Namely, check if the target allows to fold more that one register in the
addressing mode and if yes, adjust the cost accordingly.
Prior to this commit, reg1 + scale * reg2 accesses were artificially preferred
to reg1 + reg2 accesses. Indeed, the cost model wrongly assumed that reg1 + reg2
needs a temporary register for the computation, whereas it was correctly
estimated for reg1 + scale * reg2.
<rdar://problem/13973908>
llvm-svn: 183021
iteration.
This on step toward non-iterative GVN. My local hack suggests that getting rid
of iteration will speedup GVN by 30%+ on a medium sized input (2k LOC, C++).
I cannot explain why not 2x or more at this moment.
llvm-svn: 181532
Test case by Michele Scandale!
Fixes PR10293: Load not hoisted out of loop with multiple exits.
There are few regressions with this patch, now tracked by
rdar:13817079, and a roughly equal number of improvements. The
regressions are almost certainly back luck because LoopRotate has very
little idea of whether rotation is profitable. Doing better requires a
more comprehensive solution.
This checkin is a quick fix that lacks generality (PR10293 has
a counter-example). But it trivially fixes the case in PR10293 without
interfering with other cases, and it does satify the criteria that
LoopRotate is a loop canonicalization pass that should avoid
heuristics and special cases.
I can think of two approaches that would probably be better in
the long run. Ultimately they may both make sense.
(1) LoopRotate should check that the current header would make a good
loop guard, and that the loop does not already has a sufficient
guard. The artifical SimplifiedLoopLatch check would be unnecessary,
and the design would be more general and canonical. Two difficulties:
- We need a strong guarantee that we won't endlessly rotate, so the
analysis would need to be precise in order to avoid the
SimplifiedLoopLatch precondition.
- Analysis like this are usually based on SCEV, which we don't want to
rely on.
(2) Rotate on-demand in late loop passes. This could even be done by
shoving the loop back on the queue after the optimization that needs
it. This could work well when we find LICM opportunities in
multi-branch loops. This requires some work, and it doesn't really
solve the problem of SCEV wanting a loop guard before the analysis.
llvm-svn: 181230
This function consists of following steps:
1. Collect dependent memory accesses.
2. Analyze availability.
3. Perform fully redundancy elimination, or
4. Perform PRE, depending on the availability
Step 2, 3 and 4 are now moved to three helper routines.
llvm-svn: 181047
Actually it took me couple of hours trying to make sense of them and
only to find they are dead code. I guess the original author used
"allSingleSucc" to indicate if there are any critial edge emanating
from some blocks, and tried to perform code motion (actually speculation)
in the presence of these critical edges; but later on he/she changed mind
and decided to perform edge-splitting first.
llvm-svn: 180951
the things, and renames it to CBindingWrapping.h. I also moved
CBindingWrapping.h into Support/.
This new file just contains the macros for defining different wrap/unwrap
methods.
The calls to those macros, as well as any custom wrap/unwrap definitions
(like for array of Values for example), are put into corresponding C++
headers.
Doing this required some #include surgery, since some .cpp files relied
on the fact that including Wrap.h implicitly caused the inclusion of a
bunch of other things.
This also now means that the C++ headers will include their corresponding
C API headers; for example Value.h must include llvm-c/Core.h. I think
this is harmless, since the C API headers contain just external function
declarations and some C types, so I don't believe there should be any
nasty dependency issues here.
llvm-svn: 180881
When Reassociator optimize "(x | C1)" ^ "(X & C2)", it may swap the two
subexpressions, however, it forgot to swap cached constants (of C1 and C2)
accordingly.
rdar://13739160
llvm-svn: 180676
This is an edge case that can happen if we modify a chain of multiple selects.
Update all operands in that case and remove the assert. PR15805.
llvm-svn: 179982
I brazenly think this change is slightly simpler than r178793 because:
- no "state" in functor
- "OpndPtrs[i]" looks simpler than "&Opnds[OpndIndices[i]]"
While I can reproduce the probelm in Valgrind, it is rather difficult to come up
a standalone testing case. The reason is that when an iterator is invalidated,
the stale invalidated elements are not yet clobbered by nonsense data, so the
optimizer can still proceed successfully.
Thank Benjamin for fixing this bug and generously providing the test case.
llvm-svn: 179062
The fix for PR14972 in r177055 introduced a real think-o in the *store*
side, likely because I was much more focused on the load side. While we
can arbitrarily widen (or narrow) a loaded value, we can't arbitrarily
widen a value to be stored, as that changes the width of memory access!
Lock down the code path in the store rewriting which would do this to
only handle the intended circumstance.
All of the existing tests continue to pass, and I've added a test from
the PR.
llvm-svn: 178974
This optimization is unstable at this moment; it
1) block us on a very important application
2) PR15200
3) test6 and test7 in test/Transforms/ScalarRepl/dynamic-vector-gep.ll
(the CHECK command compare the output against wrong result)
I personally believe this optimization should not have any impact on the
autovectorized code, as auto-vectorizer is supposed to put gather/scatter
in a "right" way. Although in theory downstream optimizaters might reveal
some gather/scatter optimization opportunities, the chance is quite slim.
For the hand-crafted vectorizing code, in term of redundancy elimination,
load-CSE, copy-propagation and DSE can collectively achieve the same result,
but in much simpler way. On the other hand, these optimizers are able to
improve the code in a incremental way; in contrast, SROA is sort of all-or-none
approach. However, SROA might slighly win in stack size, as it tries to figure
out a stretch of memory tightenly cover the area accessed by the dynamic index.
rdar://13174884
PR15200
llvm-svn: 178912
OpndPtrs stored pointers into the Opnd vector that became invalid when the
vector grows. Store indices instead. Sadly I only have a large testcase that
only triggers under valgrind, so I didn't include it.
llvm-svn: 178793
The key part of this is ensuring that name prefixes remain in a Twine
form until we get to a point where we can nuke them under NDEBUG. This
is tricky using the old APIs as they played fast and loose with Twine,
which is prone to serious error. The inserter is much cleaner as it is
actually in the call stack leading to the setName call, and so has
a good opportunity to prepend the prefix.
This matters more than you might imagine because most runs over an
alloca find a single partition, and rewrite 3 or 4 instructions
referring to it. As a consequence doing this lazily and exclusively with
Twine allows the optimizer to delete more of it and shaves another 2% to
3% off of the release build's SROA run time for PR15412. I also think
the APIs are cleaner, and the use of Twine is more reliable, so
I consider it a win-win despite the churn required to reach this state.
llvm-svn: 177631
The simplify-libcalls pass implemented a doInitialization hook to infer
function prototype attributes for well-known functions. Given that the
simplify-libcalls pass is going away *and* that the functionattrs pass
is already in place to deduce function attributes, I am moving this logic
to the functionattrs pass. This approach was discussed during patch
review:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121126/157465.html.
llvm-svn: 177619
This is espcially important because the new SROA pass goes to great
lengths to provide helpful names for debugging, and as a consequence
they can become very slow to render.
Good for between 5% and 15% of the SROA runtime on some slow test cases
such as the one in PR15412.
llvm-svn: 177495
- it is trivially known to be used inside the loop in a way that can not be optimized away
- there is no use outside of the loop which can take advantage of the computation hoisting
llvm-svn: 177432
The fundamental problem is that SROA didn't allow for overly wide loads
where the bits past the end of the alloca were masked away and the load
was sufficiently aligned to ensure there is no risk of page fault, or
other trapping behavior. With such widened loads, SROA would delete the
load entirely rather than clamping it to the size of the alloca in order
to allow mem2reg to fire. This was exposed by a test case that neatly
arranged for GVN to run first, widening certain loads, followed by an
inline step, and then SROA which miscompiles the code. However, I see no
reason why this hasn't been plaguing us in other contexts. It seems
deeply broken.
Diagnosing all of the above took all of 10 minutes of debugging. The
really annoying aspect is that fixing this completely breaks the pass.
;] There was an implicit reliance on the fact that no loads or stores
extended past the alloca once we decided to rewrite them in the final
stage of SROA. This was used to encode information about whether the
loads and stores had been split across multiple partitions of the
original alloca. That required threading explicit tracking of whether
a *use* of a partition is split across multiple partitions.
Once that was done, another problem arose: we allowed splitting of
integer loads and stores iff they were loads and stores to the entire
alloca. This is a really arbitrary limitation, and splitting at least
some integer loads and stores is crucial to maximize promotion
opportunities. My first attempt was to start removing the restriction
entirely, but currently that does Very Bad Things by causing *many*
common alloca patterns to be fully decomposed into i8 operations and
lots of or-ing together to produce larger integers on demand. The code
bloat is terrifying. That is still the right end-goal, but substantial
work must be done to either merge partitions or ensure that small i8
values are eagerly merged in some other pass. Sadly, figuring all this
out took essentially all the time and effort here.
So the end result is that we allow splitting only when the load or store
at least covers the alloca. That ensures widened loads and stores don't
hurt SROA, and that we don't rampantly decompose operations more than we
have previously.
All of this was already fairly well tested, and so I've just updated the
tests to cover the wide load behavior. I can add a test that crafts the
pass ordering magic which caused the original PR, but that seems really
brittle and to provide little benefit. The fundamental problem is that
widened loads should Just Work.
llvm-svn: 177055
* Only apply divide bypass optimization when not optimizing for size.
* Fixed bug caused by constant for 0 value of type Int32,
used dividend type to generate the constant instead.
* For atom x86-64 apply the divide bypass to use 16-bit divides instead of
64-bit divides when operand values are small enough.
* Added lit tests for 64-bit divide bypass.
Patch by Tyler Nowicki!
llvm-svn: 176442
This is a common pattern with dyn_cast and similar constructs, when the
PHI no longer depends on the select it can often be turned into a simpler
construct or even get hoisted out of the loop.
PR15340.
llvm-svn: 175995
The 'nobuiltin' attribute is applied to call sites to indicate that LLVM should
not treat the callee function as a built-in function. I.e., it shouldn't try to
replace that function with different code.
llvm-svn: 175835
Quentin Colombet