Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Alina Sbirlea d2d3244363 [LoopSimplifyCFG] Update MemorySSA after r353911.
Summary:
MemorySSA is not properly updated in LoopSimplifyCFG after recent changes. Use SplitBlock utility to resolve that and clear all updates once handleDeadExits is finished.
All updates that follow are removal of edges which are safe to handle via the removeEdge() API.
Also, deleting dead blocks is done correctly as is, i.e. delete from MemorySSA before updating the CFG and DT.

Reviewers: mkazantsev, rtereshin

Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58524

llvm-svn: 354613
2019-02-21 19:54:05 +00:00
Sam McCall a860219c5e [LoopSimplifyCFG] Fix test broken in release mode in r353813
llvm-svn: 353842
2019-02-12 14:43:30 +00:00
Max Kazantsev bf6af8fbf0 [LoopSimplifyCFG] Change logic of dead loops removal to avoid hitting asserts
The function `LI.erase` has some invariants that need to be preserved when it
tries to remove a loop which is not the top-level loop. In particular, it
requires loop's preheader to be strictly in loop's parent. Our current logic
of deletion of dead blocks may erase the information about preheader before we
handle the loop, and therefore we may hit this assertion.

This patch changes the logic of loop deletion: we make them top-level loops
before we actually erase them. This allows us to trigger the simple branch of
`erase` logic which just detatches blocks from the loop and does not try to do
some complex stuff that need this invariant.

Thanks to @uabelho for reporting this!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57221
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev

llvm-svn: 353813
2019-02-12 09:37:00 +00:00
Max Kazantsev 6f2a0c6827 [NFC] Add test with multiple loops
llvm-svn: 352176
2019-01-25 08:46:00 +00:00
Max Kazantsev 66f92df761 [NFC] Add another failing test on LoopSimplifyCFG
llvm-svn: 352026
2019-01-24 05:43:19 +00:00