Currently, Cortex-A72 is modelled as an Cortex-A57 except the fp
load balancing pass isn't enabled for Cortex-A72 as it's not
profitable to have it enabled for this core.
Patch by Ranjeet Singh.
llvm-svn: 228140
This associates movss and movsd with the packed single and packed double
execution domains (resp.). While this is largely cosmetic, as we now
don't have weird ping-pong-ing between single and double precision, it
is also useful because it avoids the domain fixing algorithm from seeing
domain breaks that don't actually exist. It will also be much more
important if we have an execution domain default other than packed
single, as that would cause us to mix movss and movsd with integer
vector code on a regular basis, a very bad mixture.
llvm-svn: 228135
This reverts patches 223862, 224198, 224203, and 224754, which were all
related to the vector load/store combining and were reverted/reaplied
a few times due to the same alignment problems we're seeing now.
Further tests, mainly self-hosting Clang, will be needed to reapply this
patch in the future.
llvm-svn: 228129
This is the simplest form of bit-math based blending which only fires
when we are blending with zero and is relatively profitable. I've only
enabled this path on very specific lowering strategies. I'm planning to
widen its applicability in subsequent patches, but so far you'll notice
that even though we get fewer shufps instructions, we *still* do the bit
math in the FP execution port. I'm looking into why this is still
happening.
llvm-svn: 228124
Specifically, the existing patterns were scalar-only. These cover the
packed vector bitwise operations when specifically requested with pseudo
instructions. This is particularly important in SSE1 where we can't
actually emit a logical operation on a v2i64 as that isn't a legal type.
This will be tested in subsequent patches which form the floating point
and patterns in more places.
llvm-svn: 228123
The ARM assembler allows register alias redefinitions as long as it
targets the same register. r222319 broke that. In the AArch64 case
it would just produce a new warning, but in the ARM case it would
error out on previously accepted assembler.
llvm-svn: 228109
This pass is responsible for figuring out where to place call safepoints and safepoint polls. It doesn't actually make the relocations explicit; that's the job of the RewriteStatepointsForGC pass (http://reviews.llvm.org/D6975).
Note that this code is not yet finalized. Its moving in tree for incremental development, but further cleanup is needed and will happen over the next few days. It is not yet part of the standard pass order.
Planned changes in the near future:
- I plan on restructuring the statepoint rewrite to use the functions add to the IRBuilder a while back.
- In the current pass, the function "gc.safepoint_poll" is treated specially but is not an intrinsic. I plan to make identifying the poll function a property of the GCStrategy at some point in the near future.
- As follow on patches, I will be separating a collection of test cases we have out of tree and submitting them upstream.
- It's not explicit in the code, but these two patches are introducing a new state for a statepoint which looks a lot like a patchpoint. There's no a transient form which doesn't yet have the relocations explicitly represented, but does prevent reordering of memory operations. Once this is in, I need to update actually make this explicit by reserving the 'unused' argument of the statepoint as a flag, updating the docs, and making the code explicitly check for such a thing. This wasn't really planned, but once I split the two passes - which was done for other reasons - the intermediate state fell out. Just reminds us once again that we need to merge statepoints and patchpoints at some point in the not that distant future.
Future directions planned:
- Identifying more cases where a backedge safepoint isn't required to ensure timely execution of a safepoint poll.
- Tweaking the insertion process to generate easier to optimize IR. (For example, investigating making SplitBackedge) the default.
- Adding opt-in flags for a GCStrategy to use this pass. Once done, add this pass to the actual pass ordering.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6981
llvm-svn: 228090
This preserves the handy functionality of force-enabling the MachineVerifier, without the need to embed usage of environment variables in LLVM client applications.
llvm-svn: 228079
Patch by: Igor Laevsky
"This change generalizes statepoint verification to use ImmutableCallSite instead of CallInst. This will allow to easily implement invoke statepoint verification (in a following change)."
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7308
llvm-svn: 228064
I've noticed this while trying to move addRuntimeCheck to LoopAccessAnalysis.
I think that the intention was to early exit from the overflow checking before
the code for the memchecks. This is the entire reason why we compute
FirstCheckInst but then we don't use that as the splitting instruction but the
final check. Looks like an oversight.
llvm-svn: 228056
Patch to match cases where shuffle masks can be reduced to bit shifts. Similar to byte shift shuffle matching from D5699.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6649
llvm-svn: 228047
Patch by Kit Barton.
Add the vector population count instructions for byte, halfword, word,
and doubleword sizes. There are two major changes here:
PPCISelLowering.cpp: Make CTPOP legal for vector types.
PPCRegisterInfo.td: Added v2i64 to the VRRC register
definition. This is needed for the doubleword variations of the
integer ops that were added in P8.
Test Plan
Test the instruction vpcnt* encoding/decoding in ppc64-encoding-vmx.s
Test the generation of the vpopcnt instructions for various vector
data types. When adding the v2i64 type to the Vector Register set, I
also needed to add the appropriate bit conversion patterns between
v2i64 and the existing vector types. Testing for these conversions
were also added in the test case by passing a different vector type as
a parameter into the test functions. There is also a run step that
will ensure the vpopcnt instructions are generated when the vsx
feature is disabled.
llvm-svn: 228046
Summary: Make sure that FileCheck is built when running check-fuzzer
Test Plan:
run on bot:
lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fuzzer
Reviewers: samsonov
Reviewed By: samsonov
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7387
llvm-svn: 228045
What this does is that if you accidentally select these instructions on VI,
the code generation will fail, because the pseudo -> _vi mapping will be
undefined.
The idea is to be able to catch possible future bugs easily.
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 228038
Also re-implements the `dwarf::Tag` enumerator. I've moved the mock
tags into the enumerator since there's no other way to do this. Really
they shouldn't be used at all (they're just a hack to identify
`MDNode`s, but we have a class hierarchy for that now).
llvm-svn: 228030
`dwarf::TagString()` shouldn't stringify `DW_TAG_lo_user` or
`DW_TAG_hi_user`. These aren't actual tags; they're markers for the
edge of vendor-specific tag regions.
llvm-svn: 228029
This patch adds general shuffle pattern matching for the MOVQ zero-extend instruction (copy lower 64bits, zero upper) for all 128-bit integer vectors, it is added as a fallback test in lowerVectorShuffleAsZeroOrAnyExtend.
llvm-svn: 228022
Summary:
Straight-line strength reduction (SLSR) is implemented in GCC but not yet in
LLVM. It has proven to effectively simplify statements derived from an unrolled
loop, and can potentially benefit many other cases too. For example,
LLVM unrolls
#pragma unroll
foo (int i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
sum += foo((b + i) * s);
}
into
sum += foo(b * s);
sum += foo((b + 1) * s);
sum += foo((b + 2) * s);
However, no optimizations yet reduce the internal redundancy of the three
expressions:
b * s
(b + 1) * s
(b + 2) * s
With SLSR, LLVM can optimize these three expressions into:
t1 = b * s
t2 = t1 + s
t3 = t2 + s
This commit is only an initial step towards implementing a series of such
optimizations. I will implement more (see TODO in the file commentary) in the
near future. This optimization is enabled for the NVPTX backend for now.
However, I am more than happy to push it to the standard optimization pipeline
after more thorough performance tests.
Test Plan: test/StraightLineStrengthReduce/slsr.ll
Reviewers: eliben, HaoLiu, meheff, hfinkel, jholewinski, atrick
Reviewed By: jholewinski, atrick
Subscribers: karthikthecool, jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7310
llvm-svn: 228016
Daniel Sanders