When we switched to the LLVM .debug_line parser, the .dSYM-style path
remapping logic stopped working for relative paths because of how
RemapSourceFile silently fails for relative paths. This patch both
makes the code more readable and fixes this particular bug.
One interesting thing I learned is that Module::RemapSourceFile() is a
macOS-only code path that operates on on the lldb::Module level and is
completely separate from target.source-map, which operates on a
per-Target level.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70037
rdar://problem/56924558
The new experimental expansion has a problem when a value has a data
dependency with an instruction from a previous stage. This is due to
the way we peel out the kernel. To fix that I'm changing the way we
peel out the kernel. We now peel the kernel NumberStage - 1 times.
The code would be correct at this point if we didn't have to handle
cases where the loop iteration is smaller than the number of stages.
To handle this case we move instructions between different epilogues
based on their stage and remap the PHI instructions correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69538
simd-based directives.
According to OpenMP 5.0 standard, ordered simd, atomic and simd
directives are allowed as nested directives in the simd-based
directives.
Summary:
This revision introduces a new interface `MatchComputation` which generalizes
the `Stencil` interface and replaces the `std::function` interface of
`MatchConsumer`. With this revision, `Stencil` (as an abstraction) becomes just
one collection of implementations of
`MatchComputation<std::string>`. Correspondingly, we remove the `Stencil` class
entirely in favor of a simple type alias, deprecate `MatchConsumer` and change
all functions that accepted `MatchConsumer<std::string>` to use
`MatchComputation<std::string>` instead.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69802
Summary: Bionic was modified to have all function names consistent. Modify the code and get rid of the special case for bionic since it's no longer needed.
Reviewers: cryptoad
Reviewed By: cryptoad
Subscribers: srhines, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70031
Simple change to call target hook analyzeLoopForPipelining before
changing the loop. After peeling analyzing the loop may be more
complicated for target that don't have a loop instruction. This doesn't
affect Hexagone and PPC as they have hardware loop instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69912
For example:
long long test(long long a, long long b) {
if (a << b > 0)
return b;
if (a << b < 0)
return a;
return a*b;
}
Produces:
sld. 5, 3, 4
ble 0, .LBB0_2
mr 3, 4
blr
.LBB0_2: # %if.end
cmpldi 5, 0
li 5, 1
isel 4, 4, 5, 2
mulld 3, 4, 3
blr
But the compare (cmpldi 5, 0) is redundant and can be removed (CR0 already
contains the result of that comparison).
The root cause of this is that LLVM converts signed comparisons into equality
comparison based on dominance. Equality comparisons are unsigned by default, so
we get either a record-form or cmp (without the l for logical) feeding a cmpl.
That is the situation we want to avoid here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60506
gcc-9 started warning when a class defined a copy constructor without a
copy assignment operator (or vice-versa).
This fixes those warnings by deleting the other special member too
(after verifying it doesn't do anything non-trivial).
The tail-call-kind-ness is known by the ObjCARC analysis and can be
enforced while lowering the intrinsics to calls.
This allows us to get the requested tail calls at -O0 without trying to
preserve the attributes throughout passes that change code even at -O0
,like the Always Inliner, where the ObjCOpt pass doesn't run.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69980
The mock server pretends the process stopped with signal 17, which is
SIGCHLD on linux. This causes lldb to resume to process, utterly
confusing the test. Lldb probably shouldn't resume in this case, but for
now this issue can be fixed by changing the signal number to 2, which is
SIGINT just about anywhere.
The Overflow version of XO-Form instruction uses the SO, OV and
OV32 special registers.
This changes modifies existing multiclasses and instruction
definitions to allow for the use of the XER register to record
the various types if overflow from possible add, subtract and
multiply instructions. It then modifies the existing instructions
as to use these multiclasses as needed.
Patch By: Kamau Bridgeman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66902
Summary:
TypeScript now supports declaring fields:
class Foo {
declare field: string;
}
clang-format happens to already format this fine, so this change just
adds a regression test.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69972
Summary:
JavaScript / TypeScript is adding two new operators: the null
propagating operator `?.` and the nullish coalescing operator `??`.
const x = foo ?? 'default';
const z = foo?.bar?.baz;
This change adds support to lex and format both.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69971
We effectively never want to export that function, which is an
implementation detail of libc++. This was previously tried in
603715c66b and then reverted in 8335dd314f because it caused
linker warnings. These linker warnings should go away now that we
use internal_linkage instead of always_inline to implement per-TU
insulation.
Re-try because earlier attempts were reverted due to use-after-free.
Hopefully, diagnosed correctly this time - we replace/remove the
invariant.start first rather than the invariant.end to avoid angering
worklist-based iteration.
We gather a set of white-listed instructions in isAllocSiteRemovable() and then
replace/erase them. But we don't know in general if the instructions in the set
have uses amongst themselves, so order of deletion makes a difference.
There's already a special-case for the llvm.objectsize intrinsic, so add another
for llvm.invariant.start.
Should fix:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43723
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69977
Summary:
We use the name from the IdentifierInfo of the Macro to compute its
SymbolID. It is better to just take the Name as a parameter to avoid
storing the IdentifierInfo whenever we need the SymbolID for the Macro.
Patch by UTKARSH SAXENA!
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69937
Summary:
SimplifySelectsFeedingBinaryOp simplified binary ops when both operands
were selects with the same condition. This patch extends it to handle
these cases where only one operand is a select:
X op (C ? P : Q) -> C ? (X op P) : (X op Q)
// if X op P and X op Q both simplify
(C ? P : Q) op Y -> C ? (P op Y) : (Q op Y)
// if P op Y and Q op Y both simplify
For example: X *fast (C ? 1.0 : 0.0) -> C ? X : 0.0
Reviewers: mcberg2017, majnemer, craig.topper, qcolombet, mcrosier
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64713
This started passing target-features on the linker line, not just for RISCV but
for all targets, leading to error messages in Chromium Android build:
'+soft-float-abi' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
'+soft-float-abi' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
See Phabricator review for details.
Reverting until this can be fixed properly.
> Summary:
> 1. enable LTO need to pass target feature and abi to LTO code generation
> RISCV backend need the target feature to decide which extension used in
> code generation.
> 2. move getTargetFeatures to CommonArgs.h and add ForLTOPlugin flag
> 3. add general tools::getTargetABI in CommonArgs.h because different target uses different
> way to get the target ABI.
>
> Patch by Kuan Hsu Chen (khchen)
>
> Reviewers: lenary, lewis-revill, asb, MaskRay
>
> Reviewed By: lenary
>
> Subscribers: hiraditya, dschuff, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, mehdi_amini, inglorion, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, steven_wu, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, dexonsmith, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, cfe-commits
>
> Tags: #clang
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67409
Summary:
There is a regression from https://reviews.llvm.org/D68467. Unlike class
forward declarations, function ducomentation is written in the declaration in
headers, the function definition doesn't contain any documentation, cases like:
```
foo.h
// this is foo.
void foo();
foo.cc
void foo() {}
```
we should still show documentation from the foo declaration.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69961
Adrian Prantl