LLVM converts adds into ors when it can prove that the operands don't share
any non-zero bits. Teach address folding to recognize or instructions with
constant operands with this property that can be folded into addresses as
if they were adds.
llvm-svn: 261562
This is what was meant to be in the initial commit to fix this bug. The
parens were missing. This commit also adds a test case for the bug and
has undergone full testing on PPC and X86.
llvm-svn: 261546
This reverts commit r261510, effectively reapplying r261509. The
original commit missed a caller in AArch64ConditionalCompares.
Original commit message:
Pass non-null arguments by reference in MachineTraceMetrics::Trace,
simplifying future work to remove implicit iterator => pointer
conversions.
llvm-svn: 261511
Delete MachineInstr::getIterator(), since the term "iterator" is
overloaded when talking about MachineInstr.
- Downcast to ilist_node in iplist::getNextNode() and getPrevNode() so
that ilist_node::getIterator() is still available.
- Add it back as MachineInstr::getInstrIterator(). This matches the
naming in MachineBasicBlock.
- Add MachineInstr::getBundleIterator(). This is explicitly called
"bundle" (not matching MachineBasicBlock) to disintinguish it clearly
from ilist_node::getIterator().
- Update all calls. Some of these I switched to `auto` to remove
boiler-plate, since the new name is clear about the type.
There was one call I updated that looked fishy, but it wasn't clear what
the right answer was. This was in X86FrameLowering::inlineStackProbe(),
added in r252578 in lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp. I opted to
leave the behaviour unchanged, but I'll reply to the original commit on
the list in a moment.
llvm-svn: 261504
I missed == and != when I removed implicit conversions between iterators
and pointers in r252380 since they were defined outside ilist_iterator.
Since they depend on getNodePtrUnchecked(), they indirectly rely on UB.
This commit removes all uses of these operators. (I'll delete the
operators themselves in a separate commit so that it can be easily
reverted if necessary.)
There should be NFC here.
llvm-svn: 261498
Add support for the case where we have a consecutive load (which must include the first + last elements) with a mixture of undef/zero elements. We load the vector and then apply a shuffle to clear the zero'd elements.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17297
llvm-svn: 261490
Summary:
- Rename `"skylake"` == SkylakeServerProc to `"skylake-avx512"`
- Change `"skylake"` to denote SkylakeClientProc
- Fix the detection of cpu family 6 and model 94 to be
SkylakeClientProc instead of SkylakeServerProc
- Remove the `"cnl"` for CannonLake
Reviewers: craig.topper, delena
Subscribers: zansari, echristo, qcolombet, RKSimon, spatel, DavidKreitzer, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17090
llvm-svn: 261482
COFF doesn't have sections with mergeable contents. Instead, each
constant pool entry ends up in a COMDAT section. The linker, when
choosing between COMDAT sections, doesn't choose the max alignment of
the two sections. You just get whatever alignment was on the section.
If one constant needed a higher alignment in one object file from
another one, then we will get into trouble if the linker chooses the
lower alignment one.
Instead, lets promote the alignment of the constant pool entry to make
sure we don't use an under aligned constant with an instruction which
assumed otherwise.
This fixes PR26680.
llvm-svn: 261462
The stack pointer is bumped when there is a frame pointer or when there
are static-size objects, but was only getting written back when there
were static-size objects.
llvm-svn: 261453
The patch has a necessary call to a function inside an assert. Which is fine
when you have asserts turned on. Not so much when they're off. Sorry about
the regression.
llvm-svn: 261447
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17294
It ensures that whatever block we are emitting the prologue/epilogue into, we
have the necessary scratch registers. It takes away the hard-coded register
numbers for use as scratch registers as registers that are guaranteed to be
available in the function prologue/epilogue are not guaranteed to be available
within the function body. Since we shrink-wrap, the prologue/epilogue may end
up in the function body.
llvm-svn: 261441
Fixed a bug introduced by D16683 when a binary shuffle is simplified to a unary shuffle (with undef/zero sentinel mask indices) - if this resulted in only the second input being used combineX86ShuffleChain failed to take this into account and still referenced the first input.
llvm-svn: 261434
First small step towards fixing PR26667 - we need to ensure that combineX86ShuffleChain only gets called with a valid shuffle input node (a similar issue was found in D17041).
llvm-svn: 261433
TLSADDR nodes are lowered into actuall calls inside MC. In order to prevent
shrink-wrapping from pushing prologue/epilogue past them (which result
in TLS variables being accessed before the stack frame is set up), we
put markers, so that the stack gets adjusted properly.
Thanks to Quentin Colombet for guidance/help on how to fix this problem!
llvm-svn: 261387
Summary:
Instead of trying to replace SMRD instructions with a VGPR base pointer
with an equivalent MUBUF instruction, we now copy the base pointer to
SGPRs using v_readfirstlane.
This is safe to do, because any load selected as an SMRD instruction
has been proven to have a uniform base pointer, so each thread in the
wave will have the same pointer value in VGPRs.
This will fix some errors on VI from trying to replace SMRD instructions
with addr64-enabled MUBUF instructions that don't exist.
Reviewers: arsenm, cfang, nhaehnle
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17305
llvm-svn: 261385
Summary:
When optimizing for size, sqrt calls can be incorrectly selected as
AVX512 VSQRT instructions. This is because X86InstrAVX512.td has a
`Requires<[OptForSize]>` in its `avx512_sqrt_scalar` multiclass
definition. Even if the target does not support AVX512, the class can
apparently still be chosen, leading to an incorrect selection of
`vsqrtss`.
In PR26625, this lead to an assertion: Reg >= X86::FP0 && Reg <=
X86::FP6 && "Expected FP register!", because the `vsqrtss` instruction
requires an XMM register, which is not available on i686 CPUs.
Reviewers: grosbach, resistor, joker.eph
Subscribers: spatel, emaste, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17414
llvm-svn: 261360
Summary:
This was broken in r260694 which swapped the address and data operands
for flat store instructions. The code in SIInsertWaits assumes
that the data operand always comes before the address operand, so
we need to add a special case for flat.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17366
llvm-svn: 261330
According to the SystemZ ABI, 128-bit integer types should be
passed and returned via implicit reference. However, this is
not currently implemented at the LLVM IR level for the i128
type. This does not matter when compiling C/C++ code, since
clang will implement the implicit reference itself.
However, it turns out that when calling libgcc helper routines
operating on 128-bit integers, LLVM will use i128 argument and
return value types; the resulting code is not compatible with
the ABI used in libgcc, leading to crashes (see PR26559).
This should be simple to fix, except that i128 currently is not
even a legal type for the SystemZ back end. Therefore, common
code will already split arguments and return values into multiple
parts. The bulk of this patch therefore consists of detecting
such parts, and correctly handling passing via implicit reference
of a value split into multiple parts. If at some time in the
future, i128 becomes a legal type, this code can be removed again.
This fixes PR26559.
llvm-svn: 261325
Davide Italiano