default values to "both" of "sysv".
Patch do the same for all targets except MIPS, where .gnu.hash
section is not yet supported.

Code suggested by Rui Ueyama.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38407

llvm-svn: 315051
2017-10-06 09:37:44 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 628ec9f193 ELF: Place relro sections after non-relro sections in r/w segment.
This is in preparation for my next change, which will introduce a relro
nobits section. That requires that relro sections appear at the end of the
progbits part of the r/w segment so that the relro nobits section can appear
contiguously.

Because of the amount of churn required in the test suite, I'm making this
change separately.

llvm-svn: 291523
2017-01-10 01:21:30 +00:00
Peter Smith de3e73880e [ELF] Add support for static TLS to ARM
The module index dynamic relocation R_ARM_DTPMOD32 is always 1 for an
executable. When static linking and when we know that we are not a shared
object we can resolve the module index relocation statically.
    
The logic in handleNoRelaxTlsRelocation remains the same for Mips as it
has its own custom GOT writing code. For ARM we add the module index
relocation to the GOT when it can be resolved statically.
    
In addition the type of the RelExpr for the static resolution of TlsGotRel
should be R_TLS and not R_ABS as we need to include the size of
the thread control block in the calculation.
    
Addresses the TLS part of PR30218.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27213

llvm-svn: 288153
2016-11-29 16:23:50 +00:00
Peter Smith fde6213fe8 [ARM] ARM TLS shouldn't use relaxations
The ARM TLS relocations are placed on literal data and not the 
code-sequence, it is therefore not possible to implement the relaxTls* 
functions. This change updates handleMipsTlsRelocation() to
handleNoRelaxTlsRelocation() and incorporates ARM as well as Mips.

The ARM support in handleNoRelaxTlsRelocation() currently needs to ouput
the module index dynamic relocation in all cases as it is relying on the 
dynamic linker to set the module index in the got.

Should address PR30218

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24827

llvm-svn: 282250
2016-09-23 13:54:48 +00:00